The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges
Open accessAbstract
Despite highly specialised and capable emergency management systems, ordinary citizens are usually first on the scene in an emergency or disaster, and remain long after official services have ceased. Citizens often play vital roles in helping those affected to respond and recover, and can provide invaluable assistance to official agencies. However, in most developed countries, emergency and disaster management relies largely on a workforce of professionals and, to varying degrees, volunteers affiliated with official agencies. Those who work outside of such systems have tended to be viewed as a nuisance or liability, and their efforts are often undervalued. Given increasing disaster risk worldwide due to population growth, urban development and climate change, it is likely that ‘informal’ volunteers will provide much of the additional surge capacity required to respond to more frequent emergencies and disasters in the future. This paper considers the role of informal volunteers in emergency and disaster management. Definitions of volunteerism are reviewed and it is argued that there is an overemphasis on volunteering within, and for, state and formal organisations. We offer a broader definition of ‘informal volunteerism’ that recognises the many ways ordinary citizens volunteer their time, knowledge, skills and resources to help others in times of crisis. Two broad types of informal volunteerism are identified – emergent and extending – and the implications for emergency and disaster management are considered. Particular attention is given to increasing ‘digital volunteerism’ due to the greater accessibility of sophisticated but simple information and communication technologies. Culture and legal liability are identified as key barriers to greater participation of informal volunteers. We argue that more adaptive and inclusive models of emergency and disaster management are needed to harness the capacities and resilience that exist within and across communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Edenhofer, O., & Seyboth, K. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375067-9.00128-5 · Cited by 3,672
Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Plattner, G., Allen, S., et al. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 3,037
Wilson, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215 · Cited by 1,781
Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657355 · Cited by 1,409
Linders, D. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003 · Cited by 1,333
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
(2005) · Encyclopedia of United States National Security · doi:10.4135/9781412952446.n202 · Cited by 1,162
Rodríguez, H., Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (2007) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4 · Cited by 920
Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier
Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538941003759255 · Cited by 909
Volunteerism Research: A Review Essay
Wilson, J. (2012) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764011434558 · Cited by 840
Cited by
Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges
Li, S., Dragicevic, S., Castro, F. A., Sester, M., Winter, S., Coltekin, A., Pettit, C., Jiang, B., Haworth, J., Stein, A., et al. (2016) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.012 · Cited by 749
Jurgens, M., & Helsloot, I. (2018) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12212 · Cited by 139
Volunteering research in Australia: A narrative review
Kragt, D., & Holtrop, D. (2019) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12251 · Cited by 120
Escape to the island: International volunteer engagement on Lesvos during the refugee crisis
Guribye, E., & Mydland, T. S. (2018) · Journal of Civil Society · doi:10.1080/17448689.2018.1518774 · Cited by 24
Zeng, X., Ji, D., Thadani, D. R., Li, B., Pu, X., Cai, Z., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3593056 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittaker, J., McLennan, B., & Handmer, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 358-368
- ISSN
- 2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1119706571
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 80.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.010
- The paper
- Whittaker, J., McLennan, B., & Handmer, J. (2015). A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.