Cited by 111Nursing education and managementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Interventions for compassionate nursing care: A systematic review

Open access
Blomberg, Karin, Griffiths, Peter, Wengström, Yvonne, May, Carl, Bridges, Jackie·2016·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Compassion has been identified as an essential element of nursing and is increasingly under public scrutiny in the context of demands for high quality health care. While primary research on effectiveness of interventions to support compassionate nursing care has been reported, no rigorous critical overview exists. Objectives To systematically identify, describe and analyse research studies that evaluate interventions for compassionate nursing care; assess the descriptions of the interventions for compassionate care, including design and delivery of the intervention and theoretical framework; and to evaluate evidence for the effectiveness of interventions. Review methods Published international literature written in English up to June 2015 was identified from CINAHL, Medline and Cochrane Library databases. Primary research studies comparing outcomes of interventions to promote compassionate nursing care with a control condition were included. Studies were graded according to relative strength of methods and quality of description of intervention. Narrative description and analysis was undertaken supported by tabulation of key study data including study design, outcomes, intervention type and results. Results 25 interventions reported in 24 studies were included in the review. Intervention types included staff training (n=10), care model (n=9) and staff support (n=6). Intervention description was generally weak, especially in relation to describing participants and f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.009

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blomberg, K., Griffiths, P., Wengström, Y., May, C., & Bridges, J.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Blomberg, Karin
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
62
Pages
137-155
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2470153523
Cited by
111
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Örebro University
  • Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
compassionate nursing care, nursing interventions, employee training, models of care, staff support, intervention effectiveness, methodological quality, patient outcomes, quality of care, nurse-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Empathy, Humans, Nursing Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review