Cited by 339Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBiofuel production and bioconversion

An evaluative report and challenges for fermentative biohydrogen production

Sinha, Pallavi, Pandey, Anjana·2011·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.077

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinha, P., & Pandey, A.
Affiliations
University of Allahabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Pandey, Anjana
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
36
Issue
13
Pages
7460-7478
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050749460
Cited by
339
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
54.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
microbial hydrogen production, metabolic engineering, hydrogen yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review