Cited by 91Electronic Health Records SystemsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

What, if all alerts were specific - estimating the potential impact on drug interaction alert burden

Seidling, Hanna M., Klein, Ulrike, Schaier, Matthias, Czock, David, Theile, Dirk, Pruszydlo, Markus G., Kaltschmidt, Jens, Mikus, Gerd +1 more·2014·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Purpose Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) may potentially improve prescribing quality, but are subject to poor user acceptance. Reasons for alert overriding have been identified and counterstrategies have been suggested; however, poor alert specificity, a prominent reason of alert overriding, has not been well addressed. This paper aims at structuring modulators that determine alert specificity and estimating their quantitative impact on alert burden. Methods We developed and summarized optimizing strategies to guarantee the specificity of alerts and applied them to a set of 100 critical and frequent drug interaction (DDI) alerts. Hence, DDI alerts were classified as dynamic, i.e. potentially sensitive to prescription-, co-medication-, or patient-related factors that would change alert severity or render the alert inappropriate compared to static, i.e. always applicable alerts not modulated by cofactors. Results Within the subset of 100 critical DDI alerts, only 10 alerts were considered as static and for 7 alerts, relevant factors are not generally available in today's patient charts or their consideration would not impact alert severity. The vast majority, i.e. 83 alerts, might require a decrease in alert severity due to factors related to the prescription (N=13), the co-medication (N=11), individual patient data (N=36), or combinations of them (N=23). Patient-related factors consisted mainly of three lab values, i.e. renal function, potassium, and therapeutic drug m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.12.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many organizations are not following these recommendations, in part due to a lack of consensus for whether or not to turn off or modify, or how to modify, alerts.

    “Although some organizations have successfully implemented these tools and reduced the number of alerts and overrides,38 other reports have found that many organizations are not following these recommendations, in part due to a lack of consensus for whether or not to turn off or modify, or how to modify, alerts.27,28,39”
  • Prior research has found that there are opportunities for improving or turning off CDS alerts to improve patient outcomes.

    “Prior research has found that there are opportunities for improving or turning off CDS alerts to improve patient outcomes.25–28”
  • A frequently described approach in prior literature involves individuals or committees reviewing EHR utilization logs or dashboards, which are effective at identifying individual alerts with high override rates and alert trends across departments or provider type.

    “One of the most frequently described approaches described in prior literature has involved individuals or committees reviewing EHR utilization logs or dashboards, as these are very effective at identifying individual alerts with high override rates, as well as alert trends across departments or provider type.27,28,34,38”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seidling, H. M., Klein, U., Schaier, M., Czock, D., Theile, D., Pruszydlo, M. G., Kaltschmidt, J., Mikus, G., & Haefeli, W. E.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Haefeli, Walter E.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
285-291
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093764256
Cited by
91
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6
FWCI
21.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01 IS 09027)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
drug interaction alerts, clinical decision support systems, alert burden, knowledge base refinement, concomitant medications, therapeutic drug monitoring, renal function, potassium, prescribing quality
MeSH terms
Drug Interactions, Humans, Medication Errors, Medication Systems, Safety, Reminder Systems, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review