Cited by 210Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgriculture and Biological Studies

Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops

Open access
Barrows, Geoffrey, Sexton, Steven, Zilberman, David·2014·Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract

For millennia, humans have modified plant genes in order to develop crops best suited for food, fiber, feed, and energy production. Conventional plant breeding remains inherently random and slow, constrained by the availability of desirable traits in closely related plant species. In contrast, agricultural biotechnology employs the modern tools of genetic engineering to reduce uncertainty and breeding time and to transfer traits from more distantly related plants. Critics express concerns that the technology imposes negative environmental effects and jeopardizes the health of those who consume the “frankenfoods.” Supporters emphasize potential gains from boosting output and lowering food prices for consumers. They argue that such gains are achieved contemporaneous with the adoption of farming practices that lower agrochemical use and lessen soil. The extensive experience with agricultural biotechnology since 1996 provides ample evidence with which to test the claims of supporters and opponents and to evaluate the prospects of genetic crop engineering. In this paper, we begin with an overview of the adoption of the first generation of agricultural biotechnology crops. We then look at the evidence on the effects of these crops: on output and prices, on the environment, and on consumer health. Finally, we consider intellectual property issues surrounding this new technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/jep.28.1.99

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barrows et al. found that GM crop adoption has reduced prices between 10% and 20% compared to the counterfactual world without GM crop adoption.

    “Barrows et al. ( 14 ) found that GM crop adoption has reduced prices between 10% and 20% compared to the counterfactual world without GM crop adoption.”

    From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    In “Estimating Effects of Genetically Engineered Seeds on Production and Prices” (page unavailable), the authors estimate that GM adoption lowered corn prices by 13% in 2010 and cotton prices by 18%. But their estimated soybean price decline ranges from 2% to 65%, so the claimed 10%–20% range does not hold for GM crops generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is considerable evidence of gene flow from GM to wild species, for example, in the case of GM to wild canola varieties in Canada.

    “There is considerable evidence of gene flow from GM to wild species, for example, in the case of GM to wild canola varieties in Canada ( 14 )”

    From Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Environmental Benefits and Risks section reports that herbicide-tolerant traits in rapeseed have spread to wild relatives. It does not locate that gene flow in Canada or establish the claim’s broader characterization of “considerable evidence.” Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 210

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. Gouse, Marnus, Carl Pray, David Schimmel- pfennig. 2004. "The Distribution of Benefi ts from Bt Cotton Adoption in South Africa." AgBioForum 7(4): 187-194.
  2. Lynas, Mark. 2013. "Lecture to Oxford Farming Conference, 3 January 2013." Available from http://www.marklynas.org/2013/01/lecture-to -oxford-farming-conference-3-january-2013/.
  3. Qaim, Matin. 2009. "The Economics of Geneti- cally Modifi ed Crops." Annual Review of Resource Economics 1: 665 -94.
  4. Qaim, Matin, and David Zilberman. 2003. "Yield Effects of Genetically Modifi ed Crops in Devel- oping Countries." Science 299(5608): 900 -902.
  5. Sanders, Larry D. 2000. "The Economics of Conservation and Conservation Tillage." Paper presented at the International Symposium on Conservation Tillage, Mazatlan, Mexico, January 24-27. http://agecon.okstate.edu/isct /labranza/sanders/mazecon00.doc.
  6. Shaner, Dale L. 2000. "The Impact of Glyphosate-tolerant Crops on the Use of Other Herbicides and on Resistance Management." Pest Management Science 56(4): 320-26.
  7. Seungki Lee, GianCarlo Moschini, Edward D. Perry. 2023. Genetically engineered varieties and applied pesticide toxicity in U.S. maize and soybeans: Heterogeneous and evolving impacts. Ecological Economics 211, 107873. [Crossref] · DOI
  8. Saurav Das, Manjit Kumar Ray, Dinesh Panday, Piyush Kumar Mishra. 2023. Role of biotechnology in creating sustainable agriculture. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation 2:7, e0000069. [Crossref] · DOI
  9. Jinjing Luo, GianCarlo Moschini, Edward D. Perry. 2023. Switching costs in the US seed industry: Technology adoption and welfare impacts. International Journal of Industrial Organization 89, 102977. [Crossref] · DOI
  10. Casper Worm Hansen, Asger Mose Wingender. 2023. National and Global Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. American Economic Review: Insights 5:2, 224-240. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links] · DOI · Paper page
  11. Alexandre Gohin. 2023. On the sustainability of the French food system: A macroeconomic assessment. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 45:2, 860-880. [Crossref] · DOI
  12. Akello Mirriam, Jayne Mugwe, Jamal Nasar, Oscar Kisaka, Shivani Ranjan, Harun Gitari. 2023. Role of Phosphorus and Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium in Enhancing Soybean Production. Advances in Agriculture 2023, 1-14. [Crossref] · DOI
  13. Eduardo Trigo, Hugo Chavarria, Carl Pray, Stuart J. Smyth, Agustin Torroba, Justus Wesseler, David Zilberman, Juan Martinez. 2023. The Bioeconomy and Food Systems Transformation. Sustainability 15:7, 6101. [Crossref] · DOI
  14. Wei-Bing Zhuang, Yu-Hang Li, Xiao-Chun Shu, Yu-Ting Pu, Xiao-Jing Wang, Tao Wang, Zhong Wang. 2023. The Classification, Molecular Structure and Biological Biosynthesis of Flavonoids, and Their Roles in Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Molecules 28:8, 3599. [Crossref] · DOI
  15. Agata Tyczewska, Tomasz Twardowski, Ewa Woźniak-Gientka. 2023. Agricultural biotechnology for sustainable food security. Trends in Biotechnology 41:3, 331-341. [Crossref] · DOI
  16. Arantza Elena Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Genaro Martín Soto-Zarazúa, Manuel Toledano-Ayala, Juan Fernando García-Trejo. A Potential Alternative for Agar in In Vitro Culture Media Based on Hydrocolloids Present in Nopal: General Structure and Mechanical Properties . [Crossref] · DOI
  17. Sheryl Hendriks, Jean-François Soussana, Martin Cole, Andrew Kambugu, David Zilberman. Ensuring Access to Safe and Nutritious Food for All Through the Transformation of Food Systems 31-58. [Crossref] · DOI
  18. Eduardo Trigo, Hugo Chavarria, Carl Pray, Stuart J. Smyth, Agustin Torroba, Justus Wesseler, David Zilberman, Juan F. Martinez. The Bioeconomy and Food System Transformation 849-868. [Crossref] · DOI
  19. Charuta M. Parkhi, Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool-Tasie, Thomas Reardon. 2023. Do smaller chicken farms use more antibiotics? Evidence of antibiotic diffusion from Nigeria. Agribusiness 39:1, 242-262. [Crossref] · DOI
  20. Joeva Sean Rock, Matthew A. Schnurr, Ann Kingiri, Dominic Glover, Glenn Davis Stone, Adrian Ely, Klara Fischer. 2023. Beyond the Genome: Genetically Modified Crops in Africa and the Implications for Genome Editing. Development and Change 54:1, 117-142. [Crossref] · DOI
  21. Yusuf Chisti. Biotechnology for Sustainable Production of Food 1-29. [Crossref] · DOI
  22. Noureddine Chaachouay, Abdelhamid Azeroual, Bouchaib Bencharki, Lahcen Zidane. Food safety and biotechnological products 353-363. [Crossref] · DOI
  23. John R. Caradus. 2022. Intended and unintended consequences of genetically modified crops -myth, fact and/or manageable outcomes?. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 1-101. [Crossref] · DOI
  24. Cunxi Wang, Gregory J. Bean, Chun Ju Chen, Colton R. Kessenich, Jiexin Peng, Nicolo R. Visconti, Jason S. Milligan, Robert G. Moore, Jianguo Tan, Thomas C. Edrington, Bin Li, Kara S. Giddings, David Bowen, Jinhua Luo, Todd Ciche, William J. Moar. 2022. Safety assessment of Mpp75Aa1.1, a new ETX_MTX2 protein from Brevibacillus laterosporus that controls western corn rootworm. PLOS ONE 17:9, e0274204. [Crossref] · DOI
  25. Renato Nunes de Lima Seixas, José Maria Ferreira Jardim da Silveira, Vinícius Eduardo Ferrari. 2022. Assessing environmental impact of genetically modified seeds in Brazilian agriculture. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10. . [Crossref] · DOI
  26. Na Li, Le Chen, E. Chen, Cansheng Yuan, Hao Zhang, Jian He. 2022. Cloning of a novel tetrahydrofolate-dependent dicamba demethylase gene from dicamba-degrading consortium and characterization of the gene product. Frontiers in Microbiology 13. . [Crossref] · DOI
  27. Haiyan Wang, Peng Lei, Bin Liu, Jianchun Zhu, Qin He, Le Chen, Jian He. 2022. Mutations of Asn321 and Glu322 Improve Resistance of 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Dioxygenase Sp HPPDm to Topramezone. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 70:31, 9703-9710. [Crossref] · DOI
  28. Yan Jin, Simon Schaub, Jale Tosun, Justus Wesseler. 2022. Does China have a public debate on genetically modified organisms? A discourse network analysis of public debate on Weibo. Public Understanding of Science 31:6, 732-750. [Crossref] · DOI
  29. Emma Kovak, Dan Blaustein-Rejto, Matin Qaim. 2022. Genetically modified crops support climate change mitigation. Trends in Plant Science 27:7, 627-629. [Crossref] · DOI
  30. Katherine Lacy, K. Aleks Schaefer, Daniel P. Scheitrum, Eili Y. Klein. 2022. The economic value of genetically engineered mosquitoes as a malaria control strategy depends on local transmission rates. Biotechnology Journal 17:4, 2100373. [Crossref] · DOI
  31. Pooja Sharma, Surendra Pratap Singh, Hafiz M.N. Iqbal, Roberto Parra-Saldivar, Sunita Varjani, Yen Wah Tong. 2022. Genetic modifications associated with sustainability aspects for sustainable developments. Bioengineered 13:4, 9509-9521. [Crossref] · DOI
  32. H. Zakaria, F. K. Obeng, A. K. Quainoo, A. M. Abujaja. 2022. Prospects and constraints faced by smallholder farmers in the cultivation of GM crops: A case study from Northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research 18:3, 221-230. [Crossref] · DOI
  33. Meilin Ma, Jessie Lin, Richard J. Sexton. 2022. The Transition from Small to Large Farms in Developing Economies: A Welfare Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 104:1, 111-133. [Crossref] · DOI
  34. Kjersti Nes, K. Aleks Schaefer, Daniel Scheitrum. 2022. Global Food Trade and the Costs of Non- Adoption of Genetic Engineering. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 104:1, 70-91. [Crossref] · DOI
  35. Manuel Antonio Fernández-Villacañas Marín, Ignacio Fernández-Villacañas Marcos. Agriculture 4.0 for a Sustainable Food System 69-89. [Crossref] · DOI
  36. Chelsea Sutherland, Savannah Gleim, Stuart J. Smyth. 2021. Correlating Genetically Modified Crops, Glyphosate Use and Increased Carbon Sequestration. Sustainability 13:21, 11679. [Crossref] · DOI
  37. Alicia Rihn, Hayk Khachatryan, Xuan Wei. 2021. Perceived subjective versus objective knowledge: Consumer valuation of genetically modified certification on food producing plants. PLOS ONE 16:8, e0255406. [Crossref] · DOI
  38. Akhter U. Ahmed, John Hoddinott, Naveen Abedin, Nusrat Hossain. 2021. The Impacts of GM Foods: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Bt Eggplant in Bangladesh. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 103:4, 1186-1206. [Crossref] · DOI · Paper page
  39. Kristiina Ala-Kokko, Lawton Lanier Nalley, Aaron M. Shew, Jesse B. Tack, Petronella Chaminuka, Marty D. Matlock, Marijke D'Haese. 2021. Economic and ecosystem impacts of GM maize in South Africa. Global Food Security 29, 100544. [Crossref] · DOI
  40. Vincent Smith, Justus H. H. Wesseler, David Zilberman. 2021. New Plant Breeding Technologies: An Assessment of the Political Economy of the Regulatory Environment and Implications for Sustainability. Sustainability 13:7, 3687. [Crossref] · DOI
  41. Alison L. Van Eenennaam, Felipe De Figueiredo Silva, Josephine F. Trott, David Zilberman. 2021. Genetic Engineering of Livestock: The Opportunity Cost of Regulatory Delay. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 9:1, 453-478. [Crossref] · DOI
  42. Linda Ferrari, Chad M. Baum, Alessandro Banterle, Hans De Steur. 2021. Attitude and labelling preferences towards gene-edited food: a consumer study amongst millennials and Generation Z. British Food Journal 123:3, 1268-1286. [Crossref] · DOI
  43. Fieke Dhondt, Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu. Future Sustainable Performance of Hemp 81-93. [Crossref] · DOI
  44. Rakesh Kumar, Narasimha Rao Nizampatnam, Minhaj Alam, Tarun K. Thakur, Anirudh Kumar. Genome Editing Technologies for Plant Improvement: Advances, Applications and Challenges 213-240. [Crossref] · DOI
  45. Fatemeh Badghan, Razieh Namdar, Naser Valizadeh. 2020. Challenges and opportunities of transgenic agricultural products in Iran: convergence of perspectives using Delphi technique. Agriculture & Food Security 9:1. . [Crossref] · DOI
  46. Lynn E. Kwak, Sang Won Yoon, Younjun Kim. 2020. Genetically modified crops' environmental impact and trust in eco-labels. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 28:4, 361-373. [Crossref] · DOI
  47. Koen Deconinck. 2020. Concentration in Seed and Biotech Markets: Extent, Causes, and Impacts. Annual Review of Resource Economics 12:1, 129-147. [Crossref] · DOI · Paper page
  48. Xiaomeng Cui. 2020. Beyond Yield Response: Weather Shocks and Crop Abandonment. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 7:5, 901-932. [Crossref] · DOI
  49. Ricardo Pelai, Shannon M. Hagerman, Robert Kozak. 2020. Biotechnologies in agriculture and forestry: Governance insights from a comparative systematic review of barriers and recommendations. Forest Policy and Economics 117, 102191. [Crossref] · DOI
  50. Ryan Gunderson, Diana Stuart, Brian Petersen. 2020. Materialized ideology and environmental problems: The cases of solar geoengineering and agricultural biotechnology. European Journal of Social Theory 23:3, 389-410. [Crossref] · DOI
  51. Oliver Perkins, James D. A. Millington. 2020. The importance of agricultural yield elasticity for indirect land use change: a Bayesian network analysis for robust uncertainty quantification. Journal of Land Use Science 15:4, 509-531. [Crossref] · DOI
  52. K. Rodríguez-Núñez, F. Rodríguez-Ramos, D. Leiva-Portilla, C. Ibáñez. 2020. Brown biotechnology: a powerful toolbox for resolving current and future challenges in the development of arid lands. SN Applied Sciences 2:7. . [Crossref] · DOI
  53. Matin Qaim. 2020. Role of New Plant Breeding Technologies for Food Security and Sustainable Agricultural Development. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 42:2, 129-150. [Crossref] · DOI
  54. Lawrence J. White. 2020. A "Primarily Property" Presumption Is-Still-Really Needed for the IP/ Antitrust Interface. Review of Industrial Organization 56:4, 715-737. [Crossref] · DOI
  55. Daniel Scheitrum, K. Aleks Schaefer, Kjersti Nes. 2020. Realized and potential global production effects from genetic engineering. Food Policy 93, 101882. [Crossref] · DOI
  56. Xiaomeng Cui. 2020. Climate change and adaptation in agriculture: Evidence from US cropping patterns. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 101, 102306. [Crossref] · DOI
  57. Rebecca Mackelprang, Peggy G. Lemaux. 2020. Genetic Engineering and Editing of Plants: An Analysis of New and Persisting Questions. Annual Review of Plant Biology 71:1, 659-687. [Crossref] · DOI
  58. Ajay Kohli, Berta Miro, Jean Balié, Jacqueline d'A Hughes. 2020. Photosynthesis research: a model to bridge fundamental science, translational products, and socio-economic considerations in agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:7, 2281-2298. [Crossref] · DOI
  59. Bin Liu, Qian Peng, Mengyao Sheng, Haiyan Ni, Xiang Xiao, Qing Tao, Qin He, Jian He. 2020. Isolation and Characterization of a Topramezone-Resistant 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Dioxygenase from Sphingobium sp. TPM-19. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68:4, 1022-1029. [Crossref] · DOI
  60. Paulo Ricardo S. Oliveira, Jose Maria F. J. da Silveira, David S. Bullock. 2020. Innovation in GMOs, technological gap, demand lag, and trade. Agribusiness 36:1, 37-58. [Crossref] · DOI
  61. Saima Aslam, Nadia Gul. Impact of Genetically Modified Crops on Environment 237-248. [Crossref] · DOI
  62. Rohaya Ali, Khurshid Dijoo Zulaykha, Nasreena Sajjad. Genetically Modified Microbes as Biofertilizers 275-293. [Crossref] · DOI
  63. Sadam Munawar, Muhammad Tahir ul Qamar, Ghulam Mustafa, Muhammad Sarwar Khan, Faiz Ahmad Joyia. Role of Biotechnology in Climate Resilient Agriculture 339-365. [Crossref] · DOI
  64. David Wiley, Christy Ng Yen Nee. Food ingredients 377-391. [Crossref] · DOI
  65. Andrés Felipe Hernández-Pérez, Fernanda Valadares, Sarah de Souza Queiroz, Maria das Graças de Almeida Felipe, Anuj Kumar Chandel. Traditional bioeconomy versus modern technology-based bioeconomy 495-509. [Crossref] · DOI
  66. Deepayan Debnath, Madhu Khanna, Deepak Rajagopal, David Zilberman. 2019. The Future of Biofuels in an Electrifying Global Transportation Sector: Imperative, Prospects and Challenges. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 41:4, 563-582. [Crossref] · DOI
  67. Yan Jin, Dusȃn Drabik, Nico Heerink, Justus Wesseler. 2019. The Cost of Postponement of Bt Rice Commercialization in China. Frontiers in Plant Science 10. . [Crossref] · DOI
  68. Gordon Rausser, Steven Sexton, David Zilberman. 2019. The Economics of the Naturalist Food Paradigm. Annual Review of Resource Economics 11:1, 217-236. [Crossref] · DOI
  69. Alejandro Barragán-Ocaña, Gerardo Reyes-Ruiz, Samuel Olmos-Peña, Hortensia Gómez-Viquez. 2019. Transgenic crops: trends and dynamics in the world and in Latin America. Transgenic Research 28:3-4, 391-399. [Crossref] · DOI
  70. Federico Ciliberto, GianCarlo Moschini, Edward D. Perry. 2019. Valuing product innovation: genetically engineered varieties in US corn and soybeans. The RAND Journal of Economics 36. . [Crossref] · DOI
  71. Thomas C. Lee, Thomas C. Edrington, Erin Bell, Luis A. Burzio, Kevin C. Glenn. 2019. Effect of common processing of soybeans on the enzymatic activity and detectability of the protein, Dicamba Mono-Oxygenase (DMO), introduced into dicamba-tolerant MON 87708. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 102, 98-107. [Crossref] · DOI
  72. David Zilberman. 2019. Agricultural Economics as a Poster Child of Applied Economics: Big Data & Big Issues 1. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 101:2, 353-364. [Crossref] · DOI
  73. Thomas A. Swift, Thomas A. A. Oliver, M. Carmen Galan, Heather M. Whitney. 2019. Functional nanomaterials to augment photosynthesis: evidence and considerations for their responsible use in agricultural applications. Interface Focus 9:1, 20180048. [Crossref] · DOI
  74. Le Chen, Shigang Yao, Tao Chen, Qin Tao, Xiangting Xie, Xiang Xiao, Derong Ding, Qin He, Jian He. 2019. Coexpression of Methyltransferase Gene dmt50 and Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Increases Arabidopsis thaliana Dicamba Resistance. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 67:5, 1443-1452. [Crossref] · DOI
  75. Matin Qaim. Genetically Modified Crops 159-164. [Crossref] · DOI
  76. Kai Cui, Sharon P. Shoemaker. 2018. Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: A Nationwide Chinese Consumer Study. npj Science of Food 2:1. . [Crossref] · DOI
  77. Mei-Fang Chen. 2018. Social representations of genetically modified foods and public willingness to consume such foods in Taiwan. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98:14, 5428-5434. [Crossref] · DOI
  78. Guy M. Robinson. 2018. Globalization of Agriculture. Annual Review of Resource Economics 10:1, 133-160. [Crossref] · DOI · Paper page
  79. Admasu Asfaw Maruta, Peter Boxall, Sandeep Mohapatra. 2018. Heterogeneity in attitudes underlying preferences for genomic technology producing hybrid poplars on public land. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 48:8, 869-880. [Crossref] · DOI
  80. David Zilberman, Scott Kaplan, Ben Gordon. 2018. The political economy of labeling. Food Policy 78, 6-13. [Crossref] · DOI
  81. Minyu Zhou, Ian Sheldon, Jihyun Eum. 2018. The role of intellectual property rights in seed technology transfer through trade: evidence from U.S. field crop seed exports. Agricultural Economics 49:4, 423-434. [Crossref] · DOI
  82. David Zilberman, Tim Holland, Itai Trilnick. 2018. Agricultural GMOs-What We Know and Where Scientists Disagree. Sustainability 10:5, 1514. [Crossref] · DOI
  83. David Zilberman, Ben Gordon, Gal Hochman, Justus Wesseler. 2018. Economics of Sustainable Development and the Bioeconomy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 40:1, 22-37. [Crossref] · DOI
  84. Johnny Andrew, Normaz Wana Ismail, Marcel Djama. 2018. An overview of genetically modified crop governance, issues and challenges in Malaysia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98:1, 12-17. [Crossref] · DOI
  85. Leslie Lipper, David Zilberman. A Short History of the Evolution of the Climate Smart Agriculture Approach and Its Links to Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture Debates 13-30. [Crossref] · DOI
  86. N. Dane Scott. Progress in Crisis, Genetic Engineering and Philosophy of Technology 1-17. [Crossref] · DOI
  87. Colin A. Carter, K. Aleks Schaefer. GM Food Standards and Labeling in the USA . [Crossref] · DOI
  88. Wakjira Tesfahun. 2018. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Climate change mitigation and adaptation through biotechnology approaches: A review. Cogent Food & Agriculture 4:1. . [Crossref] · DOI
  89. Rachel E. Ragland, Jennifer L. Mansfield, Dennis A. Savaiano. 2018. A Universal Label for GMOs. Nutrition Today 53:1, 40-46. [Crossref] · DOI
  90. Ana Flávia Canovas Martinez, Luís Gustavo de Almeida, Luiz Alberto Beraldo Moraes, Fernando Luís Cônsoli. 2017. Tapping the biotechnological potential of insect microbial symbionts: new insecticidal porphyrins. BMC Microbiology 17:1. . [Crossref] · DOI
  91. Water Management in Modern Agriculture 29-52. [Crossref] · DOI
  92. Justus Wesseler, Joachim von Braun. 2017. Measuring the Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Annual Review of Resource Economics 9:1, 275-298. [Crossref] · DOI
  93. Benjamin C. Anderson, Ian M. Sheldon. 2017. R&D Concentration Under Endogenous Fixed Costs: Evidence from Genetically Modified Corn Seed. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 99:5, 1265-1286. [Crossref] · DOI
  94. Tina L. Saitone, Richard J. Sexton. 2017. Agri-food supply chain: evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demands. European Review of Agricultural Economics 44:4, 634-657. [Crossref] · DOI
  95. Steven Haggblade, Melinda Smale, Alpha Kergna, Veronique Theriault, Amidou Assima. 2017. Causes and Consequences of Increasing Herbicide Use in Mali. The European Journal of Development Research 29:3, 648-674. [Crossref] · DOI
  96. Steven Haggblade, Bart Minten, Carl Pray, Thomas Reardon, David Zilberman. 2017. The Herbicide Revolution in Developing Countries: Patterns, Causes, and Implications. The European Journal of Development Research 29:3, 533-559. [Crossref] · DOI
  97. David Zilberman. 2017. Indirect land use change: much ado about (almost) nothing. GCB Bioenergy 9:3, 485-488. [Crossref] · DOI
  98. Alessandro K. Cerutti, Dario Donno, Maria Gabriella Mellano, Gabriele L. Beccaro. Environmental Sustainability of Traditional Crop Varieties 255-273. [Crossref] · DOI
  99. András Székács. 2017. Environmental and Ecological Aspects in the Overall Assessment of Bioeconomy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30:1, 153-170. [Crossref] · DOI
  100. Gal Hochman, Michael Traux, David Zilberman. US Biofuel Policies and Markets 15-38. [Crossref] · DOI
  101. David Zilberman, Deepak Rajagopal, Scott Kaplan. Effect of Biofuel on Agricultural Supply and Land Use 163-182. [Crossref] · DOI
  102. Jonathan R. McFadden, John A. Miranowski. Extreme Weather, Biotechnology, and Corn Productivity 337-361. [Crossref] · DOI
  103. Vartika Mathur, Lamis Javid, Samarth Kulshrestha, Aakash Mandal, Amarender A. Reddy. World Cultivation of Genetically Modified Crops: Opportunities and Risks 45-87. [Crossref] · DOI
  104. Prakashan Chellattan Veettil, Vijesh V. Krishna, Matin Qaim. 2017. Ecosystem impacts of pesticide reductions through Bt cotton adoption. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 61:1, 115-134. [Crossref] · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Barrows, G., Sexton, S., & Zilberman, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2014-02-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
99-120
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141902865
Cited by
210
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12
FWCI
25.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture and Biological Studies
Keywords
genetically modified crops, agricultural biotechnology, genetic engineering, crop adoption, crop yield, food prices, environmental effects, consumer health, agrochemical use, intellectual property, plant breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review