The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of challenge-based gamification on learning: An experiment in the context of statistics education
Open accessAbstract
Gamification is increasingly employed in learning environments as a way to increase student motivation and consequent learning outcomes. However, while the research on the effectiveness of gamification in the context of education has been growing, there are blind spots regarding which types of gamification may be suitable for different educational contexts. This study investigates the effects of the challenge-based gamification on learning in the area of statistics education. We developed a gamification approach, called Horses for Courses, which is composed of main game design patterns related to the challenge-based gamification; points, levels, challenges and a leaderboard. Having conducted a 2 (read: yes vs. no) x 2 (gamification: yes vs. no) between-subject experiment, we present a quantitative analysis of the performance of 365 students from two different academic majors: Electrical and Computer Engineering (n=279), and Business Administration (n=86). The results of our experiments show that the challenge-based gamification had a positive impact on student learning compared to traditional teaching methods (compared to having no treatment and treatment involving reading exercises). The effect was larger for females or for students at the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baltosser, W. H., & Zar, J. H. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265725 · Cited by 35,166
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments · doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040 · Cited by 8,402
Multiple comparisons among means
Dunn, O. J. (1961) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 · Cited by 5,006
A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 · Cited by 2,890
Gamification in theory and action: a survey
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006 · Cited by 2,515
Forecasting methods and applications
(1993) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90040-p · Cited by 2,393
Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. J. L. (2011) · Cited by 2,378
Motivations for Play in Online Games
Yee, N. (2006) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772 · Cited by 2,173
Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5 · Cited by 2,112 · cited 7×
“…on the impact of gami fi cation, independently of the application domain or used gami fi ed strategy (Buckley and Doyle, 2017; Caponetto et al., 2014; Dichev and Dicheva, 2017; Dicheva et al., 2015; Hanus and Fox, 2015; Koivisto and Hamari, 2019; Lambruschini and Pizarro, 2015; Landers et al., 2018;…”
Influential
Cited by
Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education
Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M. A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., & Alias, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042247 · Cited by 512
Gamification of e-learning in higher education: a systematic literature review
Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R., & Nader, F. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z · Cited by 409
Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda
Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Shi, L., Toda, A. M., Rodrigues, L., Palomino, P. T., & Isotani, S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4 · Cited by 341
Self-citationKaya, O. S., & Ercag, E. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11585-z · Cited by 121
A Review of Gamification Impact on Student Behavioural and Learning Outcomes
Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., Ahdhianto, E., Samsudin, A., & Isnantyo, F. D. (2021) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v15i21.24381 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Legaki, N.-Z., Xi, N., Hamari, J., Karpouzis, K., & Assimakopoulos, V.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 102496
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3034563008
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 69.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of challenge-based gamification on learning: An experiment in the context of statistics education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102496
- The paper
- Legaki, N.-Z., Xi, N., Hamari, J., Karpouzis, K., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The effect of challenge-based gamification on learning: An experiment in the context of statistics education. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
