The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maturation of astrocyte morphology and the establishment of astrocyte domains during postnatal hippocampal development
Abstract
Mature protoplasmic astrocytes exhibit an extremely dense ramification of fine processes, yielding a ‘spongiform’ morphology. This complex morphology enables protoplasmic astrocytes to maintain intimate relationships with many elements of the brain parenchyma, most notably synapses. Recently, it has been demonstrated that astrocytes establish individual cellular‐level domains within the neuropil, with limited overlap occurring between the extents of neighboring astrocytes. The highly ramified nature of protoplasmic astrocytes is closely associated with their ability to create such domains. This study was an attempt to characterize the development of spongiform processes and the establishment of astrocyte domains. A combination of immunolabeling for the astrocyte‐specific markers glial fibrillary acidic protein and S100β with intracellular dye labeling in fixed tissue slices allowed for the identification of immature astrocytes and the elucidation of their complete, well‐preserved morphologies. We find that during the first two postnatal weeks astrocytes extend stringy, filopodial processes. Fine, spongiform processes appear during the third week. Protoplasmic astrocytes are quite heterogeneous in morphology at 1‐week postnatum, but there is a remarkable consistency in morphology by 2 weeks of age. Finally, protoplasmic astrocytes initially extend long, overlapping processes during the first two postnatal weeks. The subsequent elaboration of spongiform processes results in the development of boundaries between neighboring astrocyte domains. Stray processes that encroach on neighboring domains are eventually pruned by 1 month of age. These observations suggest that domain formation is largely the consequence of competition between astrocyte processes, similar to the well‐studied competitive interactions between certain neuronal dendritic fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibodies, a laboratory manual
(1989) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/0753-3322(89)90130-3 · Cited by 12,366
Ashburner, M. (1989) · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory eBooks · Cited by 6,756
Rho GTPases and the Actin Cytoskeleton
Hall, A. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5350.509 · Cited by 6,140
Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner
Araque, A., Parpura, V., Sanzgiri, R. P., & Haydon, P. G. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01349-6 · Cited by 2,529
CNS synaptogenesis promoted by glia-derived cholesterol
Mauch, D. H., Nägler, K., Schumacher, S., Göritz, C., Müller, E.-C., Otto, A., & Pfrieger, F. W. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.294.5545.1354 · Cited by 1,711
Protoplasmic Astrocytes in CA1 Stratum Radiatum Occupy Separate Anatomical Domains
Bushong, E. A., Martone, M. E., Jones, Y. Z., & Ellisman, M. H. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-01-00183.2002 · Cited by 1,578
Self-citationMatsuzaki, M., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., Nemoto, T., Miyashita, Y., Iino, M., & Kasai, H. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn736 · Cited by 1,563 · cited 2×
“…has recently been demonstrated that most of the pyramidal dendritic profiles in hippocampal slices from 7- to 9-day-old rat are not sensitive to glutamate and that the presence of a mushroom spine is strongly correlated with an AMPA receptor-mediated response to glutamate (Matsuzaki et al., 2001).”
BackgroundControl of Synapse Number by Glia
Ullian, E. M., Sapperstein, S. K., Christopherson, K. S., & Barres, B. A. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5504.657 · Cited by 1,380
Rakic, P. (1971) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901410303 · Cited by 1,339
Harris, K., Jensen, F., & Tsao, B. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-07-02685.1992 · Cited by 1,079
Cited by
Cahoy, J. D., Emery, B., Kaushal, A., Foo, L. C., Zamanian, J. L., Christopherson, K. S., Xing, Y., Lubischer, J. L., Krieg, P. A., Krupenko, S. A., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4178-07.2008 · Cited by 3,129
“We acutely purified mouse astrocytes from early postnatal ages [postnatal day 1 (P1)] to later postnatal ages (P30), when astrocyte differentiation is morphologically complete (Bushong et al., 2004), and acutely purified mouse OL-lineage cells from stages ranging from OPCs to newly differentiated OLs to myelinating OL…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAstrocytes, from brain glue to communication elements: the revolution continues
Volterra, A., & Meldolesi, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1722 · Cited by 1,770
Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis
Pekny, M., & Nilsson, M. (2005) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.20207 · Cited by 1,611
Diversity of astrocyte functions and phenotypes in neural circuits
Khakh, B. S., & Sofroniew, M. V. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4043 · Cited by 1,239
Cell Biology of Astrocyte-Synapse Interactions
Allen, N. J., & Eroglu, C. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.056 · Cited by 1,098
Metadata
- Authors
- Bushong, E. A., Martone, M. E., & Ellisman, M. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-86
- ISSN
- 0736-5748 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-474X
- OpenAlex
- W2070081929
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maturation of astrocyte morphology and the establishment of astrocyte domains during postnatal hippocampal development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2003.12.008
- The paper
- Bushong, E. A., Martone, M. E., & Ellisman, M. H. (2004). Maturation of astrocyte morphology and the establishment of astrocyte domains during postnatal hippocampal development. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2003.12.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.