Cited by 159Technology Use by Older AdultsICT in Developing CommunitiesDigital literacy in education

Teaching digital literacy skills to the elderly using a social network with linear navigation: A case study in a rural area

Open access
Castilla, Diana, Botella, Cristina, Miralles, Ignacio, Bretón-López, Juana, Dragomir-Davis, Andrea Maria, Zaragoza, Irene, Garcia-Palacios, Azucena·2018·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Abstract

Abstract Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have considerably increased the information and communication channels, favoring the emergence of new models for social relations, such as social networks. However, for elderly users whose learning has traditionally been based on linear models of information such as textbooks, unfamiliarity with Internet can be a barrier. Moreover, elderly people living in rural communities face a lack of telecommunication infrastructures, which increases their difficulties in accessing ICTs. The aim of this study is to test a social network consisting of multiple applications with linear navigation as a digital literacy method for the elderly in rural areas. A sample of 46 participants between 60–76 years old with heterogeneous previous experience with ICTs participated in the study. They performed eight standardized sessions in an Elderly Leisure Center. Results showed differences in perceived usefulness between users with high and low ICT experience. After eight training sessions, the majority of the participants were able to independently use all the system applications, and positive results were obtained on the variables measured, i.e., learnability, sense of control over the system, ability to use the system, orientation, efficiency, accessible design, perceived ease, perceived usefulness, and intention to use. The participants with previous experience with other ICT methods preferred the linear navigation method because they thought it was easier than other ICTs. The results showed interaction differences when touch screens were used. Qualitative results showed that one of the most frequent emotions at the beginning of the ICT sessions was “fear” (related to breaking the computer or to making fools of themselves), but the continued use of the system improved the users’ perceptions of their own capacity to handle ICTs and their interest in ICTs in general. The main contribution of this work consists of exploring the usefulness of linear navigation and social network systems in the context of digital literacy for elderly users in rural areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.05.009

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elderly users show better performance on systems with linear navigation.

    “elderly users show better performance on systems with linear navigation [32,46,47].”
  • The results showed differences between the present study and previous research with the same web design but a different population (people without cognitive impairment).

    “The results showed differences between the present study and the findings obtained from previous research with the same web design but a different population (i.e., people without cognitive impairment) [32,46].”
  • All items in the post-test questionnaire were obtained from a previous usability study with elderly users.

    “All the items were obtained from a previous usability study with elderly users (see [32]).”
  • The ehcoBUTLER system was developed following the guidelines of a software that has proven its usability with elderly users using linear navigation.

    “The system has been developed following the guidelines of a software that has proven its usability with elderly users using linear navigation [32,46,59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castilla, D., Botella, C., Miralles, I., Bretón-López, J., Dragomir-Davis, A. M., Zaragoza, I., & Garcia-Palacios, A.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Castilla, Diana
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
118
Pages
24-37
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805664907
Cited by
159
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9
FWCI
21.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PI13/00982)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
digital literacy, older adults, rural elderly, social networks, ICT training, perceived usefulness, perceived ease, intention to use, accessible design, touch screen, technology anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review