Do question prompts support students in working with peer feedback?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deficiency in providing constructive feedback can engender a lack of trust among students in receiving constructive feedback from peers, impairing engagement and reducing efficacy of peer feedback.
“This deficiency has the potential to engender a lack of trust among students in receiving constructive feedback from their peers (Jurkowski, 2018; Pugh and Veitch, 2019), ultimately impairing their engagement and reducing the efficacy of the peer feedback practice (Álvarez et al., 2015; Jurkowski, 2018).”
From Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: a systematic review of benefits and challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Jurkowski, 2018
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups
Cohen, E. G. (1994) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543064001001 · Cited by 2,120 · see citing works
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Topping, K. J. (2009) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840802577569 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols
Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(03)00074-0 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920902894070 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2021) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: a systematic review of benefits and challenges
Wei, Y., & Liu, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1506725 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…is on the extent to which the feedback received has been implemented and the extent to which the initial task solution has improved as a result (e.g., essay scoring rubric; Altstaedter, 2016; integration of received feedback via comparison of initial and revised task solution; Jurkowski, 2018).”
Influential
- Authors
- Jurkowski, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jurkowski, Susanne
- ORCID
- Jurkowski, Susanne
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 92
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883829458
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- peer feedback, question prompts, academic writing, feedback integration, university students, writing performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
