What does it mean to psychologically prepare for a disaster? A systematic review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Convergent validity was supported by moderate to strong positive correlations with disaster resilience (r = .680) and self-efficacy (r = .734), consistent with prior literature.
“Convergent validity was supported by moderate to strong positive correlations with disaster resilience ( r = .680) and self-efficacy ( r = .734), consistent with prior literature highlighting the role of confidence, coping capacity, and practical knowledge in psychological preparedness [7,10].”
From Development and validation of the Japanese version of the psychological preparedness for disaster threat scale (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
BAŞOĞLU, M., ŞALCIOĞLU, E., & LIVANOU, M. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706009123 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kubo, T., Takamoto, M., Suzuki, M., Takenouchi, K., & Sadamitsu, C. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-05639-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boylan, J. L., & Lawrence, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Boylan, Jessica L.
- ORCID
- Lawrence, Carmen
- Venue
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 45
- Pages
- 101480
- ISSN
- 2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2999410432
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
- Keywords
- psychological preparedness, bushfires, disaster preparedness, measurement instruments, psychometric validity, construct definition, emergency services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
