Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester
Open accessAbstract
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic that spread globally in 2020, higher education courses were subsequently offered in fully remote, online formats. A plethora of primary studies began investigating a range of topics exploring teaching and learning in higher education, particularly during the initial semester. In order to provide an overview and initial understanding of this emerging research field, a systematic mapping review was conducted that collates and describes the characteristics of 282 primary empirical studies. Findings reveal that research was carried out mostly descriptively and cross-sectionally, focusing predominantly on undergraduate students and their perceptions of teaching and learning during the pandemic. Studies originate from a broad range of countries, are overwhelmingly published open access, and largely focused on the fields of Health & Welfare and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics . Educational technology used for emergency remote teaching are most often synchronous collaborative tools , used in combination with text-based tools . The findings are discussed against pre-pandemic research on educational technology use in higher education teaching and learning, and perspectives for further research are provided.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic mapping review collates 282 primary empirical studies on emergency remote teaching in higher education during the first global online semester of COVID-19. It finds research was mostly descriptive, cross-sectional, student-focused, and dominated by Health & Welfare and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics, with synchronous collaboration tools most used.
Key findings
- The review included 282 studies: 256 journal articles from 155 unique journals, 88.3% (n = 249) open access, authors from 73 countries and participants from 79 countries; the United States was the most prevalent author affiliation (23.4%, n = 66) and participant source (20.6%, n = 58).
- Most studies focused solely on higher education students (68.1%, n = 192), especially undergraduates (46.1%, n = 130); only 36 studies focused just on teachers/instructors (12.8%), and the top topic was student perceptions of online learning (60.6%, n = 171).
- Research was largely quantitative (53.6%, n = 151) and cross-sectional (92.2%, n = 260); 83% (n = 234) used online surveys, 80% (n = 227) reported descriptive statistics, and only 10.6% (n = 30) used a theoretical framework.
- Technology use was most often synchronous collaboration tools, especially video conferencing (51.8%), followed by LMS (41.5%), multimodal production tools (34.8%), and text-based tools (31.9%); assessment tools were 22.3%, lower than the 26.8% found in a pre-pandemic review.
Methods
- Systematic mapping review, pre-registered and PRISMA-guided, designed as a living systematic review; searches covered English, Spanish, and German studies using databases/platforms including Web of Science, Google Scholar, ERIC, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, Microsoft Academic Graph, Dialnet, Latindex, Redalyc, and CHELD V1.
- Initial search was 24 July 2020 with subsequent searches until the first week of December 2020; 11,686 items were identified, 1,740 duplicates removed, 9,946 title/abstract screened, 661 full-text screened, and 282 studies included; inter-rater agreement was Cohen’s k = 0.80 and k = 0.83.
- Data extraction coded publication/study characteristics, methodology, research focus, and technology using Bower’s typology; synthesis used tabulation and narrative description, Leximancer content analysis of English titles/abstracts (n = 262), and interactive evidence gap maps via EPPI-Mapper.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: the search needs continuous updating and additional databases such as FIS Bildung; special issues and institutional evaluations were not yet included; six journals were considered potentially predatory according to Beall’s List; no quality appraisal was conducted at this stage; human error in screening or coding cannot be fully discounted.
- Stated in the paper: the review is a first mapping attempt, and further synthesis and quality assessment are planned for future iterations.
- Evident from the text: Leximancer content analysis included English-language studies only (n = 262) despite trilingual inclusion; 55.7% (n = 157) did not report when data were collected; 18.8% did not formulate aims, research questions, or hypotheses; and 23.4% of studies had unclear participant discipline.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 37 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
46.1% (n = 130) of studies focused especially on undergraduates.
“especially undergraduates (46.1%, n = 130)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
2.5% of studies used (quasi-)experimental designs.
“2.5% of studies used (quasi-)experimental designs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Authors hailed from 73 different countries.
“hailing from 73 different countries”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Most collaboration between authors was domestic only (68.8%, n = 194).
“Most of the collaboration between authors were of a domestic only nature (68.8%, n = 194)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
16.3% of studies had sample sizes of up to 25 participants.
“16.3% of studies in the review had sample sizes of up to 25 participants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Four in every five studies (n = 227) reported using descriptive statistics to analyse their data.
“Four in every five studies (n = 227) reported using descriptive statistics to analyse their data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The majority of studies (83%, n = 234) used online surveys.
“the majority of studies (83%, n = 234) used online surveys for their research”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The review included 282 primary empirical studies.
“a systematic mapping review was conducted that collates and describes the characteristics of 282 primary empirical studies.”
- Also stated in: § Inclusion/exclusion criteria · plain
“282 studies being included for the initial map.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Inclusion/exclusion criteria · plain
- Findingown data
The Journal of Chemical Education published 36 articles, the highest number from one outlet.
“The Journal of Chemical Education published 36 articles, this being by far the highest number of articles sourced from one outlet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most studies (68.1%, n = 192) focused solely on the experiences and perspectives of higher education students.
“Most of the studies (68.1%, n = 192) focused solely on the experiences and perspectives of higher education students”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The United States was the most prevalent country affiliation (23.4%, n = 66).
“the United States was the most prevalent country (23.4%, n = 66)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Research on ERT in higher education during the pandemic was mostly descriptive.
“Findings reveal that research was carried out mostly descriptively and cross-sectionally”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only 36 studies (12.8%) focused just on teachers/instructors.
“Only 36 studies focused just on teachers/instructors (12.8%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 10.6% (n = 30) of studies used a theoretical framework.
“only 10.6% (n = 30) of studies in this sample used a theoretical framework”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More than half of the studies (55.7%, n = 157) did not include information as to when their data were collected.
“more than half of the studies included in the review (55.7%, n = 157) did not include information as to when their data were collected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Studies originated from a broad range of countries.
“Studies originate from a broad range of countries”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The vast majority were cross-sectional studies (92.2%, n = 260).
“The vast majority were cross-sectional studies (92.2%, n = 260)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
30.5% of studies employed qualitative data analyses.
“30.5% of studies employed qualitative data analyses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
5.3% (n = 15) of studies had a longitudinal study design.
“the studies with a longitudinal study design (5.3%, n = 15)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most authors' affiliation countries were located in Europe (27.7%), Asia (27.7%) and North America (25.5%).
“Most of the authors’ affiliation countries are located in Europe (27.7%), Asia (27.7%) and North America (25.5%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 40.8% of studies (n = 115), research was conducted with participants not sourced from a specific course, discipline or department.
“In 40.8% of studies (n = 115), research was conducted with participants who were not sourced from a specific course, discipline or department”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 20.6% of studies, participants came from the USA (n = 58).
“In 20.6% of studies, participants came from the USA (n = 58)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Educational technology used for ERT most often consisted of synchronous collaborative tools used in combination with text-based tools.
“Educational technology used for emergency remote teaching are most often synchronous collaborative tools, used in combination with text-based tools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
25.2% of studies had more than 400 participants.
“While 25.2% of the studies can be considered large, with more than 400 participants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The vast majority of studies (88.3%, n = 249) were available open access.
“The vast majority of studies (88.3%, n = 249) are available open access”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Research on ERT in higher education during the pandemic was mostly cross-sectional.
“Findings reveal that research was carried out mostly descriptively and cross-sectionally”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A total of 79 individual countries were represented in the corpus.
“A total of 79 individual countries are represented in the corpus”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Studies were overwhelmingly published open access.
“are overwhelmingly published open access”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
18.8% of studies did not appear to formulate any aims, research questions, or hypotheses.
“18.8% of studies did not appear to formulate any aims, research questions, or hypotheses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Research focused predominantly on undergraduate students.
“focusing predominantly on undergraduate students and their perceptions of teaching and learning during the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Studies largely focused on the fields of Health & Welfare and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics.
“largely focused on the fields of Health & Welfare and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is a noticeable lack of consideration of vulnerable populations such as international and SEND students as part of the general student body across the studies.
“with a noticeable lack of consideration of vulnerable populations such as international and SEND students as part of the general student body found across the studies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
To a lesser extent, studies focus on the perceptions of educators.
“and, to a lesser extent, on the perceptions of educators”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Research during the pandemic explored the quality of online teaching and learning.
“The map further reveals that research has sought to explore the quality of online teaching and learning (quality-e-learning-system-institutions-education-challenges)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most often mentioned type of tools were synchronous collaboration tools, especially video conferencing systems (51.8%).
“The most often mentioned type of tools were synchronous collaboration tools, especially video conferencing systems (e.g. Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, etc.) (51.8%, see Additional file 10: Appendix S10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 20.6% of the studies (n = 58), no specific technology, tools or devices were specified.
“However, in 20.6% of the studies (n = 58) no specific technology, tools or devices were specified, often using a phrase such as ‘online learning’ to refer to all forms of technology used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most studies that reported when data were collected had done so between March 2020 and June 2020.
“Most of those studies that reported when data were collected, had done so between March 2020 and June 2020”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The specific use of assessment tools was 22.3%, lower than the 26.8% found in a review of 242 pre-pandemic higher education studies.
“Interestingly, the specific use of assessment tools was only 22.3%, which was lower than that found in a review of 242 pre-pandemic higher education studies (Bond et al., 2020), at 26.8%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Text-based tools, especially email or instant messaging, had important presence (31.9%).
“Other typologies of tools with important presence were text-based tools (especially text-based communication such as email or instant messaging, 31.9%) and multimodal production tools (34.8%), particularly the use of teachers’ pre-recorded videos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
71 individual terms were used to describe ERT throughout the studies.
“The terminology used to describe ERT throughout the studies varied greatly, with 71 individual terms used”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only two studies focused specifically on students with special education needs and disabilities (SEND).
“Only two studies focused specifically on students with special education needs and disabilities (SEND)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
1.1% (n = 3) of studies were global studies.
“1.1% of studies (n = 3) can be considered as global studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
23.4% of studies had unclear discipline of participants.
“For 23.4% of the studies, the discipline of participants was unclear.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Learning management systems were popular in the publications (41.5%).
“LMS were also popular in these publications (41.5%), which is in line with the use of the main institutional systems that the majority of universities already had and used to some extent (e.g. to upload materials).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The scope of studies in this review overwhelmingly resides in the perceptions of students of the switch to online teaching and learning.
“Ensuing research, as collated per this review, indicates that the scope of studies overwhelmingly resides in the perceptions of students of the switch to online teaching and learning”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The studies in the corpus were published between January 2020 and October 2020.
“The current review encompasses studies published between January 2020 and October 2020”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Use of synchronous collaboration tools combined with text-based tools was much higher in this review (86%) than in a review of pre-pandemic higher education studies (69%).
“There was a much higher use of synchronous collaboration tools in combination with text-based tools in this review (86%), in comparison with 69% in a review of pre-pandemic higher education studies (Bond et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Research during the pandemic focused particularly on undergraduate and medical students.
“particularly that of undergraduate and medical students (see undergraduate-online-learning-activities and students-learning-online-medical)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most used theoretical framework was the Technology Acceptance Model.
“with the most used the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis, 1989 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
14.2% of the studies (n = 40) included exploration of the type of devices used by participants for teaching and learning.
“14.2% of the studies (n = 40) included the exploration of the type of devices used by the participants for teaching and learning, such as handheld device and internet access (e.g., Adnan & Anwar, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adnan & Anwar, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Research during the pandemic explored how students could be supported through digital technology.
“as well as how students could be supported through digital technology during the pandemic (see students-social-support-digital)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
This review mapped 282 studies conducted during the first ten months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
“This review mapped 282 studies conducted during the first ten months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Studies evaluated and considered the opinions, experiences and perceptions of stakeholders, particularly through surveys, but less so actual learning behaviour, grade differences or changes in study performance of students.
“That is, the opinions, experiences and perceptions of stakeholders were evaluated and considered, particularly through the use of surveys, but less so actual learning behaviour, grade differences or changes in study performance of students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Covid-19 pandemic led higher education courses to be offered in fully remote, online formats in 2020.
“Due to the Covid-19 pandemic that spread globally in 2020, higher education courses were subsequently offered in fully remote, online formats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hodges et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Inter-rater reliability for full-text screening was strong (Cohen's k = 0.83) after seven rounds of calibration and reconciliation.
“seven rounds of calibration and reconciliation were conducted (20, 20, 20, 20, 50, 100, and 140 items), resulting in strong agreement (Cohen’s k = 0.83)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Inter-rater reliability for title/abstract screening was substantial (Cohen's k = 0.80) after five rounds of comparison coding with 492 studies.
“Five rounds of comparison coding were conducted with 492 studies (100, 100, 92, 100 and 100), resulting in substantial agreement (Cohen’s k = 0.80)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McHugh, 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The increased use of video conferencing and pre-recorded videos during the pandemic becomes further apparent when tool combinations are compared to pre-pandemic research.
“The increased use of video conferencing and pre-recorded videos during the pandemic becomes even further apparent, when the combination of tools are considered in comparison to pre-pandemic research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher education research during the pandemic heavily focused on the experiences of students.
“The map confirms the findings of the topic analysis, indicating that higher education research has heavily focused on the experiences of students during the pandemic”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Many universities adopted video conferencing to replace traditional in-person teaching sessions.
“Since many universities had to move from presence teaching to online teaching rapidly, many adopted video conference to replace the presence teaching traditional sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many universities had to move from presence teaching to online teaching rapidly.
- Interpretationown data
Several results from this review are in line with pre-pandemic research in the field of educational technology.
“Whilst the overall topic of emergency remote teaching is driven by the current COVID-19 situation, several results from this review are in line with pre-pandemic research in the field of educational technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 38
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most frequent discipline of first authors was Health & Welfare (22.3%, n = 63), followed by Education (18.1%, n = 51) and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (16%, n = 45).
“the most frequent was Health & Welfare (22.3%, n = 63), followed by Education (18.1%, n = 51) and Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (16%, n = 45).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants mostly hailed from Asia (27.7%), North America (22.7%) and Europe (27.3%).
“Participants mostly hailed from Asia (n = 78, 27.7%), North America (n = 64, 22.7%) and Europe (n = 77, 27.3%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of studies were quantitative (53.6%, n = 151), 16.3% qualitative (n = 46), and 30.1% mixed methods (n = 85).
“The majority of studies were coded as quantitative research (n = 151, 53.6%), 16.3% of studies (n = 46) used a qualitative approach, and 30.1% (n = 85) were coded as mixed methods studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a first wave of publications that peaked in August 2020, after which monthly publications decreased.
“there was a first wave of publications that peaked in August 2020 (see Fig. 3). After September 2020, the number of monthly publications decreased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataResearch focused predominantly on students' perceptions of teaching and learning during the pandemic.
“focusing predominantly on undergraduate students and their perceptions of teaching and learning during the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data8.2% of studies did not explicitly mention how they undertook their analysis.
“8.2% did not explicitly mention in their report, how they undertook their analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe studies were published by 1,019 authors, mostly in teams of two or three.
“The studies in this review were published by 1,019 authors, mostly in teams of two or three”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe review included 256 published journal articles from 155 unique journals.
“The 256 published journal articles in this review were sourced from 155 unique journals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most researched disciplines were Health & Welfare (27.3%), Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (24.1%) and Education (16%).
“The most researched disciplines were Health & Welfare (27.3%), followed by Natural Sciences, Mathematics & Statistics (24.1%) and Education (16%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most often combined methods of data collection were surveys and interviews (8.5%, n = 24), followed by surveys and student grades (7.4%, n = 21).
“The most often combined methods of data collection were surveys and interviews (8.5%, n = 24), such as the study of Indian educators and postgraduate students by Mishra et al. (2020), followed by surveys and student grades (7.4%, n = 21)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data10.3% (n = 29) of studies included more than 6 authors.
“10.3% (n = 29) included more than 6 authors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data17.4% of studies were written by only one author, 10.3% were collaborations between international and domestic authors, and only 3.5% were international collaborations.
“17.4% were written by only one author, 10.3% were collaborations between international and domestic authors (two or more authors from the same country), and only 3.5% were published by international collaborations of authors from two or more completely different countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe global geographical distribution of authors and participants' country affiliations mirrors previous findings, with a noticeable lack of research coming from the Global South and Oceanic countries.
“The global geographical distribution of authors and participants’ country affiliations likewise mirrors previous findings (e.g., Bond et al., 2019), with a noticeable lack of research coming from the Global South and Oceanic countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data12.8% of studies had unclear first author discipline.
“For 36 studies (12.8%) it was not possible to identify the discipline of the first author.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMultimodal production tools had important presence (34.8%), particularly teachers' pre-recorded videos.
“Other typologies of tools with important presence were text-based tools (especially text-based communication such as email or instant messaging, 31.9%) and multimodal production tools (34.8%), particularly the use of teachers’ pre-recorded videos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data21.6% (n = 61) of studies were within a specific department, 26.6% (n = 75) were course-specific, and 6.4% were within a discipline or specific study program.
“followed by studies within a specific department (21.6%, n = 61). Course-specific research accounts for 26.6% (n = 75) of the studies, and 6.4% of the studies were conducted within a discipline or a specific study program (5%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCombinations of synchronous collaboration tools with multimodal production tools (81%) and with LMS (68%) were strikingly higher than in the review by Bond, Buntins et al. (2020b), with 56% and 38% respectively.
“Likewise, the combination of synchronous collaboration tools and multimodal production tools (81%), as well as the combination of synchronous collaboration tools and LMS (68%) was strikingly higher than that found in the review by Bond, Buntins et al. (2020b), with 56% and 38% respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond, Buntins et al. (2020b)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the concept map of study titles and abstracts, 'students' had the most direct mentions (1343, 100% relative count), followed by pandemic (52% connectivity), e-learning (7%), classes (7%), social (7%), and data (6%).
“The thematic summary reveals that students has the most direct mentions with 1343 (100% relative count), followed by pandemic (52% connectivity), e-learning (7%), classes (7%), social (7%) and data (6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSynchronous collaboration tools were most often used with other technology types, combined with text-based tools in 86% of all possible cases, with multimodal production tools in 81%, and with social networking tools in 77%.
“Synchronous collaboration tools was most often used with other technology types, being combined with text-based tools in 86% of all possible cases, with multimodal production tools in 81% of all possible cases, and with social networking tools in 77% of all possible cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe concept map indicates a focus on assessment, although the topic analysis found only 10% of studies with assessment as a research focus.
“Interestingly, the map indicates a focus on assessment (see students-learning-online-teaching-assessment), although the topic analysis only found 10% of studies with assessment as a research focus; a potential area for further exploration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe majority of studies were carried out cross-sectionally and employed descriptive statistics rather than more complex analyses.
“This finding is also in line with the fact that the majority of studies were carried out cross-sectionally, and employed descriptive statistics rather than more complex analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationStudies that explicitly discussed online assessment tools mentioned student concerns about not completing tests in time and inflexible online quizzes, internet connections dropping out during tests, just-in-time quizzes on mobile devices, and educator concerns about online proctoring.
“Studies that did explicitly discuss the use of online assessment tools mentioned student concerns around not completing tests in time and online quizzes being inflexible with answers (Dietrich et al., 2020), internet connections dropping out during tests and affecting completion (Means & Neisler, 2020), the use of ‘just in time’ quizzes delivered to students’ mobile devices (Chen et al., 2021),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown data14.5% of studies used interviews and 7.4% used student grades.
“followed by interviews (14.5%) and students grades (7.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSurprisingly little research focused on student well-being (4.6%) and educator well-being (1.1%), or on teacher professional development (1.1%).
“Surprisingly little research focused on student (4.6%) and educator well-being (1.1%), or on teacher professional development (1.1%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningSample sizes seemed to be equally distributed among the different study designs.
“Sample sizes seemed to be equally distributed among the different study designs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data'Online learning' was the most frequently used term (20.6%), while 'emergency remote teaching' was used relatively less often (5.3%).
“Across the study corpus, ‘online learning’ was the most frequently used term (20.6%, see Table 6), with ‘emergency remote teaching’ being used relatively less often (5.3%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe studies were predominantly focused on student perceptions of emergency remote education and online learning (60.6%).
“The studies that were published in the first semester of the pandemic were predominantly focused on student perceptions of emergency remote education and online learning (see Table 7)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe omitted study design information ranged from student participants' study levels, to discipline/subjects under investigation, to whether 'first year' or 'introductory' referred to undergraduate or postgraduate students, to exact technology employed within courses.
“This ranged from information about student participants’ study levels, to the discipline/ subjects under investigation, whether ‘first year’ or ‘introductory’ referred to undergraduate or postgraduate students, to information about the exact technology being employed within courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOnly a small number of studies referred to having employed more advanced educational technology, such as virtual worlds, simulations, e-portfolios or similar, as well as a smaller than expected focus on online and alternative methods of assessment.
“Only a small number of studies referred to having employed more advanced educational technology, such as virtual worlds, simulations, e-portfolios or similar, as well as a smaller than expected focus on online and alternative methods of assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAcademic collaboration in research occurred mostly with domestic colleagues and in teams working with two or three authors.
“On the other hand, although the pandemic struck globally, academic collaboration in research occurred mostly with domestic colleagues and in teams working with two or three authors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmergency remote teaching (ERT) is an unplanned practice in which any available offline and/or online resources are used.
“The special feature of emergency remote education is that it is an unplanned practice, with no option than to use any kind of offline and/or online resources that may be at hand.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bozkurt et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hodges et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe review was conducted using explicit and transparent methods and guided by PRISMA reporting guidelines.
“conducted using explicit and transparent methods (Gough et al., 2012; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2020), and guided by the PRISMA reporting guidelines (Page et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gough et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zawacki-Richter et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Page et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe first semester of 2020 marked a turning point in education, with the Covid-19 pandemic leading to a switch to online instruction.
“Globally, the first semester of 2020 marked a turning point within education; the Covid-19 pandemic lead to the unprecedented situation of having to switch to online instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hodges et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAn initial five studies were coded by all four authors to ensure agreement on the coding scheme.
“An initial five studies were coded by all four authors, in order to ensure agreement on the coding scheme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe review was pre-registered.
“a systematic review was pre-registered (Händel, Bedenlier et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Händel, Bedenlier et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe review was conducted by four reviewers, and attempts were made to reduce bias and inconsistency, but the possibility of human flaw cannot be fully discounted.
“The review was conducted by four reviewers and, whilst attempts were made to reduce bias and inconsistency (see Section “Inclusion/exclusion criteria”), the possibility of the human flaw of having overlooked or misinterpreted information cannot be fully discounted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of research from the Global South and Oceanic countries should be considered within the specific context of the pandemic, given variable infection numbers and varying national responses to COVID-19 in 2020.
“However, this should be considered within the specific context of the pandemic, given the variable numbers of infections in those locations in 2020, as well as the varying national responses to COVID-19 and measures employed to fight the spread of the pandemic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFraming research within a stronger theoretical basis can assist with interpreting data and with identifying a field's disciplinary alignment.
“Framing research within a stronger theoretical basis, can assist with interpreting data (Kaliisa & Picard, 2017) and with identifying a “field’s disciplinary alignment” (Crook, 2019, p. 486).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kaliisa & Picard, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Crook, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe pandemic struck higher education unexpectedly, with swift decisions and actions enforced.
“The pandemic struck higher education unexpectedly, with swift decisions and actions enforced (ERT; Hodges et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hodges et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe high number of articles from the Journal of Chemical Education is likely due to that journal opening a special issue call for papers in April 2020 that was published online in August.
“This is likely due to that journal opening a special issue call for papers in April 2020 that was published online in August.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe review's search was limited to four large international databases and further repositories, and needs continuous updating.
“Four large international databases were searched, as well as further repositories containing grey literature, and although articles written in both English and Spanish were explicitly searched for, and appropriate German language studies included, the search needs to be continuously updated”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe share of open access studies corresponds to the share of open access publication of K-12 research undertaken during the pandemic.
“corresponding to the share of open access publication of K-12 research undertaken during the pandemic (Bond, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningQuality appraisal of included studies was not conducted at this stage.
“it was decided to map the available studies at this stage, prior to conducting further synthesis and quality assessment in future iterations of the review.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationInternational databases mostly index journals that only accept submissions in English, so the number of papers written in English is much higher than other languages.
“Regarding the latter, we have to acknowledge that international databases mostly index journals that only accept submissions in English, and therefore, the number of papers written in that language—even considering that these may come from authors in non-English speaking countries—is much higher than other languages (Tight, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tight, 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe design and conduct of the research itself could be considered as 'emergency remote research'.
“Hence it could be said that, not only was the research focused on emergency remote teaching and learning, but also the design and conduct of the research itself could be considered as “emergency remote research” (Bond, 2020, p. 202).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSystematic reviews and meta-analyses within higher education research address the topic of course design in 289 out of 515 identified cases of overview works.
“With Tight (2020) showing that systematic reviews and meta-analyses within higher education research address the topic of course design in 289 out of 515 identified cases of overview works”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tight (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of research found in the review may be related to two limitations: research could be indexed in other databases not analysed, or published in languages other than English and Spanish.
“Also, this lack of research found in the review may also be related to two limitations of the study: research could be indexed in other databases that are not the ones analysed, or they could be published within their own languages, different from English and Spanish.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe popularity of learning management systems is in line with the majority of universities already having and using main institutional systems to some extent.
“LMS were also popular in these publications (41.5%), which is in line with the use of the main institutional systems that the majority of universities already had and used to some extent (e.g. to upload materials).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUsing the example of the Latin American publishing context, Beigel (2021) finds that within the so-called periphery, regional centres emerge.
“Using the example of the Latin American publishing context, Beigel (2021) finds that within the so-called periphery, regional centres emerge, which calls for closer inspection of publication patterns within regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beigel (2021) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe finding that most authors' affiliation countries are located in Europe, Asia and North America echoes prior educational technology in higher education research.
“a finding that echoes prior educational technology in higher education research (e.g., Bond et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe learning management system was used frequently and is potentially used more often for teaching and learning purposes, not solely as a file repository.
“What is also evident in the reviewed studies, is that another educational technology tool that was used frequently—the learning management system—whilst not surprising, is interesting in the sense that it is potentially used more often for teaching and learning purposes, and not solely as a file repository (Brady & O’Reilly, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brady & O’Reilly, 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationThe concept of online or digital learning can vary an extraordinary amount between contexts and studies.
“The concept of online or digital learning can vary an extraordinary amount between contexts and studies, and in order for readers to understand and consider whether a study is applicable to their own situation, full study design details must be provided (Bond et al., 2020; Slavin, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bond et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Slavin, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVideo conferencing has been around for thirty years and has experienced a surge in interest and broad application.
“With video conferencing being around for thirty years (Bonk, 2020), it has certainly experienced a surge in interest and broad application, entailing other questions related to its use (Bedenlier et al., 2020; Castelli & Sarvary, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe large number of studies published open access mirrors the relevance of initiatives such as the Open Covid Pledge for Research in Education.
“The large number of studies published open access, mirrors the relevance of initiatives such as the Open Covid Pledge for Research in Education”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConditions, semester timing and other factors varied from country to country.
“In contrast, the conditions, semester timing and other factors, certainly varied from country to country (Bozkurt et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bozkurt et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe small number of studies using advanced educational technology and the smaller than expected focus on online and alternative assessment align with pre-pandemic use of educational technology.
“Given the circumstances, this is perhaps not surprising, and also aligns with pre-pandemic use of educational technology (e.g., Bond et al., 2020b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond et al., 2020b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe educational technology most often employed-synchronous collaboration tools, especially video conferencing-is because teachers and students had the urge to re-create communication and interaction situations found during in-person lessons on campus, with a high potential of simulating face-to-face communication.
“It can be surmised that the educational technology most often employed—synchronous collaboration tools, and especially video conferencing—is because of the fact that teachers and students had the urge to re-create communication and interaction situations that are found during in-person lessons on campus (Giovannella, 2021), with a high potential of simulating face-to-face communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giovannella, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationApproximately one third of research omitted important study design information, as found in K-12 research during the early stages of the pandemic.
“As found in K-12 research conducted during the early stages of the pandemic (Bond, 2020), approximately one third of research omitted important study design information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bond, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The terminology used in titles, abstracts, keywords or research questions is representative of the terminology used in the studies.
“As the terminology was derived from either the wording in the title, abstract, keywords or research questions”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Researchers had relatively easy access to students at their respective institution due to their double function as teacher and researcher.
“It can be assumed that researchers had – in their double-function as teacher and researcher – relatively easy access to students at their respective institution.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
At the outset of the first semester, larger numbers of teachers had not yet had extensive experience in providing other formats of online learning that make more use of the temporal flexibility inherent to online formats.
“The use of video conferencing and the reliance on synchronous courses/meetings as part of online teaching and learning does, however, also indicate that at the outset of the first semester, larger numbers of teachers can be assumed to have not yet had extensive experience in providing other formats of online learning that make more use of the temporal flexibility inherent to online formats.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many universities had to move from presence teaching to online teaching rapidly.
“Since many universities had to move from presence teaching to online teaching rapidly, many adopted video conference to replace the presence teaching traditional sessions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The increase in publications after COVID-19 is likely due to heightened need to understand student reactions to emergency remote education and increased availability of log data.
“likely owing to the heightened need to understand how students were reacting to the shift to emergency remote education on the one hand, and the increased availability of log data on the other (Bond et al., 2021).”
From Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Bond et al., 2021
The Findings (Study focus; page unavailable) report that pandemic-era studies predominantly examined students’ perceptions of emergency remote education, and the Findings (Publication characteristics; page unavailable) describe a wave of publications peaking in August 2020. The paper does not attribute that publication pattern to a heightened need to understand student reactions, nor does it report increased availability of log data as a cause. Its data-collection discussion instead says most reviewed studies used online surveys. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOnly 67.7% of evidence synthesis in this sample were published open access, as opposed to 88.3% of higher education EdTech research published during the pandemic.
“Related to the issue of global reach, only 67.7% of evidence synthesis in this sample were published open access, as opposed to 88.3% of higher education EdTech research published during the pandemic (Bond et al., 2021).”
From A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024) · cites this paper as Bond et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
A purportedly non-existent participant group has two studies
MinorThe text describes studies involving librarians with no other groups as non-existent, but gives their count as two.
“or non-existent (librarians with no other groups, n = 2)”
“librarians with no other groups, n = 2”
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,305 · see citing works
Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic
McHugh, M. L. (2012) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2012.031 · Cited by 19,877 · see citing works
The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2024) · Handbook of Research in Online Learning · doi:10.1163/9789004702813_021 · Cited by 6,253 · see citing works
Self-citationThe PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2 · Cited by 5,177 · see citing works
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 · Cited by 2,669 · see citing works
Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 · Cited by 2,542 · see citing works
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1378 · Cited by 2,379 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These databases were chosen, as they are considered well-suited to evidence synthesis, with the Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOHost, for example, being found particularly useful in a recent review (Gusenbauer & Haddaway, 2019).”
MethodRapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y · Cited by 2,130 · see citing works
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective
Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208438 · Cited by 2,047 · see citing works
COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K. A., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B. H., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. M. S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7 · Cited by 1,954 · see citing works
Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students perspectives
Adnan, M. (2020) · Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology · doi:10.33902/jpsp.2020261309 · Cited by 1,925 · see citing works
Introduction to Systematic Reviews
(2013) · Active Learning Exercises · doi:10.21019/ale.2000.252 · Cited by 1,239 · see citing works
Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, J. D., et al. (2020) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3878572 · Cited by 1,207 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping
Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03192778 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al‐Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., et al. (2020) · UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3878571 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Self-citationBond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 · Cited by 1,097 · cited 4× · see citing works
“3%, which was lower than that found in a review of 242 pre-pandemic higher education studies (Bond et al., 2020), at 26.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationInfluence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education
Gonzalez, T., de la Rubia, M. A., Hincz, K. P., Comas-Lopez, M., Subirats, L., Fort, S., & Sacha, G. M. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239490 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap
Elliott, J. H., Turner, T., Clavisi, O., Thomas, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Mavergames, C., & Gruen, R. L. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Slavin, R. E. (2008) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08314117 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application
(2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7 · Cited by 467 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…rapidly emerging field of ERT in higher education, a systematic review was pre-registered (Händel, Bedenlier et al., 2020) and conducted using explicit and transparent methods (Gough et al., 2012; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2020), and guided by the PRISMA reporting guidelines (Page et al., 2020).”
MethodSelf-citationCastelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7123 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education
Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
Cutri, R. M., Mena, J., & Whiting, E. F. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1815702 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Facilitating Student Engagement Through Educational Technology: Towards a Conceptual Framework
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/jime.528 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal Perspectives on Higher Education
Altbach, P. G. (2016) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9781421419268 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
COVID-19 as a catalyst for educational change
Zhao, Y. (2020) · Prospects · doi:10.1007/s11125-020-09477-y · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Händel, M., Stephan, M., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kopp, B., Bedenlier, S., & Ziegler, A. (2022) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1846147 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationAttempts, Successes, and Failures of Distance Learning in the Time of COVID-19
Dietrich, N., Kentheswaran, K., Ahmadi, A., Teychené, J., Bessière, Y., Alfenore, S., Laborie, S., Bastoul, D., Loubière, K., Guigui, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00717 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Elumalai, K. V., N.A., J. P. S., Kalaichelvi, R., John, J. A., Menon, N. S., Alqahtani, M. S. M., & Abumelha, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/4628 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Where is the “theory” within the field of educational technology research?
Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12770 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Elsalem, L., Al‐Azzam, N. Z., Jum’ah, A. A., Obeidat, N. A., Sindiani, A., & Kheirallah, K. A. (2020) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.058 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education
Zawacki‐Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042023 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Bond, M., Zawacki‐Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12730 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2020.607286 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Bond, M. (2021) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4425683 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Self-citationLemon, L. L., & Hayes, J. L. (2020) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4222 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
(2017) · Murdoch University Research Portal · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Globalization and internationalization as frameworks for higher education research
Tight, M. (2021) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1633560 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Mosbah-Natanson, S., & Gingras, Y. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113498866 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Students’ Responses to Emergency Remote Online Teaching Reveal Critical Factors for All Teaching
Jeffery, K. A., & Bauer, C. F. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00736 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
A nationwide survey of online teaching strategies in dental education in China
Wang, K., Zhang, L., & Ye, L. (2020) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/jdd.12413 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Ahmed, S., Hegazy, N. N., Malak, H. W. A., Kayser, W. C., Elrafie, N. M., Hassanien, M. A., Al-Hayani, A. A., Saadany, S. A. E., AI-Youbi, A. O., & Shehata, M. H. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02311-1 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Tricco, A. C., Garritty, C., Boulos, L., Lockwood, C. S., Wilson, M., McGowan, J., McCaul, M., Hutton, B., Clement, F. M., Mittmann, N., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.029 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Educational Technology Research Patterns in the Realm of the Digital Knowledge Age
Bozkurt, A. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/jime.570 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The University as Center and Periphery
Altbach, P. G. (1981) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146818108200412 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Teachers’ Adoption of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education
Baas, M., Admiraal, W., & van den Berg, E. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Media in Education · doi:10.5334/jime.510 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Cross-Check for Completeness: Exploring a Novel Use of Leximancer in a Grounded Theory Study
Harwood, I. A., Gapp, R., & Stewart, H. (2015) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2191 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100068 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationIntroduction: Current tensions and trends in the World Scientific System
Beigel, F. (2014) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392114548640 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Deriving a typology of W eb 2.0 learning technologies
Bower, M. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12344 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors?
Bonk, C. J. (2020) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2020.1821610 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Butler-Henderson, K. A., Crawford, J., Rudolph, J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2020.3.2.11 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Jiao, J., & Hu, K. (2021) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijdet.20210101.oa1 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Bartz, J. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10090223 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Giovannella, C. (2020) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7383-5_9 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
COVID-19 and the Digital Transformation of Saudi Higher Education
Abdulrahim, H., & Mabrouk, F. (2020) · Asian journal of distance education · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Tight, M. (2019) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781474283779 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Constructing an Emergency Chinese Curriculum during the Pandemic: A New Zealand Experience
Wang, D., & East, M. (2020) · International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching · doi:10.46451/ijclt.2020.06.01 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Alturise, F. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110512 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Sharadgah, T. A., & Sa'di, R. A. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/4615 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Using Voice Assistants in Learning: A Study at the Time of COVID-19
Manzanares, M. C. S., Sánchez, R. M., & Ochoa-Orihuel, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17155618 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
(2012) · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Virtual Classrooms for Hearing-impaired Students during the Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic
Alsadoon, E., & Turkestani, M. (2020) · Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala · doi:10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/240 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Klegeris, A. (2020) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2020.1826036 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
A multi-scale perspective for assessing publishing circuits in non-hegemonic countries
Beigel, F. (2021) · Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society · doi:10.1080/25729861.2020.1845923 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Forced Shifting to e-Learning during the COVID-19 Outbreak: Information Quality, System Quality
Dwidienawati, D. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering · doi:10.30534/ijatcse/2020/93922020 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain
Fisk, K., Cherney, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Smith, A. (2012) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244012467788 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Marín, V. I., Duart, J. M., Galvis, Á. H., & Zawacki‐Richter, O. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0089-y · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationAdapting a Biochemistry Lab Course for Distance-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Scruggs, A. W., Leamy, K. A., Cravens, S. L., & Siegel, S. J. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00699 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Higher Education Research: The Developing Field
Tight, M. (2018) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
COVID-19 y espacios de aprendizaje universitarios. Tendencias en investigación.
González-Zamar, M.-D., Abad‐Segura, E., & Bravo, C. B. (2020) · IJERI International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation · doi:10.46661/ijeri.5126 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Open Access and Altmetrics in the pandemic age: Forescast analysis on COVID-19 literaturePreprint
Torres‐Salinas, D., Robinson‐García, N., & Castillo, P. Á. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.23.057307 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Knudson, D. V. (2020) · Sports Biomechanics · doi:10.1080/14763141.2020.1810306 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Seeking and sending signals: Remodelling teaching practice during the Covid-19 crisis
Littlejohn, A. H. (2020) · ACCESS Contemporary Issues in Education · doi:10.46786/ac20.8253 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Learning management systems and their impact on academic work
Brady, M., & O’Reilly, N. (2020) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2020.1743746 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Unmasking Inequality: STEM Course Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2020) · doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/102 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Núñez, J. R. R., & Leeuwner, J. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00781 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Digitale Kluft: Teilhabebarrieren für Studierende durch universitäres home learning?
Schmölz, A., Geppert, C., & Barberi, A. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.21243/mi-02-20-31 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
The “British” voice of educational technology research: 50th birthday reflection
Crook, C. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12757 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Open Access and Altmetrics in the pandemic age: Forescast analysis on COVID-19 related literature
Torres‐Salinas, D., García, N. R., & Castillo, P. Á. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3763139 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Emerging Trends of Emergency Remote Education in COVID-19: A Thematic Literature Review
Bhuwandeep, & Das, P. P. (2020) · Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research · doi:10.37534/bp.jhssr.2020.v2.ns.id1069.p5 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Syntheses of Higher Education Research
Tight, M. (2020) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350128767 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Marín, V. I., & Zawacki‐Richter, O. (2019) · Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research · doi:10.7821/naer.2019.7.393 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationEducational Technology trends in the Ibero-American world: 20 years of the Edutec-e journal
Marín, V. I., Zawacki‐Richter, O., Garcías, A. P., & Salinas, J. (2017) · Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa · doi:10.21556/edutec.2017.59.836 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Three-Iterative Design and Implementation of a Student-Facing Social Learning Analytics Tool
Ouyang, F., Li, X., Jiao, P., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijdet.286738 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Syntheses of Higher Education Research: What We Know
Tight, M. (2020) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Arndt, C., Ladwig, T., & Knutzen, S. (2020). Zwischen Neugier und Verunsicherung: Interne Hochschulbefragungen von Studierenden und Lehrenden im virtuellen Sommersemester 2020 [Between curiosity and uncertainty: Internal university surveys of students and lecturers in the virtual summer semester 2020]. Hamburg. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3090. · DOI
- Vallaster, C., & Sageder, M. (2020). Verändert Covid-19 die Akzeptanz virtueller Lehrformate in der Hochschulausbildung? Implikationen für die Hochschulentwicklung [Does Covid-19 change the acceptance of virtual teaching formats in higher education? Implications for Higher Education Development]. Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung, 15(4), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-15-04/16 · DOI
- *Please note that studies included within the review corpus are listed with an asterisk
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z · Cited by 852 · see citing works
“Related to the issue of global reach, only 67.7% of evidence synthesis in this sample were published open access, as opposed to 88.3% of higher education EdTech research published during the pandemic (Bond et al., 2021).”
ResultInfluentialSelf-citationUnpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review
Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationBedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100068 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationSum, M., & Oancea, A. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00364-4 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Student Engagement in Open, Distance, and Digital Education
Bond, M., & Bergdahl, N. (2022) · Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_79-1 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationThe development of augmented reality framework to enhance students’ motivation
Zain, F. M., Kasim, M., Rahman, F. A., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2026) · Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) · doi:10.11591/edulearn.v20i1.21294
- Authors
- Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Universitat de Lleida (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Bond, Melissa
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
- Published
- 2021-08-30
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-50
- ISSN
- 2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8403509
- OpenAlex
- W3198139584
- Semantic Scholar
- 73e0aac4497ec68adba870f8baf7b8e6a36ad02b
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 198 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 13
- FWCI
- 15.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2021-09-22)
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- agencia estatal de investigación (RYC2019-028398-I)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- emergency remote teaching, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, higher education, undergraduate students, educational technology use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review