Cited by 25Fluid Dynamics and Heat TransferIcing and De-icing Technologiesnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

A modeling study of sessile water droplet on the cold plate surface during freezing under natural convection with gravity effect considered

Menglong, LU, Mengjie, Song, Zhenjun, MA, Xiaotao, Wang, Long, Zhang·2021·International Journal of Multiphase Flow

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.103749

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menglong, L., Mengjie, S., Zhenjun, M., Xiaotao, W., & Long, Z.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
International Journal of Multiphase Flow
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
143
Pages
103749
ISSN
0301-9322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3182528673
Cited by
25
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Multiphase Flow (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
water droplets, natural convection, gravity effects, supercooling, droplet solidification, cold plate, freezing time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review