Adsorption of aflatoxin B1, zearalenone and ochratoxin A by microorganisms isolated from Kefir grains
Open accessAbstract
A strategy to reduce the deleterious effects of mycotoxins is to use dietary supplements that contain microorganisms that bind mycotoxins and decrease their gastrointestinal absorption. Novel strains were isolated from a Kefir culture and assessed for their mycotoxin adsorption and biotransformation ability. The most active strains were identified using DNA sequencing, and the stability of microorganism/mycotoxin complexes was evaluated using buffer solutions to simulate the pH conditions in the gastrointestinal tract. Our results showed that the microorganism consortium of Kefir grains adsorbed 82 to 100% of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), zearalenone (ZEA) and ochratoxin A (OTA) when cultivated in milk. The main strains that were capable of mycotoxin adsorption were identified as Lactobacillus kefiri, Kazachstania servazzii and Acetobacter syzygii. The strain L. kefiri KFLM3 was the most active, adsorbing 80 to 100% of the studied mycotoxins when cultivated in milk. Nonetheless, the strain K. servazzii KFGY7 retained more mycotoxin after the desorption experiments (65, 69 and 67% for AFB1, OTA and ZEA, respectively). These findings suggest that Kefir consumption may help to reduce gastrointestinal absorption of these mycotoxins and consequently reduce their toxic effects. The isolated strains may be of interest for the development of fermented dairy products for human consumption that have a new probiotic characteristic, the adsorption of mycotoxins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Niderkorn, V., Morgavi, D. P., Pujos, E., Tissandier, A., & Boudra, H. (2007) · Food Additives and Contaminants · doi:10.1080/02652030601101110 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), 2016. Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs. vol. 1-116 Available from:. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/ Classification/latest_classif.php.
- Mohammadi, H., 2011. A review of aflatoxin M1, milk, and milk products. In: Guevara- Gonzalez, R.G. (Ed.), Aflatoxins -Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. INTECH, pp. 397-414.
- Paterson, R.R., Lima, N., 2010. Toxicology of mycotoxins. In: Luch, A. (Ed.), Molecular, Clin- ical and Environmental Toxicology. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 31-63.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lactic acid bacteria as antifungal and anti-mycotoxigenic agents: A comprehensive review
Sadiq, F. A., Yan, B., Tian, F., Zhao, J., Zhang, H., & Chen, W. (2019) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12481 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Probiotic microorganisms detoxify ochratoxin A in both a chicken liver cell line and chickens
Markowiak, P., Śliżewska, K., Nowak, A., Chlebicz, A., Żbikowski, A., Pawłowski, K., & Szeleszczuk, P. (2019) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9664 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Simões, L., Fernandes, N., de Souza, A., dos Santos, L., Magnani, M., Abrunhosa, L., Teixeira, J., Schwan, R. F., & Dias, D. R. (2022) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation8060277 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Taheur, F. B., Fedhila, K., Chaieb, K., Kouidhi, B., Bakhrouf, A., & Abrunhosa, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Monastir (TN)
- Taibah University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Chaieb, Kamel
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 251
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2599636361
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684)
- European Regional Development Fund (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004, FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027462)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
- Keywords
- mycotoxin adsorption, aflatoxin B1, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, kefir grains, Lactobacillus kefiri, Kazachstania servazzii, probiotics, dietary supplements, gastrointestinal absorption, mycotoxin biotransformation, fermented dairy products, desorption
- MeSH terms
- Kefir, Acetobacter, Adsorption, Saccharomycetales, Foodborne Diseases, Humans, Lactobacillus, Ochratoxins, Zearalenone, Aflatoxin B1, Probiotics, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review