Cited by 23Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareHealthcare Policy and Management

The landscape of AI implementation in US hospitals

Hwang, Yeon-Mi, Ng, Madelena Y., Pillai, Malvika, Sahai, Michelle P., Hernandez-Boussard, Tina·2026·Nature Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44360-025-00016-7

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, Y.-M., Ng, M. Y., Pillai, M., Sahai, M. P., & Hernandez-Boussard, T.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Yeon-Mi
Venue
Nature Health
Published
2026-01-15
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
99-112
ISSN
3005-0693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7124317484
Cited by
23
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 23
FWCI
46.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Health (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
A nonprofit, independent public charity dedicated to improving the quality of care and advancing system-level solutions that support older adults.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, prediction model, regional disparities, health care access, socioeconomic indicators, hospital quality indicators, geographically weighted regression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review