CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177Risk Perception and ManagementCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COVID-19 risk perception and coping mechanisms: Does gender make a difference?

Open access
Rana, Irfan Ahmad, Bhatti, Saad Saleem, Aslam, Atif Bilal, Jamshed, Ali, Ahmad, Junaid, Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad·2021·International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102096PMC PMC7987376
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged as a real threat to humans, drastically disrupting everyday life in 2020-21. Although the pandemic affected people from all walks of life, irrespective of age or gender, the way the risk is perceived varies from one person to another. The pandemic risk reduction strategies can only be effective if individuals and communities respond positively to them, and for that, it is important to understand how the risk is perceived and responded to, differently by different groups of people. Gender plays a vital role in shaping risk perceptions and coping strategies, reflecting the predisposition of the public to accept health interventions and take precautionary measures. This study aims to understand the gender differences in COVID-19 risk perception and coping mechanisms - Pakistan is selected as a case study area. Following on from designing the questionnaire, which included 40 indicators grouped into domains (four risk perception and three coping mechanisms domains), an online survey was conducted, and a sample of 389 respondents was collected (248 male and 141 female). An index-based approach was used to quantify risk perception and its domains (fear, behaviour, awareness, and trust), and likewise coping mechanisms and their domains (problem, emotion, and action). Statistical tests were employed to ascertain the differences among both genders, whereas regression modelling was used to measure the effect of gender on overall risk perception and coping mechanisms. Results reveal that perceived fear and trust varied significantly between Pakistani men and women, while coping mechanisms were also notably different between the two genders. Females were found to perceive risks higher, complied more with the government's guidelines, and coped better than males in response to COVID-19. These findings imply that the gender aspect must be incorporated in designing effective communication and risk reduction strategies to efficiently address the current and potential future pandemic situations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102096

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. O'Donnell, 2020, Playing the long game: how a gender lens can mitigate harm caused by pandemics, Cent. Glob. Dev.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–177 of 177

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rana, I. A., Bhatti, S. S., Aslam, A. B., Jamshed, A., Ahmad, J., & Shah, A. A.
Affiliations
  • National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK)
  • University of Stuttgart (DE)
  • Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Rana, Irfan Ahmad
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
55
Pages
102096
ISSN
2212-4209 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102096
PMC
PMC7987376
OpenAlex
W3127748913
Cited by
177
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 30
FWCI
53.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, risk perception, coping strategies, gender differences, fear, public trust in government, pandemic communication, risk mitigation strategies, Pakistan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review