The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of renewable energy sources in tandem with electrolysis: A technology review for green hydrogen production
Open accessAbstract
The global shift toward sustainable energy solutions emphasises the urgent need to harness renewable sources for green hydrogen production, presenting a critical opportunity in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Despite its potential, integrating renewable energy with electrolysis to produce green hydrogen faces significant technological and economic challenges, particularly in achieving high efficiency and cost-effectiveness at scale. This review systematically examines the latest advancements in electrolysis technologies—alkaline, proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell (PEMEC), and solid oxide—and explores innovative grid integration and energy storage solutions that enhance the viability of green hydrogen. The study reveals enhanced performance metrics in electrolysis processes and identifies critical factors that influence the operational efficiency and sustainability of green hydrogen production. Key findings demonstrate the potential for substantial reductions in the cost and energy requirements of hydrogen production by optimising electrolyser design and operation. The insights from this research provide a foundational strategy for scaling up green hydrogen as a sustainable energy carrier, contributing to global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and advance toward carbon neutrality. The integration of these technologies could revolutionise energy systems worldwide, aligning with policy frameworks and market dynamics to foster broader adoption of green hydrogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buttler, A., & Spliethoff, H. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 · Cited by 2,510
Hydrogen as an energy carrier: Prospects and challenges
Mazloomi, K., & Gomes, C. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.028 · Cited by 1,736
Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions
Olabi, A. G., bahri, A. S., Abdelghafar, A. A., Baroutaji, A., Sayed, E. T., Alami, A. H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.110 · Cited by 492
Vidas, L., & Castro, R. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112311363 · Cited by 269
Progress and Perspectives for Solar‐Driven Water Electrolysis to Produce Green Hydrogen
Zhao, H., & Yuan, Z. (2023) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202300254 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Xue, Q., Wang, C., Chen, T., Zhang, G., Yin, C., Zhang, F., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Xu, L., & Wang, S. (2026) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.71157 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Nnabuife, S. G., Hamzat, A. K., Whidborne, J., Kuang, B., & Jenkins, K. W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 218-240
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4400280645
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 31.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integration of renewable energy sources in tandem with electrolysis: A technology review for green hydrogen production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.342
- The paper
- Nnabuife, S. G., Hamzat, A. K., Whidborne, J., Kuang, B., & Jenkins, K. W. (2025). Integration of renewable energy sources in tandem with electrolysis: A technology review for green hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.