Cited by 592Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEmotion and Mood RecognitionOnline Learning and Analytics

Automatic prediction of frustration

Kapoor, Ashish, Burleson, Winslow, Picard, Rosalind W.·2007·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.02.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapoor, A., Burleson, W., & Picard, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
Corresponding author
Picard, Rosalind W.
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
65
Issue
8
Pages
724-736
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127429655
Cited by
592
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 49
FWCI
37.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
learner frustration, intelligent tutoring systems, affective computing, Gaussian process classification, Bayesian inference, student engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review