The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Additives in proton exchange membranes for low- and high-temperature fuel cell applications: A review
Abstract
Abstract Polymer electrolyte membranes, also known as proton exchange membranes (PEMs), are a type of semipermeable membrane that exhibits the property of conducting ions while impeding the mixing of reactant materials across the membrane. Due to the large potential and substantial number of applications of these materials, the development of proton exchange membranes (PEMs) has been in progress for the last few decades to successfully replace the commercial Nafion® membranes. In the course of this research, an alternate perspective of PEMs has been initiated with a desire to attain successful operations at higher working temperatures (120–200 °C) while retaining the physical properties, stability and high proton conductivity. Both low- and high-temperature PEMs have been fabricated by various processes, such as grafting, cross-linking, or combining polymer electrolytes with nanoparticles, additives and acid-base complexes by electrostatic interactions, or by employing layer-by-layer technologies. The current review suggests that the incorporation of additives such as plasticisers and fillers has proven potential to modify the physical and chemical properties of pristine and/or composite membranes. In many studies, additives have demonstrated a substantial role in ameliorating both the mechanical and electrical properties of PEMs to make them effective for fuel cell applications. It is notable that plasticiser additives are less desirable for the development of high-temperature PEMs, as their inherent highly hydrophilic properties may stiffen the membrane. Conversely, filler additives form an inorganic-organic composite with increased surface area to retain more bound water within the polymer matrices to overcome the drawbacks of ohmic losses at high operating temperatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antonucci, P. L., Aricò, A. S., Cretı̀, P., Ramunni, E., & Antonucci, V (1999) · Solid State Ionics · doi:10.1016/s0167-2738(99)00206-4 · Cited by 436
Tang, Y., Karlsson, A. M., Santare, M. H., Gilbert, M., Cleghorn, S., & Johnson, W. B. (2006) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.055 · Cited by 316
Hasiotis, C., Qingfeng, L., Deimede, V., Kallitsis, J. K., Kontoyannis, C. G., & Bjerrum, N. J. (2001) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1366621 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Recent advances in membrane technologies for hydrogen purification
Bernardo, G., Araújo, T., da Silva Lopes, T., Sousa, J., & Mendes, A. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.162 · Cited by 391
Pan, M., Pan, C., Li, C., & Zhao, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110771 · Cited by 357
Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly
Mo, S., Du, L., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., Wu, P., Meng, L., Wang, N., Xing, L., Zhao, M., et al. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00190-w · Cited by 277
“On the other hand, the Grotthuss mechanism refers to proton hopping between water molecules by hydrogen bonding [89].”
Yin, Z., Geng, H., Yang, P., Shi, B., Fan, C., Peng, Q., Wu, H., & Jiang, Z. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.119 · Cited by 63
Teixeira, F. C., de Sá, A. I., Teixeira, A. P. S., Ortiz-Martínez, V. M., Ortiz, A., Ortiz, I., & Rangel, C. M. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.212 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, C. Y., Wong, W. Y., Ramya, K., Khalid, M., Loh, K. S., Daud, W. R. W., Lim, K. L., Walvekar, R., & Kadhum, A. A. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6116-6135
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912437159
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.