The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods
Open accessAbstract
The M4 Competition follows on from the three previous M competitions, the purpose of which was to learn from empirical evidence both how to improve the forecasting accuracy and how such learning could be used to advance the theory and practice of forecasting. The aim of M4 was to replicate and extend the three previous competitions by: (a) significantly increasing the number of series, (b) expanding the number of forecasting methods, and (c) including prediction intervals in the evaluation process as well as point forecasts. This paper covers all aspects of M4 in detail, including its organization and running, the presentation of its results, the top-performing methods overall and by categories, its major findings and their implications, and the computational requirements of the various methods. Finally, it summarizes its main conclusions and states the expectation that its series will become a testing ground for the evaluation of new methods and the improvement of the practice of forecasting, while also suggesting some ways forward for the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Another look at measures of forecast accuracy
Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 · Cited by 5,757
Bates, J. M., & Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1969.103 · Cited by 3,201
Cited by
Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting
Lim, B., Arık, S. Ö., Loeff, N., & Pfister, T. (2021) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012 · Cited by 3,291
Ashofteh, A., Bravo, J. M., & Ayuso, M. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109422 · Cited by 21
Why we need biased AI: How including cognitive biases can enhance AI systems
Hagendorff, T., & Fabi, S. (2024) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2023.2178517 · Cited by 20
Kalfarisi, R., Chew, A., Cai, J., Xue, M., Pok, J., & Wu, Z. Y. (2022) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103287 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Forecasting
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-74
- ISSN
- 0169-2070 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963507686
- Cited by
- 969
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 64.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.04.014
- The paper
- Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.04.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.