The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: An investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing
Abstract
Abstract Growing evidence shows that mobile commerce will increase consumers’ impulse buying behavior. However, existing study examining the impact factors on individuals’ impulse buying in mobile commerce is limited. Drawing on stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) paradigm, this study focuses on situation factors and reaction factors in mobile commerce to examine impulse buying. Building on prior literature of browsing and motivation theory, this study views hedonic browsing and utilitarian browsing as two key drivers on impulse buying in mobile commerce. This study adopts partial least squares estimation to analyze the data obtained from an online questionnaire. Two main findings emerge. First, three situation factors (portability, visual appeal and interpersonal influence) differently affect hedonic browsing and utilitarian browsing. Second, hedonic browsing directly and positively influences consumers’ urge to buy impulsively, whereas utilitarian browsing indirectly influences consumers’ urge to buy impulsively through hedonic browsing. Discussions, limitations, and implications are also presented in the paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020
Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298204600314 · Cited by 5,616
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284
Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238 · Cited by 2,151
Cited by
‘Instagram made Me buy it’: Generation Z impulse purchases in fashion industry
Djafarova, E., & Bowes, T. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102345 · Cited by 650
A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce
Sarkar, S., Chauhan, S., & Khare, A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.008 · Cited by 375
Qin, H., Peak, D. A., & Prybutok, V. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102337 · Cited by 259
Yang, F., Tang, J., Men, J., & Zheng, X. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102683 · Cited by 235
Self-citationLi, M., Wang, Q., & Cao, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19074378 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, X., Men, J., Yang, F., & Gong, X.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 151-160
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2930030360
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 68.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: An investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.010
- The paper
- Zheng, X., Men, J., Yang, F., & Gong, X. (2019). Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: An investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.