Cited by 32Culinary Culture and TourismSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsProteins in Food Systems

Cotton candy: A gastrophysical investigation

Spence, Charles, Corujo, Arume, Youssef, Jozef·2019·International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2019.100146

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spence, C., Corujo, A., & Youssef, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Basque Culinary Center (ES)
Corresponding author
Spence, Charles
Venue
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
16
Pages
100146
ISSN
1878-450X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921040187
Cited by
31
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Culinary Culture and Tourism
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
cotton candy, texture perception, taste perception, English-Spanish comparison, childhood food memories, confectionery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review