Cited by 53Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus according to IADPSG and NICE criteria

Djelmis, Josip, Pavić, Mato, Mulliqi Kotori, Vjosa, Pavlić Renar, Ivana, Ivanisevic, Marina, Oreskovic, Slavko·2016·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of the International Association of Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and overt diabetes as compared with the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria, and to evaluate the prevalence of maternal and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of 5.1–5.5 mmol/L. Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken of data for women who underwent a 2‐hour 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test at 24–32 weeks of a singleton pregnancy at a center in Croatia between January 2012 and December 2014. Results: Among 4646 included women, 1074 (23.1%) had GDM according to IADPSG criteria, 826 (17.8%) would be diagnosed according to NICE criteria, and 50 (1.1%) had overt diabetes. FPG levels were 5.1–5.5 mmol/L for 409 (8.8%) women. Compared with a control group (n = 3391), these women had higher odds of large‐for‐gestational‐age newborns (odds ratio 3.7, 95% CI 2.0–4.6) and cesarean delivery (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.3–2.3). Conclusion: Women with FPG levels of 5.1–5.5 mmol/L have an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcome, although they would not be diagnosed with GDM according to NICE criteria.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.07.005

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Croatia, Djelmis et al. studied 4646 pregnant women; GDM was diagnosed in 23.1% using IADPSG guidelines and in 17.8% using NICE criteria.

    “In this study 4646 pregnant women took part. In 23.1% of cases, GDM was diagnosed using an OGTT test performed between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation according to the IADPSG guidelines. The NICE criteria met 17.8% of patients [188].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djelmis, J., Pavić, M., Mulliqi Kotori, V., Pavlić Renar, I., Ivanisevic, M., & Oreskovic, S.
Affiliations
University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR)
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-27
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
250-254
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2517395227
Cited by
53
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science, Education and Technology of Croatia (108-1080401-0385)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, IADPSG criteria, fasting blood glucose, overt diabetes in pregnancy, cesarean section, perinatal outcomes, maternal outcomes, diagnostic criteria comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Societies, Medical, State Medicine, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Diabetes, Gestational, Croatia, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review