Cited by 6Legal processes and jurisprudencePsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCriminal Justice and Penology

Traumatic residue, mediated remembering and video evidence of sexual violence: A case study

Open access
Regehr, Cheryl, Regehr, Kaitlyn, Birze, Arija·2022·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

This qualitative case study examines the impact of video evidence of violent crime in the tragic Canadian case of serial killers Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka. Through in-depth interviews with those centrally involved in the case, interviews with criminal justice professionals currently working with video evidence of violent crime, and review of official documents and media reports, we explore the complex role video evidence played in this case and the legacy it continues to have in society, the justice system, and in the individual lives of those involved twenty-five years later. Two primary sources of harm arose in our analysis: critogenic harm related to the use of video evidence in the justice process; and harm arising from the media publicity surrounding the video evidence. Both of these sources of harm intensified the trauma for victims and their families, and contributed to distress and trauma reactions of criminal justice professionals and members of the jury. Given the global increase in the use of video-evidence in criminal justice processes, it is imperative that continuing harms to those involved in the process are considered and mitigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101778

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Canadian focus on non-consensual distribution regardless of intent to cause distress is useful, as it focuses on the harm that the loss of control over personal images can cause, re-traumatizing survivors of sexual violence by creating technology-facilitated cycles of abuse that are perpetuated each time images are viewed.

    “This focus on non-consensual distribution regardless of intent to cause distress is useful, as it focuses on the harm that the loss of control over personal images can cause, re-traumatizing survivors of sexual violence by creating technology-facilitated cycles of abuse that are perpetuated each time images are viewed (Regehr et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Regehr, C., Regehr, K., & Birze, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Regehr, Cheryl
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
81
Pages
101778
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210254706
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
video evidence, sexual violence, trauma, criminal justice professionals, media publicity, victims and families, criminal justice system
MeSH terms
Canada, Criminal Law, Humans, Sex Offenses, Crime Victims, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review