CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 240CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsClimate Change and Geoengineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The state of the art in monitoring and verification - ten years on

Open access
Jenkins, Charles, Chadwick, Andy, Hovorka, Susan D.·2015·International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
DOI 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 203

  1. Ainslie, 2011, Review of scattering and extinction cross-sections, damping factors, and resonance frequencies of a spherical gas bubble, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 3184, 10.1121/1.3628321 · DOI
  2. Ajo-Franklin, 2013, High-resolution characterization of a CO2 plume using crosswell seismic tomography: Cranfield, MS, USA, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 497, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.018 · DOI
  3. Alnes, 2011, Results from Sleipner gravity monitoring: updated density and temperature distribution of the CO2 plume, 10th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 4, 5504
  4. Alnes, 2008, Monitoring gas production and CO(2) injection at the Sleipner field using time-lapse gravimetry, Geophysics, 73, WA155, 10.1190/1.2991119 · DOI
  5. Amonette, 2014, Geochemical monitoring considerations for the FutureGen 2.0 project, Energy Procedia, 63, 4095, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.441 · DOI
  6. Arts, 2004, Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data, Energy, 29, 1383, 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.072 · DOI
  7. Arts, 2012, The feasibility of CO2 storage in the depleted P 18-4 gas field offshore the Netherlands (the ROAD project), Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 11, S10, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.09.010 · DOI
  8. Bachu, 1994, Aquifer disposal of CO2: hydrodynamic and mineral trapping, Energy Convers. Manage., 35, 269, 10.1016/0196-8904(94)90060-4 · DOI
  9. Bateson, 2008, The application of remote-sensing techniques to monitor CO2-storage sites for surface leakage: method development and testing at Latera (Italy) where naturally produced CO2 is leaking to the atmosphere, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 2, 388, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2007.12.005 · DOI
  10. Beaubien, 2013, Monitoring of near-surface gas geochemistry at the Weyburn Canada, CO2-EOR site, 2001–2011, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 16, S236, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.013 · DOI
  11. Bellante, 2013, Aerial detection of a simulated CO2 leak from a geologic sequestration site using hyperspectral imagery, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 13, 124, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.034 · DOI
  12. Bernardo, 2011, Permanent shallow subsoil CO2 flux chambers for monitoring of onshore CO2 geological storage sites, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 565, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.05.011 · DOI
  13. Bissell, 2011, A full field simulation of the In Salah gas production and CO2 storage project using a coupled geo-mechanical and thermal fluid flow simulator, 10th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 4, 3290
  14. Blackford, 2015, Marine baseline and monitoring strategies for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS), Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.10.004 · DOI
  15. Blackford, 2014, Detection and impacts of leakage from sub-seafloor deep geological carbon dioxide storage, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 1011, 10.1038/nclimate2381 · DOI
  16. Boreham, 2011, Monitoring of CO2 storage in a depleted natural gas reservoir: gas geochemistry from the CO2CRC Otway Project, Australia, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 1039, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.011 · DOI
  17. Bourne, 2014, A risk-based framework for measurement, monitoring and verification of the Quest CCS Project, Alberta, Canada, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 26, 109, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.04.026 · DOI
  18. Bowden, 2013, Biosphere risk assessment for CO2 storage projects, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 16, S291, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.015 · DOI
  19. Braunberger, 2014, Characterization and time-lapse monitoring utilizing pulsed-neutron well logging: associated CO2 storage at a commercial CO2 EOR project, Energy Procedia, 63, 3935, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.423 · DOI
  20. Butsch, 2013, Integration of well-based subsurface monitoring technologies: lessons learned at SECARB study, Cranfield, MS, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 409, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.06.010 · DOI
  21. Carpenter, 2011, The CO2QUALSTORE guideline for selection, characterisation and qualification of sites and projects for geological storage of CO2, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 942, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.12.005 · DOI
  22. Carrigan, 2013, Electrical resistance tomographic monitoring of CO2 movement in deep geologic reservoirs, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 401, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.016 · DOI
  23. Carroll, 2014, Key factors for determining groundwater impacts due to leakage from geologic carbon sequestration reservoirs, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 29, 153, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.07.007 · DOI
  24. Carter, 2013, Sensitivity analysis of Tuscaloosa sandstones to CO2 saturation, Cranfield field, Cranfield, MS, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 485, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.006 · DOI
  25. Cavanagh, 2013, Benchmark calibration and prediction of the Sleipner CO2 plume from 2006 to 2012, Energy Procedia, 37, 3529, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.246 · DOI
  26. Chadwick, 2010, Quantitative analysis of time-lapse seismic monitoring data at the Sleipner CO2 storage operation, Lead. Edge, 29, 170, 10.1190/1.3304820 · DOI
  27. Chadwick, 2014, CO2 storage monitoring: leakage detection and measurement in subsurface volumes from 3D seismic data at Sleipner, Energy Procedia, 63, 4224, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.458 · DOI
  28. Chadwick, 2015, Underground CO2 storage: demonstrating regulatory conformance by convergence of history-matched modelled and observed CO2 plume behaviour using the Sleipner time-lapse seismics, Greenh. Gases: Sci. Technol., 5, 1, 10.1002/ghg.1488 · DOI
  29. Chadwick, 2012, Measuring pressure performance of a large saline aquifer during industrial-scale CO2 injection: the Utsira Sand, Norwegian North Sea, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 10, 374, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.022 · DOI
  30. Clochard, 2010, CO2 plume imaging using pre-stack stratigraphic inversion: a case study on the Sleipner field, First Break, 28, 57, 10.3997/1365-2397.28.1.38083 · DOI
  31. Cohen, 2013, The CO2-Vadose project: experimental study and modelling of CO2 induced leakage and tracers associated in the carbonate vadose zone, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 14, 128, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.008 · DOI
  32. Cook, 2013, The process of developing a CO2 test injection; experience to date and best practices, IEAGHG R&D Programme
  33. de Caritat, 2013, Monitoring groundwater flow and chemical and isotopic composition at a demonstration site for carbon dioxide storage in a depleted natural gas reservoir, Appl. Geochem., 30, 16, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.05.005 · DOI
  34. Ditkof, 2013, Time lapse seismic signal analysis for EOR and CCS site, Cranfield field, Mississippi, Geophysics, Interpretation, 1, T157, 10.1190/INT-2013-0056.1 · DOI
  35. Dodds, 2013, Evaluating time-lapse borehole gravity for CO2 plume detection at SECARB Cranfield, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 421, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.024 · DOI
  36. Doetsch, 2013, Constraining CO2 simulations by coupled modeling and inversion of electrical resistance and gas composition data, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 510, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.011 · DOI
  37. Donders, 2013, Tree rings as biosensor to detect leakage of subsurface fossil CO2, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 19, 387, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.09.017 · DOI
  38. Ehlig-Economides, 2010, Sequestering carbon dioxide in a closed underground volume, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 70, 118, 10.1016/j.petrol.2009.11.002 · DOI
  39. Eiken, 2011, Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snøhvit, Energy Procedia, 4, 5541, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.541 · DOI
  40. Ellsworth, 2013, Injection-induced earthquakes, Science, 341, 142, 10.1126/science.1225942 · DOI
  41. Emberley, 2005, Monitoring of fluid–rock interaction and CO2 storage through produced fluid sampling at the Weyburn CO2-injection enhanced oil recovery site, Saskatchewan, Canada, Appl. Geochem., 20, 1131, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.02.007 · DOI
  42. Enting, 2008, A perturbation analysis of the climate benefit from geosequestration of carbon dioxide, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 2, 289, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.005 · DOI
  43. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. 40 CFR 98, Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Injection and Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. Subpart UU – Injection of Carbon Dioxide, pp. 75060–75089.
  44. Etheridge, 2011, Atmospheric monitoring of the CO2CRC Otway Project and lessons for large scale CO2 storage projects, 10th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 4, 3666
  45. Feitz, 2014, An assessment of near surface CO2 leakage detection techniques under Australian conditions, Energy Procedia, 63, 3891, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.419 · DOI
  46. Finley, 2014, An overview of the Illinois Basin? Decatur Project, Greenh. Gases-Sci. Technol., 4, 571, 10.1002/ghg.1433 · DOI
  47. Flett, 2009, Subsurface development of CO2 disposal for the Gorgon Project, Energy Procedia, 1, 3031, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.081 · DOI
  48. Freifeld, 2014, The modular borehole monitoring program: a research program to optimize well-based monitoring for geologic carbon sequestration, Energy Procedia, 63, 3500, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.379 · DOI
  49. Freifeld, 2005, The U-tube: a novel system for acquiring borehole fluid samples from a deep geologic CO2 sequestration experiment, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 110, B10203, 10.1029/2005JB003735 · DOI
  50. Frerichs, 2013, Microbial community changes at a terrestrial volcanic CO2 vent induced by soil acidification and anaerobic microhabitats within the soil column, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 84, 60, 10.1111/1574-6941.12040 · DOI
  51. Furre, 2014, Dual sensor streamer technology used in Sleipner CO2 injection monitoring, Geophys. Prospect., 62, 1075, 10.1111/1365-2478.12120 · DOI
  52. Gan, 2013, Gas injection may have triggered earthquakes in the Cogdell oil field, Texas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110, 18786, 10.1073/pnas.1311316110 · DOI
  53. Gerst, J., 2009. MRCSP Michigan Basin test site, Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships aNNUAL rEVIEW.
  54. Ghosh, 2015, Quantitative interpretation of CO2 plume from Sleipner (North Sea), using post-stack inversion and rock physics modeling, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 32, 147, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.11.002 · DOI
  55. Gilfillan, 2013, The potential of noble gas tracers for CO2 monitoring and early warning tracers for leakage, Greenh. Gases-Sci. Technol., 3, 99, 10.1002/ghg.1342 · DOI
  56. Goel, 2012, An advanced algorithm for deformation estimation in non-urban areas, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 73, 100, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.06.001 · DOI
  57. Govindan, 2011, A geostatistical and probabilistic spectral image processing methodology for monitoring potential CO2 leakages on the surface, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 589, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.014 · DOI
  58. Grude, 2013, Time-lapse pressure–saturation discrimination for CO2 storage at the Snøhvit field, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 19, 369, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.09.014 · DOI
  59. Hansen, 2013, Snøhvit: the history of injecting and storing 1Mt CO2 in the Fluvial Tubåen Fm, Energy Procedia, 37, 3565, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.249 · DOI
  60. Haugan, 2004, Metrics to assess the mitigation of global warming by carbon capture and storage in the ocean and in geological reservoirs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 10.1029/2004GL020295 · DOI
  61. Hortle, 2011, Groundwater monitoring at the Otway project site, Australia 10th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 4, 5495
  62. Hosseini, 2012, Analytical model for CO2 injection into brine aquifers containing residual CH4, Transp. Porous Media, 94, 795, 10.1007/s11242-012-0025-x · DOI
  63. Hosseini, 2013, Static and dynamic reservoir modeling for geological CO2 sequestration at Cranfield, Mississippi, U.S.A, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 449, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.009 · DOI
  64. Hosseini, 2012, Scoping analysis of brine extraction/re-injection for enhanced CO2 storage, Greenh. Gases: Sci. Technol., 2, 172, 10.1002/ghg.1283 · DOI
  65. Hovorka, 2006, Measuring permanence of CO2 storage in saline formations: the Frio experiment, Environ. Geosci., 13, 105, 10.1306/eg.11210505011 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Hovorka, 2013, Midproject assessment of the SECARB early test at Cranfield, Mississippi, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 343, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.009 · DOI
  67. Hovorka, 2013, Monitoring a large volume injection at Cranfield, Mississippi—project design and major conclusions, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 345, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.03.021 · DOI
  68. Hovorka, 2013, Monitoring a large-volume injection at Cranfield, Mississippi—project design and recommendations, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 345, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.03.021 · DOI
  69. Hovorka, 2011, Monitoring a large volume CO2 injection: year two results from SECARB project at Denbury’s Cranfield, Mississippi, USA, Energy Procedia, 4, 3478, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.274 · DOI
  70. Huijts, 2007, Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage, Energy Policy, 35, 2780, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.007 · DOI
  71. Humphries, 2012, Atmospheric tomography: a Bayesian inversion technique for determining the rate and location of fugitive emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 1739, 10.1021/es202807s · DOI
  72. Iranmanesh, 2014, Multivariate statistical evaluation of groundwater compliance data from the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project, Energy Procedia, 63, 3182, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.343 · DOI
  73. Jenkins, 2013, Statistical aspects of monitoring and verification, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 13, 215, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.020 · DOI
  74. Jenkins, 2012, Safe storage and effective monitoring of CO2 in depleted gas fields, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, E35, 10.1073/pnas.1107255108 · DOI
  75. Jones, 2014, Monitoring of near surface gas seepage from a shallow injection experiment at the CO2 field lab Norway, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 28, 300, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.021 · DOI
  76. Jones, 2009, New and established techniques for surface gas monitoring at onshore CO2 storage sites, Energy Procedia, 1, 2127, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.277 · DOI
  77. Jones, 2011, In Salah gas CO2 storage JIP: surface gas and biological monitoring, 10th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 4, 3566
  78. Katz, 1981, Overview on underground storage of natural gas, J. Pet. Technol., 33, 943, 10.2118/9390-PA · DOI
  79. Keating, 2010, The impact of CO2 on shallow groundwater chemistry: observations at a natural analog site and implications for carbon sequestration, Environ. Earth Sci., 60, 521, 10.1007/s12665-009-0192-4 · DOI
  80. Keith, 2009, Monitoring effects of a controlled subsurface carbon dioxide release on vegetation using a hyperspectral imager, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 3, 626, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.03.003 · DOI
  81. Kelley, 2014, Reservoir characterization from pressure monitoring during CO2 injection into a depleted pinnacle reef – MRCSP commercial-scale CCS demonstration project, Energy Procedia, 63, 4937, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.524 · DOI
  82. Kim, 2014, Above-zone pressure monitoring and geomechanical analyses for a field-scale CO2 injection project in Cranfield, MS, Greenh. Gases: Sci. Technol., 4, 81, 10.1002/ghg.1388 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Klusman, 2003, Rate measurements and detection of gas microseepage to the atmosphere from an enhanced oil recovery/sequestration project, Rangely, Colorado, USA, Appl. Geochem., 18, 1825, 10.1016/S0883-2927(03)00108-2 · DOI
  84. Klusman, 2011, Comparison of surface and near-surface geochemical methods for detection of gas microseepage from carbon dioxide sequestration, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 1369, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.07.014 · DOI
  85. Koch, R.J., Pearson, S.G., 2007. Evaluation of Sampling Systems for Multiple Completion Regional Aquifer Wells at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos National Laboratory EP 2007–0486.
  86. Koottungal, 2014, 2014 wordwide EOR survey, Oil Gas J.
  87. Korbol, 1995, Sleipner-vest CO2 disposal – injection Of removed CO2 into the Utsira formation, Energy Convers. Manage., 36, 509, 10.1016/0196-8904(95)00055-I · DOI
  88. Krueger, 2011, Effects of elevated CO2 concentrations on the vegetation and microbial populations at a terrestrial CO2 vent at Laacher See Germany, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 1093, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.002 · DOI
  89. Krueger, 2009, Ecosystem effects of elevated CO2 concentrations on microbial populations at a terrestrial CO2 vent at Laacher See Germany, Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 9, 1933
  90. Kruuskra, 2014, CO2 EOR set for growth as new CO2 supplies emerge, Oil Gas J., 112, 66
  91. LaForce, 2014, Residual CO2 saturation estimate using noble gas tracers in a single-well field test: the CO2CRC Otway project, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 26
  92. Lakkaraju, 2010, Studying the vegetation response to simulated leakage of sequestered CO2 using spectral vegetation indices, Ecol. Inf., 5, 379, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.05.002 · DOI
  93. Leighton, 2012, Quantification of undersea gas leaks from carbon capture and storage facilities, from pipelines and from methane seeps, by their acoustic emissions, Proc. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 468, 485, 10.1098/rspa.2011.0221 · DOI
  94. Leighton, 1998, The detection and dimension of bubble entrainment and comminution, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 1825, 10.1121/1.421374 · DOI
  95. Leuning, 2008, Atmospheric monitoring and verification technologies for CO2 geosequestration, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 2, 401, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.01.002 · DOI
  96. Lewicki, 2009, Eddy covariance mapping and quantification of surface CO2 leakage fluxes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 10.1029/2009GL040775 · DOI
  97. Lewicki, 2012, Eddy covariance network design for mapping and quantification of surface CO2 leakage fluxes, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 7, 137, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.010 · DOI
  98. Lewicki, 2009, Detection of CO(2) leakage by eddy covariance during the ZERT project’s CO(2) release experiments, Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 9, 2301
  99. Lewicki, 2009, Eddy covariance observations of surface leakage during shallow subsurface CO2 releases, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 10.1029/2008JD011297 · DOI
  100. Lewicki, 2005, An improved strategy to detect CO2 leakage for verification of geologic carbon sequestration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 10.1029/2005GL024281 · DOI
  101. Lewicki, 2007, Surface CO(2) leakage during two shallow subsurface CO(2) releases, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 10.1029/2007GL032047 · DOI
  102. Liteanu, 2011, Fracture healing and transport properties of wellbore cement in the presence of supercritical CO2, Chem. Geol., 281, 195, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.12.008 · DOI
  103. Loh, 2009, Testing Lagrangian atmospheric dispersion modelling to monitor CO2 and CH4 leakage from geosequestration, Atmos. Environ., 43, 2602, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.053 · DOI
  104. Lombardi, 2008, Natural analogues and test sites for CO2 geological sequestration: experience at Latera, Italy, First Break, 26, 39, 10.3997/1365-2397.26.1115.27803 · DOI
  105. Lu, 2012, Complex fluid flow revealed by monitoring CO2 injection in a fluvial formation, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 117, B03208, 10.1029/2011JB008939 · DOI
  106. Lu, 2012, CO2–rock–brine interactions in lower Tuscaloosa formation at Cranfield CO2 sequestration site Mississippi, U.S.A, Chem. Geol., 291, 269, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.10.020 · DOI
  107. Lu, 2013, Reservoir characterization and complications for trapping mechanisms at Cranfield CO2 injection site, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 361, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.10.007 · DOI
  108. Luhar, 2014, Locating and quantifying greenhouse gas emissions at a geological CO2 storage site using atmospheric modeling and measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 10959, 10.1002/2014JD021880 · DOI
  109. Male, 2010, Using hyperspectral plant signatures for CO2 leak detection during the 2008 ZERT CO2 sequestration field experiment in Bozeman, Montana, Environ. Earth Sci., 60, 251, 10.1007/s12665-009-0372-2 · DOI
  110. Martens, 2013, CO2 storage at the Ketzin pilot site, Germany: fourth year of injection, monitoring, modelling and verification, Energy Procedia, 37, 6434, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.573 · DOI
  111. Mathieson, 2010, CO2 sequestration monitoring and verification technologies applied at Krechba, Algeria, Leading Edge, 29, 216, 10.1190/1.3304827 · DOI
  112. Meckel, 2013, Assessing sensitivity to well leakage from three years of continuous reservoir pressure monitoring during CO2 injection at Cranfield, MS, USA, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 439, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  113. METI, August 2009. For safe operation of a CCS demonstration project, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) Study Group, In: I.S.a.T.P.a.E.B.M.o.E., Trade and Industry (Ed.), Japan.
  114. Mito, 2011, Post-injection monitoring of stored CO2 at the Nagaoka pilot site: 5 years time-lapse well logging results, 10th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 4, 3284
  115. Moni, 2014, Detection of simulated leaks from geologically stored CO2 with C-13 monitoring, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 26, 61, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.04.010 · DOI
  116. Myers, 2013, Tracers–Past, present and future applications in CO2 geosequestration, Appl. Geochem., 30, 125, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.06.001 · DOI
  117. Myrttinen, 2010, Carbon and oxygen isotope indications for CO2 behaviour after injection: first results from the Ketzin site (Germany), Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 14, 1000, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.02.005 · DOI
  118. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, in: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K. (Eds.), Japan.
  119. NETL, 2009. Best practices for public communication and education for carbon storeage projects, in: Laboratory, N.E.T. (Ed.), First ed.
  120. Newell, 2014, Tracing CO2 leakage into groundwater using carbon and strontium isotopes during a controlled CO2 release field test, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 29, 200, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.015 · DOI
  121. Nickerson, 2013, Using subsurface CO2 concentrations and isotopologues to identify CO2 seepage from CCS/CO2-EOR sites: A signal-to-noise based analysis, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 14, 239, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.018 · DOI
  122. Noble, 2012, Biological monitoring for carbon capture and storage – a review and potential future developments, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 10, 520, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.022 · DOI
  123. Noomen, 2012, Spectral and spatial indicators of botanical changes caused by long-term hydrocarbon seepage, Ecol. Inf., 8, 55, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.01.001 · DOI
  124. Nooner, 2007, Constraints on the in situ density of CO2 within the Utsira formation from time-lapse seafloor gravity measurements, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 1, 198, 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00018-7 · DOI
  125. Onuma, 2009, Detection of surface deformation related with CO(2) injection by DInSAR at In Salah, Algeria, Energy Procedia, 1, 2177, 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.283 · DOI
  126. Paap, 2014, Four years of experience with a permanent seismic monitoring array at the Ketzin CO2 storage pilot site, Energy Procedia, 63, 4043, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.436 · DOI
  127. Panno, 2013, Formation waters from Cambrian-age strata, Illinois Basin, USA: constraints on their origin and evolution, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 122, 184, 10.1016/j.gca.2013.08.021 · DOI
  128. Pawar, 2006, Overview of a CO2 sequestration field test in the West Pearl Queen reservoir, New Mexico, Environ. Geosci., 13, 163, 10.1306/eg.10290505013 · DOI
  129. Pearce, 2014, RISCS. A Guide to potential impacts of leakage from CO2 storage, Br. Geol. Survey
  130. Person, 2010, Assessment of basin-scale hydrologic impacts of CO2 sequestration, Illinois basin, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 4, 840, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.004 · DOI
  131. Porse, 2014, Can we treat CO2 well blowouts like routine plumbing problems? A study of the incidence, Impact, and Perception of Loss of Well Control, Energy Procedia, 63, 7149, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.751 · DOI
  132. Prinet, 2013, Lacq-Rousse CO2 capture and storage demonstration pilot: lessons learnt from two and a half years monitoring, Energy Procedia, 37, 3610, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.254 · DOI
  133. Queisser, 2013, Full waveform inversion in the time lapse mode applied to CO2 storage at Sleipner, Geophys. Prospect., 61, 537, 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01072.x · DOI
  134. Rabben, 2011, AVA inversion of the top Utsira sand reflection at the Sleipner field, Geophysics, 76, C53, 10.1190/1.3567951 · DOI
  135. Raoof, 2012, Pore-scale modeling of reactive transport in wellbore cement under CO2 storage conditions, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 11, S67, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.09.012 · DOI
  136. Riding, J.B., Rochelle, C.A., 2005. The IEA Weyburn CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project. Final report of the European research team. British Geological Survey Research Report RR/05/03, p. 54. · DOI
  137. Rillard, 2014, Geochemical assessment of CO2 perturbation in a shallow aquifer evaluated by a push-pull field experiment, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 21, 23, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.019 · DOI
  138. Ringrose, 2013, The In Salah CO2 storage project: lessons learned and knowledge transfer, Energy Procedia, 37, 6226, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.551 · DOI
  139. Risk, 2013, Bulk and isotopic characterization of biogenic CO2 sources and variability in the Weyburn injection area, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 16, S263, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.024 · DOI
  140. Romanak et al., 2015. Determining the origin and migration pathways of soil gas anomalies; the story of plugged and abandoned well CFU-31. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, (in review).
  141. Romanak, 2013, Assessment of alleged CO2 leakage at the Kerr farm using a simple process-based soil gas technique: implications for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) monitoring, Energy Procedia, 37, 4242, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.326 · DOI
  142. Romanak, 2012, Process-based approach to CO2 leakage detection by vadose zone gas monitoring at geologic CO2 storage sites, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L15405, 10.1029/2012GL052426 · DOI
  143. Romanak, 2012, Sensitivity of groundwater systems to CO2: application of a site-specific analysis of carbonate monitoring parameters at the SACROC CO2-enhanced oil field, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 6, 142, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.10.011 · DOI
  144. Romanak, 2014, Process-based soil gas leakage assessment at the Kerr farm: comparison of results to leakage proxies at ZERT and Mt. Etna, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 30, 42, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.008 · DOI
  145. Rossi, 2012, Sleipner CCS site: velocity and attenuation model from seismic tomography, EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts
  146. Rubino, 2011, Numerical analysis of wave-induced fluid flow effects on seismic data: application to monitoring of CO2 storage at the Sleipner field, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 116, B03306, 10.1029/2010JB007997 · DOI
  147. Rubino, 2011, Numerical analysis of wave-induced fluid flow effects on seismic data: application to monitoring of CO2 storage at the Sleipner field, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 116
  148. Sato, 2011, Monitoring and simulation studies for assessing macro- and meso-scale migration of CO2 sequestered in an onshore aquifer: experiences from the Nagaoka pilot site, Japan Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 125, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.003 · DOI
  149. Schacht, 2014, Soil gas monitoring of the Otway Project demonstration site in SE Victoria, Australia, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 24, 14, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.02.007 · DOI
  150. Schloemer, 2013, A review of continuous soil gas monitoring related to CCS – technical advances and lessons learned, Appl. Geochem., 30, 148, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.08.002 · DOI
  151. Shaffer, 2010, Long-term effectiveness and consequences of carbon dioxide sequestration, Nat. Geosci., 3, 464, 10.1038/ngeo896 · DOI
  152. Sharma, 2011, The CO2CRC Otway Project: leveraging experience and exploiting new opportunities at Australia’s first CCS project site, 10th Int. Conf. Greenh. Gas Control Technol., 4, 5447
  153. Skinner, 2002, Well control and intervention. CO2 blowouts: an emerging problem, World Oil, 224, 38
  154. Smith, 2013, Environmental impacts of CO2 leakage: recent results from the ASGARD facility, UK, Energy Procedia, 37, 791, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.169 · DOI
  155. Spangler, 2010, A shallow subsurface controlled release facility in Bozeman, Montana, USA, for testing near surface CO2 detection techniques and transport models, Environ. Earth Sci., 60, 227, 10.1007/s12665-009-0400-2 · DOI
  156. Stalker, 2009, A review of tracers in monitoring CO2 breakthrough: properties, uses, case studies, and novel tracers, 595
  157. Stone, 2009, The impact of carbon capture and storage on climate, Energy Environ. Sci., 2, 81, 10.1039/B807747A · DOI
  158. Strandli, 2014, CO2 plume tracking and history matching using multilevel pressure monitoring at the Illinois Basin – Decatur Project, Energy Procedia, 63, 4473, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.483 · DOI
  159. Strazisar, 2009, Near-surface monitoring for the ZERT shallow CO2 injection project, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 3, 736, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.07.005 · DOI
  160. Strickland, 2014, Geophysical Monitoring Methods Evaluation for the FutureGen 2.0 Project, Energy Procedia, 63, 4394, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.474 · DOI
  161. Strutt, M.H., Beaubien, S.E., Beaubron, J.C., Brach, M., Cardellini, C., Graniere, R., Jones, D.G., Lombardi, S., Penner, L., Quattrocchi, F., Voltatorni, N., 2003. Soil gas as a monitoring tool of deep geological sequestration of carbon dioxide: preliminary results from the EnCana EOR project in Weyburn, Saskatchewan (Canada). Greenh. Gas Control Technol., Vols I and II, Proceedings, 391–396. · DOI
  162. Sun, 2012, Inversion of pressure anomaly data for detecting leakage at geologic carbon sequestration sites, Adv. Water Resour., 44, 20, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.04.006 · DOI
  163. Sun, 2013, Optimal design of pressure-based, leakage detection monitoring networks for geologic carbon sequestration repositories, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 19, 251, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.09.005 · DOI
  164. Sun, 2013, Assessing leakage detectability at geologic CO2 sequestration sites using the probabilistic collocation method, Adv. Water Resour., 56, 49, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.11.017 · DOI
  165. TAC 5.301, 2011. TITLE 16. ECONOMIC REGULATION. PART 1 RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS. CHAPTER 5 CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2). SUBCHAPTER C CERTIFICATION OF GEOLOGIC STORAGE OF ANTHROPOGENIC CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) INCIDENTAL TO ENHANCED RECOVERY OF OIL, GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES. 5.301 Applicability.
  166. Tamburini, 2010, Retrieving surface deformation by PSInSAR (TM) technology: a powerful tool in reservoir monitoring, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 4, 928, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.009 · DOI
  167. Tao, 2013, Modeling above-zone measurements of pressure and temperature for monitoring CCS sites, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 523, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.011 · DOI
  168. Taylor, P., Stahl, H., Vardy, M.E., Bull, J.M., Akhurst, M., Hauton, C., James, R.H., Lichtschlag, A., Long, D., Aleynik, D., Toberman, M., Naylor, M., Connelly, D., Smith, D., Sayer, M.D.J., Widdicombe, S., Wright, I.C., Blackford, J., 2014. A novel sub-seabed CO2 release experiment informing monitoring and impact assessment for geological carbon storage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.09.007 (in press). · DOI
  169. Teatini, 2011, Geomechanical response to seasonal gas storage in depleted reservoirs: a case study in the Po River basin, Italy, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 116, 10.1029/2010JF001793 · DOI
  170. Trautz, 2013, Effect of dissolved CO2 on a shallow groundwater system: a controlled release field experiment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 298, 10.1021/es301280t · DOI
  171. Turnbull, 2014, Atmospheric measurement of point source fossil CO2 emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5001, 10.5194/acp-14-5001-2014 · DOI
  172. Underschultz, 2011, CO2 storage in a depleted gas field: an overview of the CO2CRC Otway Project and initial results, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 922, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.02.009 · DOI
  173. Upham, 2011, Public perceptions of CCS: emergent themes in pan-European focus groups and implications for communications, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 1359, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  174. Van der Meer, 2001, Prediction of migration of CO2 after injection in a saline aquifer: reservoir history matching of a 4D seismic image with a compositional gas/water model, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 378
  175. Vasco, 2010, Satellite-based measurements of surface deformation reveal fluid flow associated with the geological storage of carbon dioxide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L03303, 10.1029/2009GL041544 · DOI
  176. Verma, 2013, Reservoir fluid monitoring in carbon dioxide sequestration at Cranfield, Energy Procedia, 37, 4344, 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.337 · DOI
  177. Viswanathan, 2008, Development of a hybrid process and system model for the assessment of wellbore leakage at a geologic CO2 sequestration site, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7280, 10.1021/es800417x · DOI
  178. Wells, 2007, The use of tracers to assess leakage from the sequestration of CO2 in a depleted oil reservoir, New Mexico, USA, Appl. Geochem., 22, 996, 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.01.002 · DOI
  179. West, 2011, Potential impact of CO2 storage on subsurface microbial ecosystems and implications for groundwater quality, 10th Int. Conf. Green. Gas Control Technol., 4, 3163
  180. White, 2013, Seismic characterization and time-lapse imaging during seven years of CO2 flood in the Weyburn field Saskatchewan, Canada, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 16, S78, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.02.006 · DOI
  181. White, 2013, Toward quantitative CO2 storage estimates from time-lapse 3D seismic travel times: an example from the IEA GHG Weyburn–Midale CO2 monitoring and storage project, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 16, S95, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.01.047 · DOI
  182. White, 2004, Greenhouse gas sequestration in abandoned oil reservoirs: the International Energy Agency Weyburn pilot project, GSA Today, 14, 4, 10.1130/1052-5173(2004)014<004:GGSIAO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  183. White, 2014, Initial results from seismic monitoring at the aquistore CO2 storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada, Energy Procedia, 63, 4418, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.477 · DOI
  184. White, 2011, Geophysical monitoring of the Weyburn CO2 flood: results during 10 years of injection, Energy Procedia, 4, 3628, 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.293 · DOI
  185. White, 2014, Geomechanical behavior of the reservoir and caprock system at the In Salah CO2 storage project, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111, 8747, 10.1073/pnas.1316465111 · DOI
  186. White, 2015, Using spectral decomposition to determine the distribution of injected CO2 and pressure at the Snøhvit field, Geophys. Prospect., 10.1111/1365-2478.12217 · DOI
  187. Wiese, 2014, Thermodynamics and heat transfer in a CO2 injection well using distributed temperature sensing (DTS) and pressure data, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 21, 232, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.12.009 · DOI
  188. Williams, 2012, Quantitative seismic analysis of a thin layer of CO2 in the Sleipner injection plume, Geophysics, 77, R245, 10.1190/geo2011-0449.1 · DOI
  189. Williams, 2014, Design support of an above Cap-rock early detection monitoring system using simulated leakage scenarios at the FutureGen2.0 Site, Energy Procedia, 63, 4071, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.439 · DOI
  190. Wilson, 2014, Sensitivity of CO2 leak detection using a single atmospheric station, Energy Procedia, 63, 3907, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.420 · DOI
  191. Wolaver, 2013, Greensites and brownsites: implications for CO2 sequestration characterization, risk assessment, and monitoring, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 19, 49, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.020 · DOI
  192. Worth, 2014, Aquistore project measurement, monitoring, and verification: from concept to CO2 injection, Energy Procedia, 63, 3202, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.345 · DOI
  193. Würdemann, 2010, CO2SINK—From site characterisation and risk assessment to monitoring and verification: one year of operational experience with the field laboratory for CO2 storage at Ketzin, Germany, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 4, 938, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.08.010 · DOI
  194. Yang, 2014, Inverse modeling of water–rock–CO2 batch experiments: potential impacts on groundwater resources at carbon sequestration sites, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 2798, 10.1021/es4041368 · DOI
  195. Yang, 2014, Field demonstration of CO2 leakage detection in potable aquifers with a pulselike CO2-release test, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 14031, 10.1021/es5044003 · DOI
  196. Yang, 2014, Geochemical sensitivity to CO2 leakage: detection in potable aquifers at carbon sequestration sites, Greenh. Gases: Sci. Technol., 4, 384, 10.1002/ghg.1406 · DOI
  197. Yang, 2013, Single-well push–pull test for assessing potential impacts of CO2 leakage on groundwater quality in a shallow Gulf Coast aquifer in Cranfield, Mississippi, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 18, 375, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.030 · DOI
  198. Zeidouni, 2012, Analytical model of leakage through fault to overlying formations, Water Resour. Res., 48, 17, 10.1029/2012WR012582 · DOI
  199. Zeidouni, 2012, Leakage characterization through above-zone pressure monitoring: 2-design considerations with application to CO2 storage in saline aquifers, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 98–99, 69, 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.09.005 · DOI
  200. Zhang, 2011, Review of integrity of existing wells in relation to CO2 geological storage: what do we know?, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 5, 826, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.11.006 · DOI

200 of 203 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jenkins, C., Chadwick, A., & Hovorka, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • British Geological Survey (GB)
  • Bureau of Economic Geology (US)
Corresponding author
Jenkins, Charles
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
40
Pages
312-349
ISSN
1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.009
OpenAlex
W1673588499
Cited by
240
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K035878/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (bgs05015)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
carbon capture and storage, CO2 storage monitoring, CO2 containment, CO2 leakage, seismic imaging, InSAR, In Salah, soil gas monitoring, groundwater monitoring, CO2 enhanced oil recovery, regulatory compliance, greenhouse gas policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review