A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum
Abstract
This study examines whether peer feedback can be a substitute for teacher feedback and which measures can be taken to improve its effectiveness. A pre‐test post‐test control group design examined the long‐term learning effects of individual peer feedback and of collective teacher feedback on writing assignments in secondary education. Moreover, it examined the added value of a priori question forms and a posteriori reply forms aimed at supporting the assessee's response to peer feedback. The study supports the ‘non‐inferiority’ hypothesis of there being no significant difference in students’ progress after plain substitutional peer feedback or teacher feedback. Both groups (plain peer feedback and teacher feedback), however, improved significantly less than the groups that worked with question or reply forms, confirming the added‐value of these forms. Almost half of the students found the received peer feedback helpful, but less than a quarter considered giving feedback an aid in their own learning process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a difference between teacher feedback and peer feedback as teachers are more subject-matter experts and need less support in providing feedback.
“According to the literature, there is a difference between teacher feedback and peer feedback as teachers are more subject-matter experts with lots of feedback experiences and knowledge, and compared to students they need less support in providing feedback (Gielen et al., 2010; Paulus, 1999).”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Gielen et al., 2010
Cites
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Both are outcomes of formative assessment, also called assessment for learning (Black & Wiliam, 1998 ).”
BackgroundPeer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The effectiveness of peer feedback as such could be derived from a recent meta‐analysis on ‘peer assistance when writing’ (grade 4 through high school) by Graham and Perin ( 2007 ), who found a large positive effect size compared to students writing alone.”
BackgroundSustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society
Boud, D. (2000) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/713695728 · Cited by 1,545 · see citing works
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005) · Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory
Sadler, D. R. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050104 · Cited by 1,107 · see citing works
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Previous research on peer and teacher feedback in first language writing education identifies the beneficial effects of peer comments and proves them to be of equal or even greater effect than teacher comments (Tsui & Ng, 2000 ).”
BackgroundImproving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes
Rust, C., Price, M., & O’Donovan, B. M. (2003) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930301671 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility
Topping, K. J. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology
Richardson, J. T. E., Eysenck, M. W., & Piper, D. W. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2002) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293022000001337 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts?
Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586965 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088306289261 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs
van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930500262346 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
An inventory of peer assessment diversity
Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930903221444 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationSearby, M., & Ewers, T. (1997) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293970220402 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Research on Cooperative Learning: an international perspective
Slavin, R. E. (1989) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/0031383890330401 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment
Pope, N. K. (2004) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293042003243896 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Change in self-perceived competence as a function of peer and teacher evaluation
Cole, D. A. (1991) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.682 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Kember, D. R. (2003) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930301684 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand‐Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2002) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(03)90003-4 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education
Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Prins, F. J. (2006) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.01.005 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training
Min, H.-T. (2008) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.002 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Pope, N. K. (2001) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930120052396 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Student involvement in assessment. The training of peer assessment skills.
Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2002) · DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement
Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1325555.1325571 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The Effects of Peer Editing on the Writing Proficiency of Low-Achieving Tenth Grade Students
Karegianes, M. L., Pascarella, E. T., & Pflaum, S. W. (1980) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.1980.10885236 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Struyven, K., Dochy, F. J. R. C., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2008) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-008-9041-8 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistical Tables, Explained and Applied
Laurencelle, L., & Dupuis, F.-A. (2002) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/4935 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Deepening computer programming skills by using web-based peer assessment
Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. S. (2003) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Statistical Tables, Explained and Applied
Laurencelle, L., & Dupuis, F.-A. (2002) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789812777669 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation
Mulder, R. A., Pearce, J. M., & Baik, C. (2014) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787414527391 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process
Baker, K. M. (2016) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787416654794 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Student – Feedback Interaction Model: Revised
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2022) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101208 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Effects of Peer E-Feedback on Turkish EFL Students' Writing Performance
Çiftçi, H., & Koçoğlu, Z. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.46.1.c · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Effect of teacher modeling and feedback on EFL students’ peer review skills in peer review training
Min, H. (2016) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Valdivia, I. M. Á., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835772 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Agricola, B. T., Prins, F. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1688764 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Students’ feedback beliefs and anxiety in online foreign language oral tasks
Martin, S., & Valdivia, I. M. Á. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0056-z · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Jahin, J. H. (2012) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n11.3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The effect of feedback on metacognition-a randomized experiment using polling technology
Molin, F., Haelermans, C., Cabus, S., & Groot, W. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103885 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment
Adachi, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Anonymity in Blended Learning: Who Would You like to Be?
Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. D. (2011) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 58 · see citing works
E-portfolios supporting primary students' writing performance and peer feedback
Nicolaidou, I. A. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Bolzer, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12091 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
The effects of autonomy support on student engagement in peer assessment
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9538-x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Effective Feedback Design Using Free Technologies
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115571929 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Scaffolding peer-assessment skills: Risk of interference with learning domain-specific skills?
Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M. J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.007 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
The Edumetric Quality of New Modes of Assessment: Some Issues and Prospects
Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_6 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, Z., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. M. (2022) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2021-0078 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Secondary Students' Perceptions of Peer Review of Writing
Loretto, A., DeMartino, S., & Godley, A. (2016) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte201628872 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Peer Feedback on Collaborative Learning Activities in Veterinary Education
Dooley, L. M., & Bamford, N. J. (2018) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci5040090 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Ludemann, P. M., & McMakin, D. (2014) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.129 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ritonga, M., Tazik, K., Omar, A., & Dehkordi, E. S. (2022) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-022-00188-z · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Emergence and outlook of competence-based education in European education systems: an overview
Tchibozo, G. (2011) · HAL · doi:10.1080/17496896.2010.556487 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Rijdt, C. D., van der Rijt, J., Dochy, F. J. R. C., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9173-6 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationVattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2023.2192772 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Lam, S. T. E. (2021) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102666 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Eriksson, E., Boistrup, L. B., & Thornberg, R. (2016) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2016.1225787 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Öztürk, M., Yüce, E., & Türker, P. M. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-024-09812-8 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Do question prompts support students in working with peer feedback?
Jurkowski, S. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.07.003 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Triangulation of language assessment modes: learning benefits and socio-cognitive prospects
Ghahari, S., & Farokhnia, F. (2017) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2017.1342540 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Effect of the Peer-Review Technique on Students’ Writing Ability
Kustati, M., & Yuhardi, Y. (2014) · Studies in English Language and Education · doi:10.24815/siele.v1i2.2671 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Developing Business Management Students' Persuasive Writing Through Blog-based Peer-Feedback
Sayed, O. H. (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v3n3p54 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Trabelsi, O., Gharbi, A., Masmoudi, L., & Mrayeh, M. (2020) · Acta Gymnica · doi:10.5507/ag.2020.014 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Voet, M., Gielen, M., Boelens, R., & Wever, B. D. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0345-x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Universitas Negeri Malang, E. J., Hentasmaka, D., Cahyono, B. Y., & Universitas Negeri Malang, E. J. (2021) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2021.14316a · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Grade one peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Peterson, S. S., & Portier, C. (2012) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.670256 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Boon, S. (2016) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2014.901984 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bijami, M., Pandian, A., & Singh, M. K. M. (2016) · International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.1p.59 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Concept Mapping: Providing Assessment of, for, and as Learning
Chen, W., & Allen, C. (2017) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-016-0365-1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Moltudal, S. H., Gamlem, S. M., Segaran, M., & Engeness, I. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1509904 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Alnasser, S. M. N. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221123021 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Investigating Students’ Perceptions of Screencasting Style of Video Feedback in Online Courses
Lowenthal, P. R., Fiock, H. S., Shreaves, D., & Belt, E. S. (2021) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-021-00665-x · Cited by 12 · see citing works
University Students’ Perceptions of Peer Assessment in Oral Presentations
Zahinos, D. G., Sánchez, M. J. F., Tráver, M. T. B., & Herrera, S. S. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14030221 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Berry, D. N., Taylor, M. L., Nicolai, K. D., Koenka, A. C., Barnes, N., de Oliveira, L. C., & Zumbrunn, S. K. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102022 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Knowledge convergence among pre-service mathematics teachers through online reciprocal peer feedback
Chen, W. (2017) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2017.09.001 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Rapp, C., Kruse, O., Erlemann, J., & Ott, J. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2685553.2702687 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Chen, F., & Andrade, H. (2016) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1255870 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Ning, Y., Seah, W. T., Chen, J., Liu, J., & Tan, P. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105572 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Interactive Learning with Student Response System to Encourage Students to Provide Peer Feedback
Sitthiworachart, J., Joy, M. S., & Ponce, H. R. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13030310 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Effect of teacher and peer written corrective feedback on writing components in EFL classrooms
Elfiyanto, S., & Fukazawa, S. (2020) · JEES (Journal of English Educators Society) · doi:10.21070/jees.v5i2.826 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Burhanuddin, B., & Arrafii, M. A. (2022) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-022-09806-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Boon, S. (2015) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2013.856930 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The provision and efficacy of peer feedback in blogs versus paper-based writing
Lira-Gonzales, M.-L., & Nassaji, H. (2019) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/itl.19011.lir · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group StudiesPreprint
Double, K. S. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.31234/osf.io/c4rkv · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Modeling Student Evaluations of Writing and Authors as a Function of Writing Errors
Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Patchan, M. M., Chen, D., & Johnson, A. C. (2020) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2020.10316 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Communication Roulette: Engaging Students in the Practice of Tailored Communication
Fulmer, B. P., Fulmer, S., & Liu, Y. (2021) · Issues in Accounting Education · doi:10.2308/issues-19-078 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Akongoh, R. N. (2021) · Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics · doi:10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.2.1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Pozzi, F., Ceregini, A., Ferlino, L., & Persico, D. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2107 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Using digital formative assessments to improve learning in physics education
Molin, F. (2021) · doi:10.26481/dis.20220114fm · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The Effect of Feedback on Informative Text Writing: AI or Teacher?
Baz, M. A., & Hasırcı, S. (2025) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.17.3.871 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Designing Dialogic Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: The Role of Thinq Tank
Hoe, A. V., Wiebe, J. P., Slotta, J., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14111231 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mauri, A. J., & de Figueiredo, J. N. (2025) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/10525629241313196 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Rubric for Peer Evaluation of Multi-User Virtual Environments for Education and Training
Lazou, C., Tsinakos, A. A., & Kazanidis, I. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16030174 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Feedback for writing or writing for feedback
TEHRANİ, F. A. (2018) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Developing a system to increase motivation and engagement in student code peer review
Ada, M. B., & Majid, M. U. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale54877.2022.00023 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Min, H., & Chiu, Y.-M. (2021) · English Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1007/s42321-021-00094-2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
44 IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING: WHY IS THERE A NEED FOR TEACHER FEEDBACK
Jerry, C., Jan, J. M., & Samuel, M. S. G. (2013) · Malaysian Journal of Languages and Linguistics (MJLL) · doi:10.24200/mjll.vol2iss1pp44-55 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Network-Based Peer Evaluation Strategy
Elkot, M. A. (2017) · International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science · doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2017.04.04 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fong, C. J., Schallert, D. L., Lin, S., & Altan, S. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101351 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Effective Use of Peer-feedback in Developing Academic Writing Skills of Undergraduate Students
Mon, Y. Y., & Zein, S. (2017) · Language Education in Asia · doi:10.5746/leia/17/v8/i2/a04/mon_zein · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hoa, N. T. N., & Lap, T. Q. (2021) · European Journal of Education Studies · doi:10.46827/ejes.v8i10.3926 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Effects of Trained Peer Feedback for High School Students
Ho, P. V. P., Le, T. C., Phan, T. H., & Nguyen, N. H. V. (2021) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n1p27 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Measuring Peer Feedback on Writing Class: A Study on Third-Semester Pre-Service English Teachers
Sumekto, D. R., & Setyawati, H. (2019) · Lingua Cultura · doi:10.21512/lc.v13i1.5058 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Challenges in Education – Policies, Practice and Research
Clipa, O. (2021) · Peter Lang D eBooks · doi:10.3726/b19119 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Support Student Integration of Multiple Peer Feedback on Research Writing in Thesis Circles
Hsiao, Y. P., & Rajagopal, K. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
STUDENTS PREPAREDNESS TOWARDS WRITING A BACHELOR THESIS; A SURVEY-BASED INVESTIGATION
Heimdal, A., Svennevig, P. R., & Norheim, T. (2021) · International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE) · doi:10.35199/epde.2021.76 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Alnasser, S. M. N. (2018) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.060804 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Suryani, R. W., Rozimela, Y., & Anwar, D. (2019) · International Journal of Secondary Education · doi:10.11648/j.ijsedu.20190704.14 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Heimdal, A., Thorstensen, R. T., & Svennevig, P. R. (2020) · International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE) · doi:10.35199/epde.2020.54 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Almuadi, M., & Barr, M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4246-2_19 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Okumuş, S., & Doymuş, K. (2020) · Kalem Uluslararasi Egitim ve Insan Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.23863/kalem.2020.150 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Complementary Teaching Strategies Anchored in the Peer-Assisted Learning Model
Rosencrum, E., Hildebrand, E. E., Negron, M., & Adkinson, C. (2021) · Athletic Training Education Journal · doi:10.4085/1947-380x-20-87 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Saeed, M. A., AbuSa’aleek, A. O., & Qunayeer, H. S. A. (2022) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v11i3.34600 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hsiao, T., Chuang, Y.-H., Chang, C., Chen, T., Zhang, H., & Chang, J.-C. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231217715 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A comparative study on assessment methods used by high school teachers in Uganda and Turkey
Wood, P. C., & Doğan, C. D. (2024) · Research in Comparative and International Education · doi:10.1177/17454999241256447 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hamdy, Ahmed, & Abdelaziz (2014) · 通讯和计算机：中英文版 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Alnasser, S. M. N., & Alyousef, H. S. (2014) · International Journal of English Language Education · doi:10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6764 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Peer Evaluation as an Effec tive Tool to Improve Twelfth-Gr ade Students' Writing
Ebersviller, J. R. (2013) · Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hint, H., & Jürine, A. (2021) · Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri = Estonian Journal of Education · doi:10.12697/eha.2021.9.1.10 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Gielen, Sarah
- ORCID
- Onghena, Patrick
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-162
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W2154733194
- Semantic Scholar
- fc58e55e2c811221edfb4f7a82df2ede5bc6615c
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 17.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, teacher feedback, writing instruction, high school students, writing assessment, student perceptions of feedback, long-term learning effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
