Cited by 24Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Eyewitness or earwitness: The role of mental imagery in intrusion development

Krans, Julie, Näring, Gérard, Speckens, Anne, Becker, Eni S.·2011·International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/ijct.2011.4.2.154

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krans, J., Näring, G., Speckens, A., & Becker, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Published
2011-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
154-164
ISSN
1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121271754
Cited by
24
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, intrusive memories, mental imagery, visual imagery, avoidance, negative thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review