Cited by 44Spacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesProcess Optimization and IntegrationThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems

Hydrogen and LNG production from coke oven gas with multi-stage helium expansion refrigeration

Xu, Jingxuan, Lin, Wensheng, Xu, Shilong·2018·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.137

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, J., Lin, W., & Xu, S.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lin, Wensheng
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
43
Issue
28
Pages
12680-12687
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809088204
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Process Optimization and Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Keywords
coke oven gas, liquid hydrogen production, liquefied natural gas, cryogenic liquefaction, cryogenic distillation, methane recovery, hydrogen recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review