Cited by 527Education during COVID-19 pandemicE-Learning and COVID-19Online and Blended Learning

Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester

Open access
Bond, Melissa, Bedenlier, Svenja, Marín, Victoria I., Händel, Marion·2021·International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Abstract

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic that spread globally in 2020, higher education courses were subsequently offered in fully remote, online formats. A plethora of primary studies began investigating a range of topics exploring teaching and learning in higher education, particularly during the initial semester. In order to provide an overview and initial understanding of this emerging research field, a systematic mapping review was conducted that collates and describes the characteristics of 282 primary empirical studies. Findings reveal that research was carried out mostly descriptively and cross-sectionally, focusing predominantly on undergraduate students and their perceptions of teaching and learning during the pandemic. Studies originate from a broad range of countries, are overwhelmingly published open access, and largely focused on the fields of Health & Welfare and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics . Educational technology used for emergency remote teaching are most often synchronous collaborative tools , used in combination with text-based tools . The findings are discussed against pre-pandemic research on educational technology use in higher education teaching and learning, and perspectives for further research are provided.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic mapping review collates 282 primary empirical studies on emergency remote teaching in higher education during the first global online semester of COVID-19. It finds research was mostly descriptive, cross-sectional, student-focused, and dominated by Health & Welfare and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics, with synchronous collaboration tools most used.

Key findings

  • The review included 282 studies: 256 journal articles from 155 unique journals, 88.3% (n = 249) open access, authors from 73 countries and participants from 79 countries; the United States was the most prevalent author affiliation (23.4%, n = 66) and participant source (20.6%, n = 58).
  • Most studies focused solely on higher education students (68.1%, n = 192), especially undergraduates (46.1%, n = 130); only 36 studies focused just on teachers/instructors (12.8%), and the top topic was student perceptions of online learning (60.6%, n = 171).
  • Research was largely quantitative (53.6%, n = 151) and cross-sectional (92.2%, n = 260); 83% (n = 234) used online surveys, 80% (n = 227) reported descriptive statistics, and only 10.6% (n = 30) used a theoretical framework.
  • Technology use was most often synchronous collaboration tools, especially video conferencing (51.8%), followed by LMS (41.5%), multimodal production tools (34.8%), and text-based tools (31.9%); assessment tools were 22.3%, lower than the 26.8% found in a pre-pandemic review.

Methods

  • Systematic mapping review, pre-registered and PRISMA-guided, designed as a living systematic review; searches covered English, Spanish, and German studies using databases/platforms including Web of Science, Google Scholar, ERIC, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, Microsoft Academic Graph, Dialnet, Latindex, Redalyc, and CHELD V1.
  • Initial search was 24 July 2020 with subsequent searches until the first week of December 2020; 11,686 items were identified, 1,740 duplicates removed, 9,946 title/abstract screened, 661 full-text screened, and 282 studies included; inter-rater agreement was Cohen’s k = 0.80 and k = 0.83.
  • Data extraction coded publication/study characteristics, methodology, research focus, and technology using Bower’s typology; synthesis used tabulation and narrative description, Leximancer content analysis of English titles/abstracts (n = 262), and interactive evidence gap maps via EPPI-Mapper.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: the search needs continuous updating and additional databases such as FIS Bildung; special issues and institutional evaluations were not yet included; six journals were considered potentially predatory according to Beall’s List; no quality appraisal was conducted at this stage; human error in screening or coding cannot be fully discounted.
  • Stated in the paper: the review is a first mapping attempt, and further synthesis and quality assessment are planned for future iterations.
  • Evident from the text: Leximancer content analysis included English-language studies only (n = 262) despite trilingual inclusion; 55.7% (n = 157) did not report when data were collected; 18.8% did not formulate aims, research questions, or hypotheses; and 23.4% of studies had unclear participant discipline.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 37 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    46.1% (n = 130) of studies focused especially on undergraduates.

    “especially undergraduates (46.1%, n = 130)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    2.5% of studies used (quasi-)experimental designs.

    “2.5% of studies used (quasi-)experimental designs”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Authors hailed from 73 different countries.

    “hailing from 73 different countries”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Most collaboration between authors was domestic only (68.8%, n = 194).

    “Most of the collaboration between authors were of a domestic only nature (68.8%, n = 194)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    16.3% of studies had sample sizes of up to 25 participants.

    “16.3% of studies in the review had sample sizes of up to 25 participants”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most frequent discipline of first authors was Health & Welfare (22.3%, n = 63), followed by Education (18.1%, n = 51) and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (16%, n = 45).

    “the most frequent was Health & Welfare (22.3%, n = 63), followed by Education (18.1%, n = 51) and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (16%, n = 45).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants mostly hailed from Asia (27.7%), North America (22.7%) and Europe (27.3%).

    “Participants mostly hailed from Asia (n = 78, 27.7%), North America (n = 64, 22.7%) and Europe (n = 77, 27.3%)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The majority of studies were quantitative (53.6%, n = 151), 16.3% qualitative (n = 46), and 30.1% mixed methods (n = 85).

    “The majority of studies were coded as quantitative research (n = 151, 53.6%), 16.3% of studies (n = 46) used a qualitative approach, and 30.1% (n = 85) were coded as mixed methods studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was a first wave of publications that peaked in August 2020, after which monthly publications decreased.

    “there was a first wave of publications that peaked in August 2020 (see Fig. 3). After September 2020, the number of monthly publications decreased.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Research focused predominantly on students' perceptions of teaching and learning during the pandemic.

    “focusing predominantly on undergraduate students and their perceptions of teaching and learning during the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    8.2% of studies did not explicitly mention how they undertook their analysis.

    “8.2% did not explicitly mention in their report, how they undertook their analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The studies were published by 1,019 authors, mostly in teams of two or three.

    “The studies in this review were published by 1,019 authors, mostly in teams of two or three”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The review included 256 published journal articles from 155 unique journals.

    “The 256 published journal articles in this review were sourced from 155 unique journals”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most researched disciplines were Health & Welfare (27.3%), Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (24.1%) and Education (16%).

    “The most researched disciplines were Health & Welfare (27.3%), followed by Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (24.1%) and Education (16%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most often combined methods of data collection were surveys and interviews (8.5%, n = 24), followed by surveys and student grades (7.4%, n = 21).

    “The most often combined methods of data collection were surveys and interviews (8.5%, n = 24), such as the study of Indian educators and postgraduate students by Mishra et al. (2020), followed by surveys and student grades (7.4%, n = 21)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    10.3% (n = 29) of studies included more than 6 authors.

    “10.3% (n = 29) included more than 6 authors”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    17.4% of studies were written by only one author, 10.3% were collaborations between international and domestic authors, and only 3.5% were international collaborations.

    “17.4% were written by only one author, 10.3% were collaborations between international and domestic authors (two or more authors from the same country), and only 3.5% were published by international collaborations of authors from two or more completely different countries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The global geographical distribution of authors and participants' country affiliations mirrors previous findings, with a noticeable lack of research coming from the Global South and Oceanic countries.

    “The global geographical distribution of authors and participants’ country affiliations likewise mirrors previous findings (e.g., Bond et al., 2019), with a noticeable lack of research coming from the Global South and Oceanic countries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bond et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    12.8% of studies had unclear first author discipline.

    “For 36 studies (12.8%) it was not possible to identify the discipline of the first author.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Multimodal production tools had important presence (34.8%), particularly teachers' pre-recorded videos.

    “Other typologies of tools with important presence were text-based tools (especially text-based communication such as email or instant messaging, 31.9%) and multimodal production tools (34.8%), particularly the use of teachers’ pre-recorded videos.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    21.6% (n = 61) of studies were within a specific department, 26.6% (n = 75) were course-specific, and 6.4% were within a discipline or specific study program.

    “followed by studies within a specific department (21.6%, n = 61). Course-specific research accounts for 26.6% (n = 75) of the studies, and 6.4% of the studies were conducted within a discipline or a specific study program (5%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Combinations of synchronous collaboration tools with multimodal production tools (81%) and with LMS (68%) were strikingly higher than in the review by Bond, Buntins et al. (2020b), with 56% and 38% respectively.

    “Likewise, the combination of synchronous collaboration tools and multimodal production tools (81%), as well as the combination of synchronous collaboration tools and LMS (68%) was strikingly higher than that found in the review by Bond, Buntins et al. (2020b), with 56% and 38% respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bond, Buntins et al. (2020b)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the concept map of study titles and abstracts, 'students' had the most direct mentions (1343, 100% relative count), followed by pandemic (52% connectivity), e-learning (7%), classes (7%), social (7%), and data (6%).

    “The thematic summary reveals that students has the most direct mentions with 1343 (100% relative count), followed by pandemic (52% connectivity), e-learning (7%), classes (7%), social (7%) and data (6%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Synchronous collaboration tools were most often used with other technology types, combined with text-based tools in 86% of all possible cases, with multimodal production tools in 81%, and with social networking tools in 77%.

    “Synchronous collaboration tools was most often used with other technology types, being combined with text-based tools in 86% of all possible cases, with multimodal production tools in 81% of all possible cases, and with social networking tools in 77% of all possible cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The concept map indicates a focus on assessment, although the topic analysis found only 10% of studies with assessment as a research focus.

    “Interestingly, the map indicates a focus on assessment (see students-learning-online-teaching-assessment), although the topic analysis only found 10% of studies with assessment as a research focus; a potential area for further exploration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The majority of studies were carried out cross-sectionally and employed descriptive statistics rather than more complex analyses.

    “This finding is also in line with the fact that the majority of studies were carried out cross-sectionally, and employed descriptive statistics rather than more complex analyses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Studies that explicitly discussed online assessment tools mentioned student concerns about not completing tests in time and inflexible online quizzes, internet connections dropping out during tests, just-in-time quizzes on mobile devices, and educator concerns about online proctoring.

    “Studies that did explicitly discuss the use of online assessment tools mentioned student concerns around not completing tests in time and online quizzes being inflexible with answers (Dietrich et al., 2020), internet connections dropping out during tests and affecting completion (Means & Neisler, 2020), the use of ‘just in time’ quizzes delivered to students’ mobile devices (Chen et al., 2021),”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dietrich et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Means & Neisler, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chen et al., 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    14.5% of studies used interviews and 7.4% used student grades.

    “followed by interviews (14.5%) and students grades (7.4%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Surprisingly little research focused on student well-being (4.6%) and educator well-being (1.1%), or on teacher professional development (1.1%).

    “Surprisingly little research focused on student (4.6%) and educator well-being (1.1%), or on teacher professional development (1.1%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Sample sizes seemed to be equally distributed among the different study designs.

    “Sample sizes seemed to be equally distributed among the different study designs”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    'Online learning' was the most frequently used term (20.6%), while 'emergency remote teaching' was used relatively less often (5.3%).

    “Across the study corpus, ‘online learning’ was the most frequently used term (20.6%, see Table 6), with ‘emergency remote teaching’ being used relatively less often (5.3%)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The studies were predominantly focused on student perceptions of emergency remote education and online learning (60.6%).

    “The studies that were published in the first semester of the pandemic were predominantly focused on student perceptions of emergency remote education and online learning (see Table 7)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The omitted study design information ranged from student participants' study levels, to discipline/subjects under investigation, to whether 'first year' or 'introductory' referred to undergraduate or postgraduate students, to exact technology employed within courses.

    “This ranged from information about student participants’ study levels, to the discipline/ subjects under investigation, whether ‘first year’ or ‘introductory’ referred to undergraduate or postgraduate students, to information about the exact technology being employed within courses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Only a small number of studies referred to having employed more advanced educational technology, such as virtual worlds, simulations, e-portfolios or similar, as well as a smaller than expected focus on online and alternative methods of assessment.

    “Only a small number of studies referred to having employed more advanced educational technology, such as virtual worlds, simulations, e-portfolios or similar, as well as a smaller than expected focus on online and alternative methods of assessment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Academic collaboration in research occurred mostly with domestic colleagues and in teams working with two or three authors.

    “On the other hand, although the pandemic struck globally, academic collaboration in research occurred mostly with domestic colleagues and in teams working with two or three authors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Emergency remote teaching (ERT) is an unplanned practice in which any available offline and/or online resources are used.

    “The special feature of emergency remote education is that it is an unplanned practice, with no option than to use any kind of offline and/or online resources that may be at hand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bozkurt et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hodges et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review was conducted using explicit and transparent methods and guided by PRISMA reporting guidelines.

    “conducted using explicit and transparent methods (Gough et al., 2012; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2020), and guided by the PRISMA reporting guidelines (Page et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gough et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zawacki-Richter et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Page et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The first semester of 2020 marked a turning point in education, with the Covid-19 pandemic leading to a switch to online instruction.

    “Globally, the first semester of 2020 marked a turning point within education; the Covid-19 pandemic lead to the unprecedented situation of having to switch to online instruction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hodges et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    An initial five studies were coded by all four authors to ensure agreement on the coding scheme.

    “An initial five studies were coded by all four authors, in order to ensure agreement on the coding scheme.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review was pre-registered.

    “a systematic review was pre-registered (Händel, Bedenlier et al., 2020)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Händel, Bedenlier et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The review was conducted by four reviewers, and attempts were made to reduce bias and inconsistency, but the possibility of human flaw cannot be fully discounted.

    “The review was conducted by four reviewers and, whilst attempts were made to reduce bias and inconsistency (see Section “Inclusion/exclusion criteria”), the possibility of the human flaw of having overlooked or misinterpreted information cannot be fully discounted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of research from the Global South and Oceanic countries should be considered within the specific context of the pandemic, given variable infection numbers and varying national responses to COVID-19 in 2020.

    “However, this should be considered within the specific context of the pandemic, given the variable numbers of infections in those locations in 2020, as well as the varying national responses to COVID-19 and measures employed to fight the spread of the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Framing research within a stronger theoretical basis can assist with interpreting data and with identifying a field's disciplinary alignment.

    “Framing research within a stronger theoretical basis, can assist with interpreting data (Kaliisa & Picard, 2017) and with identifying a “field’s disciplinary alignment” (Crook, 2019, p. 486).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kaliisa & Picard, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Crook, 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The pandemic struck higher education unexpectedly, with swift decisions and actions enforced.

    “The pandemic struck higher education unexpectedly, with swift decisions and actions enforced (ERT; Hodges et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hodges et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The high number of articles from the Journal of Chemical Education is likely due to that journal opening a special issue call for papers in April 2020 that was published online in August.

    “This is likely due to that journal opening a special issue call for papers in April 2020 that was published online in August.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The review's search was limited to four large international databases and further repositories, and needs continuous updating.

    “Four large international databases were searched, as well as further repositories containing grey literature, and although articles written in both English and Spanish were explicitly searched for, and appropriate German language studies included, the search needs to be continuously updated”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The share of open access studies corresponds to the share of open access publication of K-12 research undertaken during the pandemic.

    “corresponding to the share of open access publication of K-12 research undertaken during the pandemic (Bond, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bond, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Quality appraisal of included studies was not conducted at this stage.

    “it was decided to map the available studies at this stage, prior to conducting further synthesis and quality assessment in future iterations of the review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    International databases mostly index journals that only accept submissions in English, so the number of papers written in English is much higher than other languages.

    “Regarding the latter, we have to acknowledge that international databases mostly index journals that only accept submissions in English, and therefore, the number of papers written in that language—even considering that these may come from authors in non-English speaking countries—is much higher than other languages (Tight, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tight, 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The design and conduct of the research itself could be considered as 'emergency remote research'.

    “Hence it could be said that, not only was the research focused on emergency remote teaching and learning, but also the design and conduct of the research itself could be considered as “emergency remote research” (Bond, 2020, p. 202).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bond, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses within higher education research address the topic of course design in 289 out of 515 identified cases of overview works.

    “With Tight (2020) showing that systematic reviews and meta-analyses within higher education research address the topic of course design in 289 out of 515 identified cases of overview works”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tight (2020)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of research found in the review may be related to two limitations: research could be indexed in other databases not analysed, or published in languages other than English and Spanish.

    “Also, this lack of research found in the review may also be related to two limitations of the study: research could be indexed in other databases that are not the ones analysed, or they could be published within their own languages, different from English and Spanish.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The popularity of learning management systems is in line with the majority of universities already having and using main institutional systems to some extent.

    “LMS were also popular in these publications (41.5%), which is in line with the use of the main institutional systems that the majority of universities already had and used to some extent (e.g. to upload materials).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Using the example of the Latin American publishing context, Beigel (2021) finds that within the so-called periphery, regional centres emerge.

    “Using the example of the Latin American publishing context, Beigel (2021) finds that within the so-called periphery, regional centres emerge, which calls for closer inspection of publication patterns within regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beigel (2021) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The finding that most authors' affiliation countries are located in Europe, Asia and North America echoes prior educational technology in higher education research.

    “a finding that echoes prior educational technology in higher education research (e.g., Bond et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bond et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The learning management system was used frequently and is potentially used more often for teaching and learning purposes, not solely as a file repository.

    “What is also evident in the reviewed studies, is that another educational technology tool that was used frequently—the learning management system—whilst not surprising, is interesting in the sense that it is potentially used more often for teaching and learning purposes, and not solely as a file repository (Brady & O’Reilly, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brady & O’Reilly, 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    The concept of online or digital learning can vary an extraordinary amount between contexts and studies.

    “The concept of online or digital learning can vary an extraordinary amount between contexts and studies, and in order for readers to understand and consider whether a study is applicable to their own situation, full study design details must be provided (Bond et al., 2020; Slavin, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bond et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Slavin, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Video conferencing has been around for thirty years and has experienced a surge in interest and broad application.

    “With video conferencing being around for thirty years (Bonk, 2020), it has certainly experienced a surge in interest and broad application, entailing other questions related to its use (Bedenlier et al., 2020; Castelli & Sarvary, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bonk, 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bedenlier et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Castelli & Sarvary, 2021 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The large number of studies published open access mirrors the relevance of initiatives such as the Open Covid Pledge for Research in Education.

    “The large number of studies published open access, mirrors the relevance of initiatives such as the Open Covid Pledge for Research in Education”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Conditions, semester timing and other factors varied from country to country.

    “In contrast, the conditions, semester timing and other factors, certainly varied from country to country (Bozkurt et al., 2020)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bozkurt et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The small number of studies using advanced educational technology and the smaller than expected focus on online and alternative assessment align with pre-pandemic use of educational technology.

    “Given the circumstances, this is perhaps not surprising, and also aligns with pre-pandemic use of educational technology (e.g., Bond et al., 2020b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bond et al., 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The educational technology most often employed-synchronous collaboration tools, especially video conferencing-is because teachers and students had the urge to re-create communication and interaction situations found during in-person lessons on campus, with a high potential of simulating face-to-face communication.

    “It can be surmised that the educational technology most often employed—synchronous collaboration tools, and especially video conferencing—is because of the fact that teachers and students had the urge to re-create communication and interaction situations that are found during in-person lessons on campus (Giovannella, 2021), with a high potential of simulating face-to-face communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giovannella, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Approximately one third of research omitted important study design information, as found in K-12 research during the early stages of the pandemic.

    “As found in K-12 research conducted during the early stages of the pandemic (Bond, 2020), approximately one third of research omitted important study design information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bond, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

58 of 58
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The terminology used in titles, abstracts, keywords or research questions is representative of the terminology used in the studies.

    “As the terminology was derived from either the wording in the title, abstract, keywords or research questions”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Researchers had relatively easy access to students at their respective institution due to their double function as teacher and researcher.

    “It can be assumed that researchers had – in their double-function as teacher and researcher – relatively easy access to students at their respective institution.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    At the outset of the first semester, larger numbers of teachers had not yet had extensive experience in providing other formats of online learning that make more use of the temporal flexibility inherent to online formats.

    “The use of video conferencing and the reliance on synchronous courses/meetings as part of online teaching and learning does, however, also indicate that at the outset of the first semester, larger numbers of teachers can be assumed to have not yet had extensive experience in providing other formats of online learning that make more use of the temporal flexibility inherent to online formats.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many universities had to move from presence teaching to online teaching rapidly.

    “Since many universities had to move from presence teaching to online teaching rapidly, many adopted video conference to replace the presence teaching traditional sessions.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increase in publications after COVID-19 is likely due to heightened need to understand student reactions to emergency remote education and increased availability of log data.

    “likely owing to the heightened need to understand how students were reacting to the shift to emergency remote education on the one hand, and the increased availability of log data on the other (Bond et al., 2021).”

    From Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Bond et al., 2021

    The Findings (Study focus; page unavailable) report that pandemic-era studies predominantly examined students’ perceptions of emergency remote education, and the Findings (Publication characteristics; page unavailable) describe a wave of publications peaking in August 2020. The paper does not attribute that publication pattern to a heightened need to understand student reactions, nor does it report increased availability of log data as a cause. Its data-collection discussion instead says most reviewed studies used online surveys. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only 67.7% of evidence synthesis in this sample were published open access, as opposed to 88.3% of higher education EdTech research published during the pandemic.

    “Related to the issue of global reach, only 67.7% of evidence synthesis in this sample were published open access, as opposed to 88.3% of higher education EdTech research published during the pandemic (Bond et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • A purportedly non-existent participant group has two studies

    Minor

    The text describes studies involving librarians with no other groups as non-existent, but gives their count as two.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Arndt, C., Ladwig, T., & Knutzen, S. (2020). Zwischen Neugier und Verunsicherung: Interne Hochschulbefragungen von Studierenden und Lehrenden im virtuellen Sommersemester 2020 [Between curiosity and uncertainty: Internal university surveys of students and lecturers in the virtual summer semester 2020]. Hamburg. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3090. · DOI
  2. Vallaster, C., & Sageder, M. (2020). Verändert Covid-19 die Akzeptanz virtueller Lehrformate in der Hochschulausbildung? Implikationen für die Hochschulentwicklung [Does Covid-19 change the acceptance of virtual teaching formats in higher education? Implications for Higher Education Development]. Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung, 15(4), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-15-04/16 · DOI
  3. *Please note that studies included within the review corpus are listed with an asterisk

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Universitat de Lleida (ES)
Corresponding author
Bond, Melissa
Venue
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Published
2021-08-30
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
50-50
ISSN
2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198139584
Cited by
527
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 198 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 13
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
agencia estatal de investigación (RYC2019-028398-I)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
emergency remote teaching, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, higher education, undergraduate students, educational technology use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review