Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
The whole educational system from elementary to tertiary level has been collapsed during the lockdown period of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) not only in India but across the globe. This study is a portrayal of online teaching-learning modes adopted by the Mizoram University for the teaching-learning process and subsequent semester examinations. It looks forward to an intellectually enriched opportunity for further future academic decision-making during any adversity. The intended purpose of this paper seeks to address the required essentialities of online teaching-learning in education amid the COVID-19 pandemic and how can existing resources of educational institutions effectively transform formal education into online education with the help of virtual classes and other pivotal online tools in this continually shifting educational landscape. The paper employs both quantitative and qualitative approach to study the perceptions of teachers and students on online teaching-learning modes and also highlighted the implementation process of online teaching-learning modes. The value of this paper is to draw a holistic picture of ongoing online teaching-learning activities during the lockdown period including establishing the linkage between change management process and online teaching-learning process in education system amid the COVID-19 outbreak so as to overcome the persisting academic disturbance and consequently ensure the resumption of educational activities and discourses as a normal course of procedure in the education system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In developed countries like Japan and the United States of America, learners perform well on commercial subjects in primary and secondary schools, whereas in South Africa learners underperform in EMS.
“The literature indicates that in developed countries like Japan and the United State of America learners are performing well on commercial subjects in both primary and secondary schools whereas in South Africa learners are underperforming in EMS (Mishra & Gupta, 2020).”
From Exploration of curriculum changes in the learning and teaching methods of economic and management sciences (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra & Gupta, 2020
Cites
Sahu, P. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.7541 · Cited by 2,353 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Reedy, A., Pfitzner, D., Rook, L., & Ellis, L. (2021) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Mushtaha, E., Abu Dabous, S., Alsyouf, I., Ahmed, A., & Raafat Abdraboh, N. (2022) · Ain Shams Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asej.2022.101770 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Kumpikaitė-Valiūnienė, V., Aslan, I., Duobienė, J., Glińska, E., & Anandkumar, V. (2021) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s325092 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Alam, F., Yang, Q., Bhutto, M. Y., & Akhtar, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715700 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Pietrabissa, G., Volpi, C., Bottacchi, M., Bertuzzi, V., Guerrini Usubini, A., Löffler-Stastka, H., Prevendar, T., Rapelli, G., Cattivelli, R., Castelnuovo, G., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18063026 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Cook, H., Apps, T., Beckman, K., & Bennett, S. (2023) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10194-4 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mahapatra, S. K. (2021) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00603-8 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Gadosey, C. K., Grunschel, C., Kegel, L. S., Schnettler, T., Turhan, D., Scheunemann, A., Bäulke, L., Thomas, L., Buhlmann, U., Dresel, M., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918367 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Evaluation of Improvised and Eco-Friendly Natural pH-Paper Indicators
Jabeen, M., Tariq, K., Rehman, A., Aslam, N., Zafar, A. M., & Hussain, S. U. (2022) · FRONTIERS IN CHEMICAL SCIENCES · doi:10.52700/fcs.v3i2.58 · Cited by 4
Mathebula, D., Nkondo, L. G., Dlamini, N. P., & Khumalo, P. N. (2025) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i97a08 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A.
- Affiliations
- Mizoram University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Mishra, Lokanath
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Research Open
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 100012
- ISSN
- 2666-3740 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7832355
- OpenAlex
- W3085749548
- Cited by
- 2,542
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 111 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 340 · 2023: 601 · 2022: 665 · 2021: 578 · 2020: 43
- FWCI
- 675.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Research Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Keywords
- online teaching-learning, COVID-19 lockdown, higher education, virtual classes, online examinations, teacher perceptions, student perceptions, change management, educational disruption, online learning tools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review