The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors
Open accessAbstract
The adoption of blockchain technologies require the consideration of a broad range of factors, over and above the predominantly technology focus of most current work. Whilst scholarly literature on blockchain technology is only beginning to emerge, majority are focused on the technicalities of the technology and tend to ignore the organizational complexities of adopting the technology. Drawing from a focused review of literature, this paper proposed a conceptual framework for adoption of blockchain technology capturing the complex relationships between institutional, market and technical factors. The framework highlights that varying outcomes are possible, and the change process is focal as this shapes the form blockchain applications take. Factors presented in the framework (institutional, market and technical) interact and mutually influence each other. The proposed framework can be used by organisations as a reference point for adopting blockchain applications and by scholars to expand, refine and evaluate research into blockchain technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Cited by 5,372
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
(2015) · Cited by 3,471
Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research
Scharpf, F. W. (1997) · Cited by 2,547
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149
Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods
Sivarajah, U., Kamal, M. M., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001 · Cited by 2,066
Self-citationBlockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016) · Cited by 1,658
Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works; Where It is Headed
Williamson, O. E. (1998) · De Economist · doi:10.1023/a:1003263908567 · Cited by 1,315
Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007 · Cited by 1,107
Self-citationThe Quest for Scalable Blockchain Fabric: Proof-of-Work vs. BFT Replication
Vukolić, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39028-4_9 · Cited by 1,051 · cited 2×
“…product-target offers (Sweet, 2018), whereas IBM has launched Blockchain as a Service (BaaS) on the Hyperledger Fabric open source blockchain architecture, to enable the setup of scalable, high throughput (Vukolić, 2015) trusted networks across private, public and government actors (Miller, 2017).”
Background
Cited by
Taherdoost, H. (2022) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers11020024 · Cited by 186
How can Blockchain technology support patent management? A systematic literature review
Denter, N. M., Seeger, F., & Moehrle, M. G. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102506 · Cited by 64
(2021) · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.096 · Cited by 26
RetractedSelf-sovereign Identities for Fighting the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic
Gans, R. B., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2021) · Digital Government: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3429629 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 302-309
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972575607
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 65.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.012
- The paper
- Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2020). A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
