Techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture at steam methane reforming facilities using commercially available technology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Waste heat integration from nearby facilities may reduce the energy (and cost) penalty of the capture unit.
“Moreover, waste heat integration from nearby facilities may reduce the energy (and cost) penalty of the capture unit [10].”
From Prospective techno-economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture at a refinery and CO2 utilisation in polyol synthesis (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
This amount is small compared to the CO2 emissions from industrial hydrogen units (220 Mt/a of CO2).
“However, this amount is small compared to the CO 2 emissions from industrial hydrogen units (220 Mt/a of CO 2 , [10].”
From Prospective techno-economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture at a refinery and CO2 utilisation in polyol synthesis (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Climate change 2007: the physical science basis
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Marquis, M. C., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., Miller, H. L., & Chen, Z. (2007) · Cited by 23,398 · see citing works
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.
Schiavon, S., & Zecchin, R. (2007) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 16,994 · see citing works
IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage
Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., de Coninck, H., Loos, M., & Meyer, L. (2021) · Cited by 4,875 · see citing works
Energy Technology Perspectives 2020
International Energy Agency (2020) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/ab43a9a5-en · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Bishnoi, S., & Rochelle, G. T. (2000) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/s0009-2509(00)00182-2 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes
Kuramochi, T., Ramírez, A., Turkenburg, W. C., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.05.001 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Self-citationDamen, K., van Troost, M., Faaij, A. P. C., et al. (2006) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.11.005 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Self-citationKoornneef, J. M., van Keulen, T., Faaij, A. P. C., & Turkenburg, W. C. (2008) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.008 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Self-citationCO2 Capture in the Cement Industry
Barker, D. J., Turner, S. A., Napier-Moore, P., Clark, M., & Davison, J. (2009) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.014 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option
International Energy Agency (2008) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9789264041417-en · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation
Finkenrath, M. (2011) · IEA energy papers · doi:10.1787/5kgggn8wk05l-en · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Degradation of aqueous piperazine in carbon dioxide capture
Freeman, S. A., Davis, J., & Rochelle, G. T. (2010) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.009 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
CO2 capture for refineries, a practical approach
van Straelen, J., Geuzebroek, F., Goodchild, N., et al. (2009) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.022 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Hydrogen costs with CO2 capture
SIMBECK, M. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008044704-9/50108-7 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Hydrogen Production Facilities Plant Performance and Cost Comparisons
LONGANBACH, J. R., Rutkowski, M. D., Klett, M. G., et al. (2002) · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Carbon dioxide absorption in piperazine activated N-methyldiethanolamine
Derks, P. W. J. (2006) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 35 · see citing works
A new flowsheeting tool for flue gas treating
van Elk, E. P., Arendsen, A. R. J., & Versteeg, G. F. (2009) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.194 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Schpigel, L., & Meier, W. (1994) · Chemical and Petroleum Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf01147885 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
CO2 capture in industries and distributed systems: possibilities and limitations
Kuramochi, T. (2011) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measurement, Standards, and Data Needs for CO<sub>2</sub> Capture Materials: A Critical Review
Espinal, L., Poster, D. L., Wong-Ng, W., Allen, A. J., & Green, M. L. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402622q · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Fernández-Dacosta, C., van der Spek, M., Hung, C. R., Oregionni, G. D., Skagestad, R., Parihar, P., Gokak, D. T., Strømman, A. H., & Ramirez, A. (2017) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.08.005 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Liu, W., Li, Y., Zhang, S., & Fu, X. (2019) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.009 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meerman, J. C., Hamborg, E. S., van Keulen, T., Ramírez, A., Turkenburg, W. C., & Faaij, A. P. C.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Venue
- International journal of greenhouse gas control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 160-171
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082649694
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Shell Global Solutions International
- Universiteit Utrecht
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, steam methane reforming, water-gas shift reaction, pressure swing adsorption, CO2 avoidance cost, natural gas consumption, piperazine, process configuration optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
