Cited by 2,542Education during COVID-19 pandemicEducational Innovations and TechnologyE-Learning and COVID-19

Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Mishra, Lokanath, Gupta, Tushar, Shree, Abha·2020·International Journal of Educational Research Open

Abstract

The whole educational system from elementary to tertiary level has been collapsed during the lockdown period of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) not only in India but across the globe. This study is a portrayal of online teaching-learning modes adopted by the Mizoram University for the teaching-learning process and subsequent semester examinations. It looks forward to an intellectually enriched opportunity for further future academic decision-making during any adversity. The intended purpose of this paper seeks to address the required essentialities of online teaching-learning in education amid the COVID-19 pandemic and how can existing resources of educational institutions effectively transform formal education into online education with the help of virtual classes and other pivotal online tools in this continually shifting educational landscape. The paper employs both quantitative and qualitative approach to study the perceptions of teachers and students on online teaching-learning modes and also highlighted the implementation process of online teaching-learning modes. The value of this paper is to draw a holistic picture of ongoing online teaching-learning activities during the lockdown period including establishing the linkage between change management process and online teaching-learning process in education system amid the COVID-19 outbreak so as to overcome the persisting academic disturbance and consequently ensure the resumption of educational activities and discourses as a normal course of procedure in the education system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In developed countries like Japan and the United States of America, learners perform well on commercial subjects in primary and secondary schools, whereas in South Africa learners underperform in EMS.

    “The literature indicates that in developed countries like Japan and the United State of America learners are performing well on commercial subjects in both primary and secondary schools whereas in South Africa learners are underperforming in EMS (Mishra & Gupta, 2020).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A.
Affiliations
Mizoram University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mishra, Lokanath
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research Open
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
Volume
1
Pages
100012
ISSN
2666-3740 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3085749548
Cited by
2,542
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 340 · 2023: 601 · 2022: 665 · 2021: 578 · 2020: 43
FWCI
675.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Research Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
online teaching-learning, COVID-19 lockdown, higher education, virtual classes, online examinations, teacher perceptions, student perceptions, change management, educational disruption, online learning tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review