Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal power flow solution in power systems using a novel Sine-Cosine algorithm

Attia, Abdel-Fattah, El Sehiemy, Ragab A., Hasanien, Hany M.·2018·International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.024
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the application of a novel algorithm, which is based on a modified Sine-Cosine technique for solving the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. It is a highly coupled non-linear constrained optimization problem. The modified Sine-Cosine algorithm (MSCA) aims at reducing the computational time with a sufficient improvement in finding the optimal solution and feasibility. Levy flights are added to the original Sine-Cosine algorithm to enhance the ability to focus on optimal and avoids local optima. Decreasing search agents number based on the objective function speeds up the MSCA. The MSCA presents a simple and robust solution for the OPF problem under different objective functions. The MSCA is validated with solving the OPF problem for a number of benchmark test systems, namely the IEEE-30 bus and IEEE 118-bus systems under selected objective functions, which are based on operational and economic performance indices of the power system. The proposed MSCA is compared with other optimization methods to illustrate the effectiveness and potential of the SCA and MSCA algorithms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.024

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Lee, 1985, A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch, IEEE Trans Power App Syst, 104, 1147, 10.1109/TPAS.1985.323466 · doi:10.1109/tpas.1985.323466
  2. Momoh, 1997, Challenges to optimal power flow, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 12, 444, 10.1109/59.575768 · doi:10.1109/59.575768
  3. Capitanescu, 2012, Critical review of recent advances and further developments needed in S. Frank, I. Steponavice, and S. Rebennack, “Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey I, Energy Syst, 3, 259
  4. Attia, 2012, Optimal power flow using adapted genetic algorithm with adjusting population size, Electr Power Compon Syst, 40, 1285, 10.1080/15325008.2012.689417 · doi:10.1080/15325008.2012.689417
  5. Bhattacharya, 2012, Solution of multi-objective optimal power flow using gravitational search algorithm, IET Gener Transm Distrib, 6, 751, 10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0593 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0593
  6. Jahan, 2013, Solution of large-scale security constrained optimal power flow by a new bi-level optimisation approach based on enhanced gravitational search algorithm, IET Gener Transm Distrib, 7, 1481, 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0697 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0697
  7. El-Sehiemy, 2016, Solving multi-objective optimal power flow problem via forced initialised differential evolution algorithm, IET Gener Transm Distrib, 10, 1634, 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0892 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0892
  8. El-Sehiemy, 2014, Multi-phase search optimisation algorithm for constrained optimal power flow problem, Int J Bio-Inspired Comput, 6
  9. Pulluri, 2016, A solution network based on stud krill herd algorithm for optimal power flow problems, Soft Comput, 1
  10. Bouchekara, 2016, Optimal power flow using an improved colliding bodies optimization algorithm, Appl Soft Comput, 42, 119, 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.041 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.041
  11. Niknam, 2012, Improved particle swarm optimisation for multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, loss, emission and voltage stability index, IET Gener Transm Distrib, 6, 515, 10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0851 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2011.0851
  12. Arul, 2013, Solving optimal power flow problems using chaotic self-adaptive differential harmony search algorithm, Electr Power Compon Syst, 41, 782, 10.1080/15325008.2013.769033 · doi:10.1080/15325008.2013.769033
  13. Bhattacharya, 2011, Application of biogeography-based optimisation to solve different optimal power flow problems, IET Gener Transm Distrib, 5, 70, 10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0237 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0237
  14. Ghanizadeh, 2011, Optimal power flow based on imperialist competitive algorithm, Int Rev Electr Eng, 6
  15. Warid, 2016, Optimal power flow using the Jaya algorithm, Energies, 9, 678, 10.3390/en9090678 · doi:10.3390/en9090678
  16. Bouchekara, 2014, Optimal power flow using differential search algorithm, Electr Power Compon Syst, 42, 1683, 10.1080/15325008.2014.949912 · doi:10.1080/15325008.2014.949912
  17. Bouchekara, 2014, Optimal power flow using teaching-learning-based optimization technique, Electr Power Syst Res, 114, 49, 10.1016/j.epsr.2014.03.032 · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2014.03.032
  18. Lai, 1997, Improved genetic algorithms for optimal power flow under both normal and contingent operation states, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 19, 287, 10.1016/S0142-0615(96)00051-8 · doi:10.1016/s0142-0615(96)00051-8
  19. Reddy, 2014, Faster evolutionary algorithm based optimal power flow using incremental variables, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 54, 198, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.019 · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.019
  20. Reddy, 2017, Optimal power flow with renewable energy resources including storage, Electr Eng, 99, 685, 10.1007/s00202-016-0402-5 · doi:10.1007/s00202-016-0402-5
  21. Reddy, 2017, Optimal power flow using clustered adaptive teaching learning-based optimisation, Int J Bio-Inspired Comput, 9, 226, 10.1504/IJBIC.2017.084316 · doi:10.1504/ijbic.2017.084316
  22. Bentouati, 2017, Elephant herding optimization for solving non-convex optimal power flow problem, J Electr Electron Eng, 10
  23. Abido MA. Multiobjective optimal power flow using strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. In: Proceedings of the universities power engineering conference (UPEC), Bristol, UK; 8 September 2004. p. 457–61.
  24. Kumari, 2010, Enhanced genetic algorithm based computation technique for multi-objective optimal power flow solution, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 32, 736, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.010 · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.010
  25. Reddy, 2017, Solution of multi-objective optimal power flow using efficient meta-heuristic algorithm, Electr Eng, 1
  26. Reddy, 2011, Reactive power price clearing using multi-objective optimization, Energy, 36, 3579, 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.070 · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.070
  27. Reddy, 2016, Security constrained optimal power flow with FACTS controllers using hybrid differential evolution and harmony search algorithm, Int J Appl Eng Res, 11, 10939
  28. Reddy, 2017, Differential evolution-based efficient multi-objective optimal power flow, Neural Comput Appl, 1
  29. Rajan, 2015, Optimal reactive power dispatch using hybrid Nelder-Mead simplex based firefly algorithm, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 66, 9, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.041 · DOI
  30. Chaib, 2016, Optimal power flow with emission and non-smooth cost functions using backtracking search optimization algorithm, Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 81, 64, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.004 · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.004
  31. Sindhu, 2017, Sine–cosine algorithm for feature selection with elitism strategy and new updating mechanism, Neural Comput Appl, 1
  32. Kumar, 2017, Peak power detection of PS solar PV panel by using WPSCO, IET Renew Power Gener, 11, 480, 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0733 · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0733
  33. Hu, 2016, A multi-verse optimizer with levy flights for numerical optimization and its application in test scheduling for network-on-chip, PLoS ONE, 11, e0167341, 10.1371/journal.pone.0167341 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167341
  34. Attia, 2009, A modified genetic algorithm for precise determination the geometrical orbital elements of binary stars, New Astron, 14, 285, 10.1016/j.newast.2008.08.005 · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2008.08.005

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Attia, A.-F., El Sehiemy, R. A., & Hasanien, H. M.
Venue
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
99
Pages
331-343
ISSN
0142-0615 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.024
OpenAlex
W2790106051
Cited by
361
References
21
FWCI
14.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal power flow solution in power systems using a novel Sine-Cosine algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.024
The paper
Attia, A.-F., El Sehiemy, R. A., & Hasanien, H. M. (2018). Optimal power flow solution in power systems using a novel Sine-Cosine algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.01.024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.