Cited by 236Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Engaging with others' mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers instructional practices, and learning

Webb, Noreen M., Franke, Megan L., Ing, Marsha, Wong, Jacqueline, Fernandez, Cecilia H., Shin, Nami, Turrou, Angela C.·2014·International Journal of Educational Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual student participation is positively linked to individual student achievement.

    “The study found a positive link between student participation and achievement.”
  • Our findings are more in line with the perspective that classroom discourse affects different students in a class in different ways, depending on how actively they participate.

    “Our findings are thus more in line with the perspective, previously outlined by the studies of Webb et al. (2014) and Ing et al. (2015), that classroom discourse affects different students in a class in different ways, depending on how actively they participate.”
  • Engagement was not examined in the studies by Inagaki et al. (1998), O'Connor et al. (2017), Webb et al. (2014), Ing et al. (2015), Sedova et al. (2019), and Larrain et al. (2019).

    “We cannot infer this, as engagement was not examined in these studies.”
  • Students who more often developed their own ideas in conversation and explained their ideas to others achieved better results in standardized mathematics tests.

    “The findings indicated that the students who more often developed their own ideas in conversation and explained their ideas to others achieved better results in those tests.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Webb, Noreen M.
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014
Volume
63
Pages
79-93
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004539500
Cited by
236
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
59.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • R305A100181
  • Institute of Education Sciences of the U.S. Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student participation, classroom discourse, teacher instructional practices, student learning, primary school mathematics, small group discussion, whole-class discussion, problem-solving strategies, academic performance, teacher follow-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review