Cited by 18Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Managing technology, content, and user experience: an mHealth intervention to improve women’s health literacy after incarceration

Open access
Geana, Mugur V., Anderson, Sherri, Lipnicky, Ashlyn, Wickliffe, Joi L., Ramaswamy, Megha·2021·Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Abstract

Every year, more than 3.2 million women come into contact with the criminal legal system in the United States. 1 Representing the fastest-growing incarcerated group, women with criminal legal histories are more likely to report chronic conditions, such as cancer, hypertension, heart disease, and diabetes.2 Around 67% of females in jails reported ever having a chronic condition.3 On top of these health issues, many women are affected by sexual trauma, poverty, drug addition, mental illness, and limited access to medical care.4 The majority of incarcerated women are between the ages of 18 and 44. 1 Women with incarceration histories bear a greater burden of sexual and reproductive health problems such as abnormal Pap test histories, cervical cancer, unintended pregnancies, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).1,5,6 In addition, there is a growing number of women in jails and prisons who are 55 and older, a group of women who have lower rates of up-to-date mammograms compared with the general population.7,8 When released from jail, women must face these and other health and social problems as they reorient themselves back into the community.9,10 Community reentry presents an opportune moment for health intervention in that it gets women to think about changing circumstances at a high-risk time 11 and may provide women with resources to see those changes through.Researchers have found that women with past criminal legal histories are often savvy health care users, though woefully underinsured in some regions of the U.S. 12 Although most incarcerated women are knowledgeable about behavioral health issues to some extent, many have beliefs about women's health that are outdated, often affected by family, medical, or social beliefs about screening regimens, or in some cases their own trauma histories.13 These women also have multiple barriers to following through on recommended screening and prevention-specifically, their own

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hpu.2021.0053

Cites

53 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [37]Parker R Measuring health literacy: What? So what? Now what? In: Measures of health literacy: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.
  2. [53]Kusumaningputri R Engaging dialogues to experience a bigger picture: the potential of portfolios, digital storytelling with video shows for reading activities. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research. 2020; 17(1): 21– 37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geana, M. V., Anderson, S., Lipnicky, A., Wickliffe, J. L., & Ramaswamy, M.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Geana, Mugur V.
Venue
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2021
Volume
32
Issue
2S
Pages
106-127
ISSN
  • 1049-2089 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-6869
OpenAlex
W3157551187
Cited by
18
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA181047)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
mobile health intervention, health literacy, women prisoners, women's reentry, post-release care, sexual and reproductive health, cancer screening, mammography, cervical cancer screening, sexually transmitted infections, chronic disease, health beliefs, barriers to screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review