Cited by 7Machine Learning in HealthcareAcute Kidney Injury ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Multimodal convolutional neural networks for the prediction of acute kidney injury in the intensive care

Open access
van Slobbe, R., Herrmannova, D., Boeke, D.J., Lima-Walton, E.S., Abu-Hanna, A., Vagliano, I.·2025·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Increased monitoring of health-related data for ICU patients holds great potential for the early prediction of medical outcomes. Research on whether the use of clinical notes and concepts from knowledge bases can improve the performance of prediction models is limited. We investigated the effects of combining clinical variables, clinical notes, and clinical concepts. We focus on the early prediction of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). AKI is a sudden reduction in kidney function measured by increased serum creatinine (SCr) or decreased urine output. AKI may occur in up to 30% of ICU stays. We developed three models based on convolutional neural networks using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database. The models used clinical variables, free-text notes, and concepts from the Elsevier H-Graph. Our models achieved good predictive performance (AUROC 0.73-0.90). These models were assessed both when using Scr and urine output as predictors and when omitting them. When Scr and urine output were used as predictors, models that included clinical notes and concepts together with clinical variables performed on par with models that only used clinical variables. When excluding SCr and urine output, predictive performance improved by combining multiple modalities. The models that used only clinical variables were externally validated on the eICU dataset and transported fairly to the new population (AUROC 0.68-0.77). Our in-depth…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105815

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kellum, 2012, Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury, Kidney Int. Suppl., 2, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Slobbe, R., Herrmannova, D., Boeke, D. J., Lima-Walton, E. S., Abu-Hanna, A., & Vagliano, I.
Affiliations
  • Elsevier BV (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Vagliano, I.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
196
Pages
105815
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407134183
Cited by
7
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (628011026, 2021.024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
acute kidney injury, intensive care unit, multimodal prediction, clinical notes, clinical concepts, knowledge base, serum creatinine, urine output, convolutional neural networks, MIMIC database, eICU, external validation, model portability, early outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Convolutional Neural Networks, Creatinine, Critical Care, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Acute Kidney Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review