Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental study and numerical modeling of nonlinear dynamic response of SDOF system equipped with tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) tested on shaking table under harmonic excitation

Open access
Pietrosanti, Daniele, De Angelis, Maurizio, Giaralis, Agathoklis·2020·International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105762
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This paper considers a novel shaking table testing campaign to assess the tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) vibrations suppression attributes in harmonically excited structures under the combined effect of nonlinear structural response and nonlinear inerter device behavior deviating from the ideal linear inerter element developing acceleration-dependent force proportional to the inertance constant. Physical specimens of TMDI-equipped single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) structure are considered featuring a custom-built rack-and-pinion flywheel inerter device with nonlinear behavior due to friction and backlash effects to connect the TMDI secondary mass to the ground. Damping and elastic properties are endowed to the SDOF structure and to the TMDI via high damping rubber bearings (HDRBs) exhibiting softening nonlinear elastic behaviour. Comprehensive experimental data in time and frequency domains are presented for 9 specimens with different sets of secondary mass and inertance subject to sine-sweep excitations for three different amplitudes. The data demonstrate that the main practical advantage of the TMDI established in the literature for linear structures and ideal inerter elements (i.e., improved vibration suppression through increasing inertance without increasing secondary mass leading to lightweight vibration absorbers) is maintained for nonlinear structures and inerter devices. Moreover, a comparison of experimental data with data derived from two different nonlinear parametric numerical models capturing faithfully the HDRBs response, one using a nonlinear mechanical model to represent the inerter device and the other using an ideal linear inerter element instead, demonstrate that displacement, acceleration and base shear response of the SDOF structure is insignificantly influenced by the nonlinear attributes of the inerter device. This outcome paves the way for developing simplified, thus practically meritorious, optimal TMDI tuning approaches adopting the ideal inerter element assumption to model physical inerter devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105762

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Spencer, 2003, State of the art of structural control, Journal of structural engineering, 129, 845, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845
  2. Soong, 2002, Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice, Engineering Structures, 24, 243, 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X · DOI · Paper page
  3. Simo, 1984, The Analysis of Multilayer Elastomeric Bearings, ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 51, 256, 10.1115/1.3167609 · doi:10.1115/1.3167609
  4. Harvey Jr, 2016, A review of rolling-type seismic isolation: Historical development and future directions, Engineering Structures, 125, 521, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.031 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.031
  5. Elias, 2018, Seismic Energy Assessment of Buildings with Tuned Vibration Absorbers, Shock and Vibration, 10.1155/2018/2051687 · DOI
  6. Elias, 2019, Distributed Tuned Mass Dampers for Multi-Mode Control of Benchmark Building under Seismic Excitations, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 23, 1137, 10.1080/13632469.2017.1351407 · DOI
  7. Elias, 2019, Seismic Vulnerability of Non-Linear Building with Distributed Multiple Tuned Vibration Absorbers, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 1103, 10.1080/15732479.2019.1602149 · DOI
  8. Hu, 2015, Performance evaluation for inerter-based dynamic vibration absorbers, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 99, 297, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Barredo, 2018, Closed-form solutions for the optimal design of inerter-based dynamic vibration absorbers, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 144, 41, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.05.025 · DOI
  10. Ikago, 2012, Seismic control of single-degree-of-freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41, 453, 10.1002/eqe.1138 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lazar, 2012, Using an inerter-based device for structural vibration suppression, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43, 1129, 10.1002/eqe.2390 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Krenk, 2016, Tuned resonant mass or inerter-based absorbers: unified calibration with quasi-dynamic flexibility and inertia correction, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472
  13. Wen, 2017, Design and Evaluation of Tuned Inerter-Based Dampers for the Seismic Control of MDOF Structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 143, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001680 · DOI
  14. Pietrosanti, 2017, Optimal design and performance evaluation of systems with Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI), Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46, 1367, 10.1002/eqe.2861 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Zhang, 2017, Optimal configurations for a linear vibration suppression device in a multi‐storey building, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24, e1887, 10.1002/stc.1887 · DOI
  16. Giaralis, 2017, Wind-induced vibration mitigation in tall buildings using the tuned mass-damper-inerter, Journal of Structural Engineering, 143, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001863 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Petrini, 2020, Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design in wind-excited tall buildings for occupants’ comfort serviceability performance and energy harvesting, Engineering Structures, 204, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109904 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Giaralis, 2018, Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25, e2082., 10.1002/stc.2082 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ruiz, 2018, Risk-informed optimization of the tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) for the seismic protection of multi-storey building structures, Engineering Structures, 177, 836, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.074 · DOI
  20. Pan, 2018, Design of structure with inerter system based on stochastic response mitigation ratio, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25, e2169, 10.1002/stc.2169 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Taflanidis, 2019, Multi-objective optimal design of inerter-based vibration absorbers for earthquake protection of multi-storey building structures, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 356, 7754, 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.02.022 · DOI
  22. Zhao, 2019, A tuned liquid inerter system for vibration control, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 164, 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105171 · DOI
  23. Saitoh, 2012, On the performance of gyro-mass devices for displacement mitigation in base isolation systems, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 19, 246, 10.1002/stc.419 · DOI
  24. Zhao, 2016, Viscoelastically supported viscous mass damper incorporated into a seismic isolation system, Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 10
  25. De Domenico, 2018, An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI), Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47, 1169, 10.1002/eqe.3011 · DOI · Paper page
  26. De Domenico, 2018, Optimal design and seismic performance of tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) for structures with nonlinear base isolation systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47, 2539, 10.1002/eqe.3098 · DOI · Paper page
  27. De Angelis, 2019, Optimal tuning and assessment of inertial dampers with grounded inerter for vibration control of seismically excited base-isolated systems, Engineering Structures, 196, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.091 · DOI
  28. Basili, 2017, Dynamic response of a viscously damped two adjacent degree of freedom system linked by inerter subjected to base harmonic excitation, Procedia Engineering, 199, 1586, 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.062 · DOI
  29. Basili, 2018, Modal analysis and dynamic response of a two adjacent single degree of freedom systems linked by spring-dashpot-inerter elements, Engineering Structures, 174, 736, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.048 · DOI
  30. Basili, 2019, Defective two adjacent single degree of freedom systems linked by spring-dashpot-inerter for vibration control, Engineering Structures, 188, 480, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.030 · DOI
  31. Papageorgiou, 2008, Experimental testing and analysis of inerter devices, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 131
  32. Hessabi, 2016, Investigations of the application of gyro-mass dampers with various types of supplemental dampers for vibration control of building structures, Engineering Structures, 126, 174, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.045 · DOI
  33. Brzeski, 2017, Experimental study of the novel tuned mass damper with inerter which enables changes of inertance, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 404, 47, 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.034 · DOI
  34. Nakamura, 2014, Seismic response control using electromagnetic inertial mass dampers, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 43, 507, 10.1002/eqe.2355 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Zhu, 2019, Mechanical and energy-harvesting model for electromagnetic inertial mass dampers, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 120, 203, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Swift, 2013, Design and modelling of a fluid inerter, International Journal of Control, 86, 2035, 10.1080/00207179.2013.842263 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Liu, 2018, Model identification methodology for fluid-based inerters, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 106, 479, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.018 · DOI
  38. Wang, 2011, Designing and testing a hydraulic inerter, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 225, 66, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.006 · DOI
  39. Brzeski, 2017, Effects of play and inerter nonlinearities on the performance of tuned mass damper, Nonlinear Dynamics, 88, 1027, 10.1007/s11071-016-3292-1 · DOI
  40. De Domenico, 2018, Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings, Journal of the Franklin Institute
  41. Marian, 2017, The tuned mass-damper-inerter for harmonic vibrations suppression, attached mass reduction, and energy harvesting, Smart Structures and Systems, 19, 665
  42. Markou, 2016, Mechanical models for shear behavior in high damping rubber bearings, Soil Dynamics and Earhtquake Engineering, 90, 221, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.035 · doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.035
  43. Scheibe, 2009, A behavioral approach to play in mechanical networks, SIAM Journal of Control Optimization, 47, 2967, 10.1137/070704605 · DOI

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Pietrosanti, D., De Angelis, M., & Giaralis, A.
Venue
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
184
Pages
105762
ISSN
0020-7403 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105762
OpenAlex
W3028893452
Cited by
163
References
5
FWCI
10.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Sapienza Università di Roma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental study and numerical modeling of nonlinear dynamic response of SDOF system equipped with tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) tested on shaking table under harmonic excitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105762
The paper
Pietrosanti, D., De Angelis, M., & Giaralis, A. (2020). Experimental study and numerical modeling of nonlinear dynamic response of SDOF system equipped with tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) tested on shaking table under harmonic excitation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.