Cited by 288Sports Analytics and PerformanceForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsSports Performance and Training

Using ELO ratings for match result prediction in association football

Hvattum, Lars Magnus, Arntzen, Halvard·2010·International Journal of Forecasting

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.10.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hvattum, L. M., & Arntzen, H.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Molde University College (NO)
Corresponding author
Hvattum, Lars Magnus
Venue
International Journal of Forecasting
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
460-470
ISSN
0169-2070 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063948020
Cited by
288
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Forecasting (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Elo rating, match outcome prediction, soccer, sports betting markets, team rating, forecasting model comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review