Cited by 414Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityTechnology Use by Older AdultsDigital literacy in education

Sociodemographic determinants of digital health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Estrela, Marta, Semedo, Guilherme, Roque, Fátima, Ferreira, Pedro Lopes, Herdeiro, Maria Teresa·2023·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Differences in digital health literacy levels are associated with a lack of access to digital tools, usage patterns, and the ability to effectively use digital technologies. Although some studies have investigated the impact of sociodemographic factors on digital health literacy, a comprehensive evaluation of these factors has not been conducted. Therefore, this study sought to examine the sociodemographic determinants of digital health literacy by conducting a systematic review of the existing literature. METHODS: A search of four databases was conducted. Data extraction included information on study characteristics, sociodemographic factors, and the digital health literacy scales used. Meta-analyses for age and sex were conducted using RStudio software with the metaphor package. RESULTS: A total of 3922 articles were retrieved, of which 36 were included in this systematic review. Age had a negative effect on digital health literacy (B = -0.05, 95%CI [-0.06; -0.04]), particularly among older adults, whereas sex appeared to have no statistically significant influence among the included studies (B = - 0.17, 95%CI [-0.64; 0.30]). Educational level, higher income, and social support also appeared to have a positive influence on digital health literacy. DISCUSSION: This review highlighted the importance of addressing the digital health literacy needs of underprivileged populations, including immigrants and individuals with low socioeconomic status. It also emphasizes the need for more research to better understand the influence of sociodemographic, economic, and cultural differences on digital health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this review suggests digital health literacy is dependent on sociodemographic, economic, and cultural factors, which may require tailored interventions that consider these nuances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105124

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Estrela, M., Semedo, G., Roque, F., Ferreira, P. L., & Herdeiro, M. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Beira Interior (PT)
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Estrela, Marta
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
177
Pages
105124
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380204422
Cited by
414
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 178 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 8
FWCI
21.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • FCT NOVA
  • Institute of Biomedicine, University of Aveiro
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
digital health literacy, sociodemographic factors, age differences, sex differences, educational attainment, income, social support, older adults, socioeconomic status, immigrants, digital divide
MeSH terms
Aged, Health Status, Humans, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review