Cited by 225Probiotics and Fermented FoodsEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Antifungal activity of lactobacilli and its relationship with 3-phenyllactic acid production

Cortés-Zavaleta, O., López-Malo, A., Hernández-Mendoza, A., García, H.S.·2014·International Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

In this study, 13 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains (including 5 Lactobacillus casei, 2 Lactobacillus rhamnosus, 2 Lactobacillus fermentum, 1 Lactobacillus acidophilus, 1 Lactobacillus plantarum, 1 Lactobacillus sakei, and 1 Lactobacillus reuteri species) were assessed for both their antifungal activity against four food spoilage molds (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium expansum, and Aspergillus flavus) and their capability to produce the novel antimicrobial compound 3-phenyllactic acid (PLA). Results demonstrated that all molds were sensitive to varying degrees to the cell-free supernatants (CFS) from LAB fermentations (p<0.05), with growth inhibitions ranging from 2.65% to 66.82%. The inhibition ability of CFS was not affected by a heating treatment (121°C, 20 min); however, it declined markedly when the pH of CFS was adjusted to 6.5. With the exception of L. plantarum NRRL B-4496 and L. acidophilus ATCC-4495, all other LAB strains produced PLA ranging from 0.021 to 0.275 mM. The high minimum inhibitory concentration for commercial PLA (3.01-36.10mM) suggests that it cannot be considered the only compound related with the antifungal potential of studied LAB and that synergistic effects may exist among other metabolism products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cortés-Zavaleta, O., López-Malo, A., Hernández-Mendoza, A., & García, H. S.
Affiliations
Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz (MX)
Venue
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
173
Pages
30-35
ISSN
0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086490775
Cited by
225
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
FWCI
20.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
antifungal activity, lactic acid bacteria, 3-phenyllactic acid, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus flavus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus sakei, Lactobacillus reuteri, cell-free supernatant, minimum inhibitory concentration, pH sensitivity, antimicrobial synergy
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Fermentation, Fungi, Lactates, Lactobacillus, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Penicillium, Culture Media, Conditioned

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review