Antifungal activity of lactobacilli and its relationship with 3-phenyllactic acid production
Abstract
In this study, 13 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains (including 5 Lactobacillus casei, 2 Lactobacillus rhamnosus, 2 Lactobacillus fermentum, 1 Lactobacillus acidophilus, 1 Lactobacillus plantarum, 1 Lactobacillus sakei, and 1 Lactobacillus reuteri species) were assessed for both their antifungal activity against four food spoilage molds (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium expansum, and Aspergillus flavus) and their capability to produce the novel antimicrobial compound 3-phenyllactic acid (PLA). Results demonstrated that all molds were sensitive to varying degrees to the cell-free supernatants (CFS) from LAB fermentations (p<0.05), with growth inhibitions ranging from 2.65% to 66.82%. The inhibition ability of CFS was not affected by a heating treatment (121°C, 20 min); however, it declined markedly when the pH of CFS was adjusted to 6.5. With the exception of L. plantarum NRRL B-4496 and L. acidophilus ATCC-4495, all other LAB strains produced PLA ranging from 0.021 to 0.275 mM. The high minimum inhibitory concentration for commercial PLA (3.01-36.10mM) suggests that it cannot be considered the only compound related with the antifungal potential of studied LAB and that synergistic effects may exist among other metabolism products.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cortés-Zavaleta et al. (2014) found the MIC of PLA for C. gloeosporioides to be 0.5 mg/mL.
“Similarly, Guimarães and Venancio (2018) reported complete inhibition of Penicillium nordicum at 8 mg/mL of PLA, while Cortés-Zavaleta et al. (2014) determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of PLA against C. gloeosporioides to be 0.5 mg/mL.”
From Antifungal Potential of Chitosan and Phenyllactic Acid against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, the Anthracnose Pathogen in Avocados (2025) · cites this paper as Cortés-Zavaleta et al. 2014
Cites
Lactobacillus amylovorus DSM 19280 as a novel food-grade antifungal agent for bakery products
Ryan, L. A. M., Zannini, E., Dal Bello, F., Pawlowska, A., Koehler, P., & Arendt, E. K. (2011) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.036 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Metabolite profiles of lactic acid bacteria in grass silage
Broberg, A., Jacobsson, K., Ström, K., & Schnürer, J. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02939-06 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microorganisms with Claimed Probiotic Properties: An Overview of Recent Literature
Fijan, S. (2014) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph110504745 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Antifungal Microbial Agents for Food Biopreservation—A Review
Leyva Salas, M., Mounier, J., Valence, F., Coton, M., Thierry, A., & Coton, E. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5030037 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Lactic acid bacteria as antifungal and anti-mycotoxigenic agents: A comprehensive review
Sadiq, F. A., Yan, B., Tian, F., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2019) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12481 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Russo, P., Arena, M. P., Fiocco, D., Capozzi, V., Drider, D., & Spano, G. (2017) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.04.027 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Update of probiotics in human world: A nonstop source of benefactions till the end of time
Zommiti, M., Feuilloley, M. G. J., & Connil, N. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8121907 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Anti-aflatoxigenic effect of organic acids produced by Lactobacillus plantarum
Guimarães, A., Santiago, A., Teixeira, J. A., Venâncio, A., & Abrunhosa, L. (2018) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.10.025 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Fernandez, B., Vimont, A., Desfossés-Foucault, É., Daga, M., Arora, G., & Fliss, I. (2017) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.007 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Hamidou, H. A. (2025) · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology · doi:10.17957/ijab/15.2384 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cortés-Zavaleta, O., López-Malo, A., Hernández-Mendoza, A., & García, H. S.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz (MX)
- ORCID
- Cortés-Zavaleta, O.
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 173
- Pages
- 30-35
- ISSN
- 0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086490775
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 20.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Keywords
- antifungal activity, lactic acid bacteria, 3-phenyllactic acid, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium expansum, Aspergillus flavus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus sakei, Lactobacillus reuteri, cell-free supernatant, minimum inhibitory concentration, pH sensitivity, antimicrobial synergy
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Fermentation, Fungi, Lactates, Lactobacillus, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Penicillium, Culture Media, Conditioned
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review