Cited by 90Smart Grid Security and ResilienceNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization

Flow whitelisting in SCADA networks

Open access
Barbosa, Rafael Ramos Regis, Sadre, Ramin, Pras, Aiko·2013·International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcip.2013.08.003

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors of [47] proposed a flow whitelisting approach to enhance network security inside companies.

    “In [47], the authors proposed a flow whitelisting approach to enhance the network security inside companies.”

    From Social Engineering Attacks: A Survey (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Abstract and Introduction describe the authors' proposed flow-whitelisting approach for securing SCADA networks. The claim broadens its setting to networks inside companies generally; the Introduction says flow-level whitelists are not commonly used in traditional IP networks because their legitimate connections are too numerous to manage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. R. Sommer, A. Feldmann, NetFlow: Information loss or win?, in: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurement, 2012, pp. 173-174.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbosa, R. R. R., Sadre, R., & Pras, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
Barbosa, Rafael Ramos Regis
Venue
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
6
Issue
3-4
Pages
150-158
ISSN
1874-5482 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120400483
Cited by
90
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
Keywords
SCADA networks, network security, industrial control systems, network traffic analysis, anomaly detection, water treatment plant, cyberattacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review