The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weak-acid preservatives: pH and proton movements in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Abstract
Weak-acid preservatives commonly used to prevent fungal spoilage of low pH foods include sorbic and acetic acids. The "classical weak-acid theory" proposes that weak acids inhibit spoilage organisms by diffusion of undissociated acids through the membrane, dissociation within the cell to protons and anions, and consequent acidification of the cytoplasm. Results from 25 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae confirmed inhibition by acetic acid at a molar concentration 42 times higher than sorbic acid, in contradiction of the weak-acid theory where all acids of equal pK(a) should inhibit at equimolar concentrations. Flow cytometry showed that the intracellular pH fell to pH 4.7 at the growth-inhibitory concentration of acetic acid, whereas at the inhibitory concentration of sorbic acid, the pH only fell to pH 6.3. The plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase proton pump (Pma1p) was strongly inhibited by sorbic acid at the growth-inhibitory concentration, but was stimulated by acetic acid. The H⁺-ATPase was also inhibited by lower sorbic acid concentrations, but later showed recovery and elevated activity if the sorbic acid was removed. Levels of PMA1 transcripts increased briefly following sorbic acid addition, but soon returned to normal levels. It was concluded that acetic acid inhibition of S. cerevisiae was due to intracellular acidification, in accord with the "classical weak-acid theory". Sorbic acid, however, appeared to be a membrane-active antimicrobial compound, with the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase proton pump being a primary target of inhibition. Understanding the mechanism of action of sorbic acid will hopefully lead to improved methods of food preservation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We examined growth at pH 5.0, a value above the pKa of the acid, where the charged anionic form (CH3COO-) acts as a nutrient rather than the undissociated acid (CH3COOH) conferring a weak acid stress (Casal et al., 2008; Stratford et al., 2013).”
From Candida glabrata susceptibility to antifungals and phagocytosis is modulated by acetate (2015) · cites this paper as Stratford et al., 2013
Citations
Cites
Pitt, J. I., & Hocking, A. D. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-92207-2 · Cited by 4,544
Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons
Sikkema, J., de Bont, J. A., & Poolman, B. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.2.201-222.1995 · Cited by 2,685
Fatty Acids and Derivatives as Antimicrobial Agents
Kabara, J. J., Swieczkowski, D. M., Conley, A. J., & Truant, J. P. (1972) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.2.1.23 · Cited by 795
A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome
Breslow, D. K., Cameron, D. M., Collins, S. R., Schuldiner, M., Stewart-Ornstein, J., Newman, H. W., Braun, S. J., Madhani, H. D., Krogan, N. J., & Weissman, J. S. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1234 · Cited by 536
Kurtzman, C. P. (2003) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1016/s1567-1356(03)00175-2 · Cited by 464
The Where, When, and How of Organelle Acidification by the Yeast Vacuolar H + -ATPase
Kane, P. M. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.70.1.177-191.2006 · Cited by 390
Studies on the mechanism of the antifungal action of benzoate
Krebs, H. A., Wiggins, D., Stubbs, M., Sols, A., & Bedoya, F. J. (1983) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2140657 · Cited by 388
The Pdr12 ABC transporter is required for the development of weak organic acid resistance in yeast
Piper, P. W., Mahé, Y., Thompson, S., Pandjaitan, R., Holyoak, C., Egner, R., Mühlbauer, M., Coote, P., & Kuchler, K. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.15.4257 · Cited by 356
Vacuolar and plasma membrane proton pumps collaborate to achieve cytosolic pH homeostasis in yeast
Martínez-Muñoz, G. A., & Kane, P. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m710470200 · Cited by 257
Effects of beta-pinene on yeast membrane functions
Uribe, S., Ramirez, J., & Peña, A. (1985) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.161.3.1195-1200.1985 · Cited by 255
Holyoak, C. D., Stratford, M., McMullin, Z., Cole, M., Crimmins, K., Brown, A. J. P., & Coote, P. J. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.9.3158-3164.1996 · Cited by 254
Self-citationVacuolar and plasma membrane proton pumps collaborate to achieve cytosolic pH homeostasis in yeast.
Martínez‐Muñoz, G. A., & Kane, P. M. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.a117.710470 · Cited by 219
Evidence that sorbic acid does not inhibit yeast as a classic ‘weak acid preservative’
Stratford, M., & Anslow, P. A. (1998) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1472-765x.1998.00424.x · Cited by 209
Self-citationCarmelo, V., Santos, H., & Sá‐Correia, I. (1997) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(96)00245-3 · Cited by 176
Food and Beverage Spoilage Yeasts
Stratford, M. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-28398-0_11 · Cited by 153
Self-citationCid, A., Perona, R., & Serrano, R. (1987) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00434664 · Cited by 129
BAUER, B. E., Rossington, D., Mollapour, M., Mamnun, Y. M., Kuchler, K., & Piper, P. W. (2003) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03701.x · Cited by 122
Conway, E. J., & Downey, M. (1950) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj0470355 · Cited by 120
Alexandre, H., Mathieu, B., & Charpentier, C. (1996) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/13500872-142-3-469 · Cited by 116
Stratford, M., Plumridge, A., Nebe‐von‐Caron, G., & Archer, D. B. (2009) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.09.025 · Cited by 113
Self-citationViegas, C. A., Almeida, P. F. F., Cavaco, M., & Sá‐Correia, I. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.2.779-783.1998 · Cited by 112
Abbott, D. A., Knijnenburg, T., de Poorter, L. M. I., Reinders, M. J. T., Pronk, J. T., & van Maris, A. J. A. (2007) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00242.x · Cited by 100
Sorbic acid resistance: the inoculum effect
Steels, H., James, S. A., Roberts, I. N., & Stratford, M. (2000) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/1097-0061(20000930)16:13 · Cited by 94
Self-citationMechanisms of Fatty Acid Toxicity for Yeast
Neal, A. L., Weinstock, J. O., & Lampen, J. O. (1965) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.90.1.126-131.1965 · Cited by 91
Cole, M., & Keenan, M. H. J. (1987) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.320030105 · Cited by 85
Kobayashi, H., Yamamoto, M., & Aono, R. (1998) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-144-2-353 · Cited by 84
Transport of Sulphur Dioxide by Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Stratford, M., & ROSE, A. H. (1986) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-132-1-1 · Cited by 83
Self-citationHatzixanthis, K., Mollapour, M., Seymour, I. J., BAUER, B. E., Krapf, G., Schüller, C., Kuchler, K., & Piper, P. W. (2003) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.981 · Cited by 78
Metabolic Modulation of Transport Coupling Ratio in Yeast Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase
Venema, K., & Palmgren, M. B. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.33.19659 · Cited by 77
Resistance of Yeasts to Weak Organic Acid Food Preservatives
Piper, P. W. (2011) · Advances in applied microbiology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-387044-5.00004-2 · Cited by 73
Cartwright, C. P., Verzey, F. J., & Rose, A. H. (1987) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-133-4-857 · Cited by 69
Tarsio, M., Zheng, H., Smardon, A. M., Martínez‐Muñoz, G. A., & Kane, P. M. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.251363 · Cited by 65
Reactions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailii to Sulphite
Pilkington, B. J., & Rose, A. H. (1988) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-134-10-2823 · Cited by 60
Involvement of lipids in solute transport in yeasts
Prasad, R., & Rose, A. H. (1986) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.320020402 · Cited by 45
Pearce, A. K., Booth, I. R., & Brown, A. J. P. (2001) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-147-2-403 · Cited by 45
Fernandes, A. R., & Sá‐Correia, I. (2003) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.957 · Cited by 44
Mechanism of Benzoic Acid Uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Macris, B. J. (1975) · Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1128/am.30.4.503-506.1975 · Cited by 43
Application of a master equation for quantitative mRNA analysis using qRT-PCR
Liu, Z. L., Palmquist, D. E., Ma, M., Liu, J., & Alexander, N. J. (2009) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.006 · Cited by 39
Effect of nonylphenol on growth of Neurospora crassa and Candida albicans
Karley, A. J., Powell, S. I., & Davies, J. M. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.4.1312-1317.1997 · Cited by 34
Monteiro, G. A., & Sá‐Correia, I. (1998) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(97)00281-2 · Cited by 31
Antibiotics and antimicrobial action
Hammond, S. M. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 29
Keenan, M. H. J., & Rose, A. H. (1979) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1979.tb04294.x · Cited by 25
Fernandes, A. R., Peixoto, F., & Sá‐Correia, I. (1998) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s002030050671 · Cited by 25
Auxotrophy for uridine increases the sensitivity of Aspergillus niger to weak-acid preservatives
Melin, P., Stratford, M., Plumridge, A., & Archer, D. B. (2008) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/014332-0 · Cited by 21
Self-citationAntibiotics and Antimicrobial Action
Chattaway, F. W. (1978) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(78)90067-5 · Cited by 20
Lapathitis, G., & Kotyk, A. (1998) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1080/15216549800204522 · Cited by 13
Arami, S.-I., Hada, M., & Tada, M. (1997) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-143-7-2465 · Cited by 13
Legiša, M., & Grdadolnik, S. G. (2002) · University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) · Cited by 10
Sergeeva, Y. E., Галанина, Л. А., Kochkina, G. A., & Феофилова, Е. П. (2009) · Microbiology · doi:10.1134/s0026261709050166 · Cited by 9
Die Wirkung von Sorbins�ure auf Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Reinhard, L., & Radler, F. (1981) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/bf01028099 · Cited by 8
Sulphite metabolism and toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomycodes ludwigii
Stratford, M. (1983) · Cited by 7
Self-citationLachowicz, T. M., Krasowska, A., Łuczyński, J., & Witek, S. (1998) · Folia Microbiologica · doi:10.1007/bf02816514 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Anon, 1995, EC Directive 95/2/EC; food additives other than colours and sweeteners, EC Official Journal, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antifungal Microbial Agents for Food Biopreservation—A Review
Leyva Salas, M., Mounier, J., Valence, F., Coton, M., Thierry, A., & Coton, E. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5030037 · Cited by 349
Diversity and Control of Spoilage Fungi in Dairy Products: An Update
Garnier, L., Valence, F., & Mounier, J. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5030042 · Cited by 301
Axel, C., Zannini, E., & Arendt, E. K. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2016.1147417 · Cited by 215
Piper, J. D., & Piper, P. W. (2017) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12284 · Cited by 220
Inhibitory Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Foodborne Pathogens: A Review
Gao, Z., Daliri, E. B., Wang, J., Liu, D., Chen, S., Ye, X., & Ding, T. (2019) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-303 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Stratford, M., Nebe-von-Caron, G., Steels, H., Novodvorska, M., Ueckert, J., & Archer, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Mologic (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Archer, David B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 164-171
- ISSN
- 0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024151434
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G016046/1, FQ128, BB/K001744/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Keywords
- sorbic acid, acetic acid, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, intracellular acidification, intracellular pH, plasma membrane H+-ATPase, proton pump inhibition, food preservatives, mechanism of action
- MeSH terms
- Food Preservation, Food Preservatives, Proton-Translocating ATPases, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Protons, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sorbic Acid, Acetic Acid, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review