The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost and performance of some carbon capture technology options for producing different quality CO 2 product streams
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among physical solvent processes, SelexolTM has been one of the most studied for acid gas removal from high pressure syngas, where it has shown lower energy consumption with recoveries and purities of captured CO2 around 96-99%.
“Among the main processes based on physical solvents, Selexol™, Rectisol® and Purisol®, the Selexol™ process has been one of the most studied for acid gas removal from high pressure syngas, where it has shown lower energy consumption with recoveries and purities of the captured CO2 around 96-99 % [8-10].”
From Integration of hydrothermal liquefaction and carbon capture and storage for the production of advanced liquid biofuels with negative CO2 emissions (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
The Introduction (p. 6) reports Selexol as more energy-efficient than solvents including Rectisol, and the results table (p. 20) gives CO2 product purities of 97.64% and 97.91% for the Selexol cases. But sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.3 (pp. 16, 18) specify 95% CO2 capture for those cases, not recovery of around 96–99%. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Self-citationThe cost of CO2 capture and storage
Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 · Cited by 1,008
Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage
Rubin, E. S., Chen, C., & Rao, A. B. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.009 · Cited by 725
Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations
de Visser, E., Hendriks, C. A., Barrio, M., Mølnvik, M. J., de Koeijer, G. M., Liljemark, S., & Gallo, Y. L. (2008) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006 · Cited by 531
A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture
Goto, K., Yogo, K., & Higashii, T. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.020 · Cited by 526
Combustion characteristics of coal in a mixture of oxygen and recycled flue gas
Tan, Y., Croiset, E., Douglas, M. A., & Thambimuthu, K. V. (2005) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2005.08.010 · Cited by 394
The range and level of impurities in CO2 streams from different carbon capture sources
Porter, R., Fairweather, M., Pourkashanian, M. M., et al. (2015) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.02.016 · Cited by 329
Self-citationPadurean, A., Cormos, C.-C., & Agachi, P.-S. (2012) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.007 · Cited by 228
Identifying Cost-Effective CO 2 Control Levels for Amine-Based CO 2 Capture Systems
Rao, A. B., & Rubin, E. S. (2005) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie050603p · Cited by 217
Li, H., Yan, J., Yan, J., et al. (2008) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.05.006 · Cited by 203
Power generation with CO2 capture: Technology for CO2 purification
Pipitone, G., & Bolland, O. (2009) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.03.001 · Cited by 199
Rectisol wash process simulation and analysis
Sun, L. J., & Smith, R. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.049 · Cited by 187
Combustion modelling opportunities and challenges for oxy-coal carbon capture technology
Edge, P. J., Gharebaghi, M., Irons, R., Porter, R., Porter, R., Pourkashanian, M. M., Smith, D., Stephenson, P. L., & Williams, A. (2010) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.010 · Cited by 172
Self-citationComparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage
Rubin, E. S., RAO, A., & Chen, C. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008044704-9/50029-x · Cited by 156
Schach, M., Schneider, R., Schramm, H., & Repke, J. (2010) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie900514t · Cited by 142
Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance
Ordorica‐Garcia, G., Douglas, P. L., Croiset, E., et al. (2006) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2005.11.020 · Cited by 140
Sim, S., Cole, I. S., Choi, Y.-S., & Birbilis, N. (2014) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.010 · Cited by 130
Potential Flue Gas Impurities in Carbon Dioxide Streams Separated from Coal-Fired Power Plants
Lee, J., Keener, T. C., & Yang, Y. J. (2009) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.6.725 · Cited by 129
Ekström, C., Schwendig, F., Biede, O., et al. (2009) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.234 · Cited by 127
The role of CO 2 purification and transport networks in carbon capture and storage cost reduction
Kolster, C., Mechleri, E. D., Krevor, S. C. M., & Dowell, N. M. (2017) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.01.014 · Cited by 114
Self-citationOptimization of CO2 compression and purification units (CO2CPU) for CCS power plants
Posch, S., & Haider, M. (2011) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.039 · Cited by 113
2008 Gasification Technologies Conference
Harada, M. (2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 101
Assessment of the different parameters affecting the CO2 purity from coal fired oxyfuel process
Kather, A., & Kownatzki, S. (2011) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.025 · Cited by 67
Al-Qayim, K., Nimmo, W., & Pourkashanian, M. M. (2015) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.013 · Cited by 66
Mohammed, I. Y., Samah, M., Sabina, G., & Mohamed, A. (2014) · International Journal of Engineering Research · doi:10.17950/ijer/v3s12/1207 · Cited by 51
Optimized enriched CO2 recycle oxy-fuel combustion for high ash coals
Seepana, S., & Jayanti, S. (2009) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.04.029 · Cited by 40
Catalanotti, E., Hughes, K. J., Porter, R., Price, J., & Pourkashanian, M. M. (2013) · Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1002/ep.11894 · Cited by 28
Self-citationBassi, S., Boyd, R., Buckle, S. J., Fennell, P. S., Dowell, N. M., Makuch, Z., & Staffell, I. (2015) · Cited by 21
Cost and Performance of PC and IGCC Plants for a Range of Carbon Dioxide Capture - Rev. 1
Gerdes, K., USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Black, J., Haslback, J., Jones, A., Lundberg, W., Shah, V., Kyle, A., & Lewis, E. G. (2013) · doi:10.2172/1513270 · Cited by 14
Cost and Performance of PC and IGCC Plants for a Range of Carbon Dioxide Capture - Original
Gerdes, K., USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Black, J., Haslbeck, J., Jones, A., Lundberg, W., Shah, V., Kyle, A., & Lewis, E. G. (2011) · doi:10.2172/1515274 · Cited by 14
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dillon, 2005, Oxy-combustion processes for CO2 capture from power plant, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lozano, E. M., Pedersen, T. H., & Rosendahl, L. A. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115753 · Cited by 70
“3 CO2 around 96-99 % [8–10].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, R. T. J., Fairweather, M., Kolster, C., Mac Dowell, N., Shah, N., & Woolley, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Porter, Richard T.J.
- Venue
- International journal of greenhouse gas control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 185-195
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2559842154
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- European Union 7th Framework Programme (309102)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, oxy-fuel combustion, pre-combustion capture, post-combustion CO2 capture, integrated gasification combined cycle, flue gas treatment, distillation purification, power plant costs, pollution control devices, carbon capture and storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
