Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic diversity and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus equorum isolated from naturally fermented sausages and their manufacturing environment

Leroy, Sabine, Lebert, Isabelle, Chacornac, Jean-Paul, Chavant, Patrick, Bernardi, Thierry, Talon, Régine·2009·International Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

S. equorum is often isolated from naturally fermented sausages and from the environment of processing units. The aim of this work was first to characterize the genetic diversity of this species in a single small processing unit manufacturing traditional sausages without the use of starter cultures. One hundred and eighteen S. equorum isolates were collected from meat products and surfaces of this unit. Secondly, the capacity to form biofilm of 57 isolates of S. equorum selected from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles was assessed to determine if this property conferred an advantage for the colonization of surfaces in the processing unit. Characterization of the isolates by PFGE analysis revealed a high diversity of the strains with 52 distinct PFGE patterns detected in this limited environment. It showed also that the exchanges between meat products and environmental surfaces could be limited or that the strains could be adapted to a specific niche as only four strains out of the 52 identified colonized both niches. The majority of the S. equorum strains formed biofilm; this was determined using a validated test on polystyrene microplates. This ability was not correlated with their origin, meat products or environmental surfaces.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.012

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lebert, 2007, Microorganisms in traditional fermented meats — chapter 11, 113

Cited by

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
Leroy, S., Lebert, I., Chacornac, J.-P., Chavant, P., Bernardi, T., & Talon, R.
Affiliations
Microbiologie Environnement Digestif Santé (FR)
Venue
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
134
Issue
1-2
Pages
46-51
ISSN
0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019936414
Cited by
56
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
Staphylococcus equorum, genetic diversity, biofilm formation, meat processing environment, surface colonization, niche adaptation
MeSH terms
Animals, Environmental Microbiology, Fermentation, Food Microbiology, Food-Processing Industry, Humans, Meat Products, Staphylococcus, Swine, Genetic Variation, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic diversity and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus equorum isolated from naturally fermented sausages and their manufacturing environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.012
The paper
Leroy, S., Lebert, I., Chacornac, J.-P., Chavant, P., Bernardi, T., & Talon, R. (2009). Genetic diversity and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus equorum isolated from naturally fermented sausages and their manufacturing environment. International Journal of Food Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.