CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Switching costs in the US seed industry: Technology adoption and welfare impacts

Luo, Jinjing, Moschini, GianCarlo, Perry, Edward D.·2023·International Journal of Industrial Organization
DOI 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.102977
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.102977

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Barone, 2011, Switching costs in local credit markets, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 29, 694, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.03.004 · DOI
  2. Berry, 1994, Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation, Rand J. Econ., 25, 242, 10.2307/2555829 · DOI
  3. Berry, 1995, Automobile prices in market equilibrium, Econometrica, 63, 841, 10.2307/2171802 · DOI
  4. Berto Villas-Boas, 2007, Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: inference with limited data, Rev. Econ. Stud., 74, 625, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00433.x · DOI
  5. Bronnenberg, 2009, Brand history, geography, and the persistence of brand shares, J. Political Econ., 117, 87, 10.1086/597301 · DOI
  6. Bronnenberg, 2012, The evolution of brand preferences: evidence from consumer migration, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 2472, 10.1257/aer.102.6.2472 · DOI
  7. Cabral, 2016, Dynamic pricing in customer markets with switching costs, Rev. Econ. Dyn., 20, 43, 10.1016/j.red.2015.09.002 · DOI
  8. Ciliberto, 2019, Valuing product innovation: genetically engineered varieties in US corn and soybeans, Rand J. Econ., 50, 615, 10.1111/1756-2171.12290 · DOI
  9. Clancy, 2017, Intellectual property rights and the ascent of proprietary innovation in agriculture, Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 9, 53, 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053524 · DOI
  10. Conlon, 2020, Best practices for differentiated products demand estimation with pyblp, Rand J. Econ., 51, 1108, 10.1111/1756-2171.12352 · DOI
  11. Daly, 2012, Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models, Transportation (Amsterdam), 39, 19
  12. Dubé, 2010, State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia, Rand J. Econ., 41, 417, 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00106.x · DOI
  13. Dubé, 2009, Do switching costs make markets less competitive?, J. Market. Res., 46, 435, 10.1509/jmkr.46.4.435 · DOI
  14. Farrell, 2007, Coordination and lock-in: competition with switching costs and network effects, 1967, 10.1016/S1573-448X(06)03031-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gaspar, 2020, Defining optimal soybean seeding rates and associated risk across North America, Agron. J., 112, 2103, 10.1002/agj2.20203 · DOI
  16. Goldberg, 1995, Product differentiation and oligopoly in international markets: the case of the US automobile industry, Econometrica, 63, 891, 10.2307/2171803 · DOI
  17. Graff, 2003, Agricultural biotechnology's complementary intellectual assets, Rev. Econ. Stat., 85, 349, 10.1162/003465303765299864 · DOI
  18. Grzybowski, 2021, Estimating consumer inertia in repeated choices of smartphones, J. Ind. Econ., 69, 33, 10.1111/joie.12239 · DOI
  19. Hole, 2007, Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood, Stata J., 7, 388, 10.1177/1536867X0700700306 · DOI
  20. Hole, 2012, Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment, Empir. Econ., 42, 445, 10.1007/s00181-011-0500-1 · DOI
  21. Honka, 2014, Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry, Rand J. Econ., 45, 847, 10.1111/1756-2171.12073 · DOI
  22. Keane, 1997, Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior, J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 15, 310, 10.1080/07350015.1997.10524709 · DOI
  23. Kim, 2018, The dynamics of supply: US corn and soybeans in the biofuel era, Land Econ., 94, 593, 10.3368/le.94.4.593 · DOI
  24. Lee, 2023, Genetically engineered varieties and applied pesticide toxicity in US maize and soybeans: heterogeneous and evolving impacts, Ecol. Econ., 211, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107873 · DOI
  25. Morrow, 2011, Fixed-point approaches to computing Bertrand–Nash equilibrium prices under mixed-logit demand, Oper. Res., 59, 328, 10.1287/opre.1100.0894 · DOI
  26. Moschini, 2008, Biotechnology and the development of food markets: retrospect and prospects, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 35, 331, 10.1093/erae/jbn014 · DOI
  27. Moschini, 2010, Competition issues in the seed industry and the role of intellectual property, Choices, 25, 1
  28. Nevo, 2000, A practitioner's guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand, J. Econ. Manag. Strategy, 9, 513
  29. Nevo, 2001, Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry, Econometrica, 69, 307, 10.1111/1468-0262.00194 · DOI
  30. Pakes, 2003, A reconsideration of hedonic price indexes with an application to PC's, Am. Econ. Rev., 93, 1578, 10.1257/000282803322655455 · DOI
  31. Perry, 2019, Product concentration and usage: Behavioral effects in the glyphosate market, J. Econ. Behav. Org., 158, 543, 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.027 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Perry, 2022, Uncertainty and learning in a technologically dynamic industry: seed density in US maize, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 104, 4, 1388, 10.1111/ajae.12276 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Petrin, 2010, A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models, J. Market. Res., 47, 3, 10.1509/jmkr.47.1.3 · DOI
  34. Polyakova, 2016, Regulation of insurance with adverse selection and switching costs: evidence from Medicare Part D, Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ., 8, 165, 10.1257/app.20150004 · DOI
  35. Shum, 2004, Does advertising overcome brand loyalty? Evidence from the breakfast-cereals market, J. Econ. Manag. Strategy, 13, 241, 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2004.00010.x · DOI
  36. Train, 2007, Vehicle choice behavior and the declining market share of US automakers, Int. Econ. Rev. (Philadelphia), 48, 1469, 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00471.x · DOI
  37. Wechsler, 2018, What do farmers' weed control decisions imply about glyphosate resistance? Evidence from surveys of US corn fields, Pest Manag. Sci., 74, 1143, 10.1002/ps.4598 · DOI
  38. Wooldridge, 2005, Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity, J. Appl. Econ., 20, 39, 10.1002/jae.770 · DOI
  39. Yeo, 2018, Estimating switching costs with market share data: an application to medicare part D, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 61, 459, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.08.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Luo, J., Moschini, G., & Perry, E. D.
Venue
International Journal of Industrial Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
89
Pages
102977
ISSN
0167-7187
DOI
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.102977
Cited by
4
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2018-67023-27682)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review