Cited by 63Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesInnovations in Medical Education

The impact of compassionate care education on nurses: A mixed‐method systematic review

Open access
Coffey, Alice, Saab, Mohamad M., Landers, Margaret, Cornally, Nicola, Hegarty, Josephine, Drennan, Jonathan, Lunn, Cora, Savage, Eileen·2019·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aims: To identify, describe, and summarize evidence from quantitative, qualitative, and mixed‐method studies conducted to prepare nurses and nursing students to lead on and/or deliver compassionate care. Design: Mixed‐method systematic review. Data sources: CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO, and SocINDEX (January 2007–February 2018). Review methods: Papers were screened by two independent reviewers using an online screening tool and data were extracted using a standardized data extraction table. Parallel‐results convergent synthesis was used to synthesize evidence from included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed‐method studies. Quality appraisal and risk of bias assessment were conducted. Results: Fifteen studies were included with three main themes and six sub‐themes: (a) programme impact (impact on ward‐level and senior nurses and impact on nursing students and educators); (b) programme characteristics (characteristics leading to positive outcomes and characteristics leading to negative outcomes); and (c) programme implementation (implementation barriers and implementation facilitators). Compassionate care education programmes helped enhance nurses' ability to engage in reflective practice, deal with clinical challenges, and gain confidence. The importance of nurturing compassionate care delivery in nursing education was highlighted in the literature. Various nursing‐level, patient‐level, and organizational barriers to compassionate care delivery were identified. Conclusion: The impact of compassionate care educational programmes on nurses was predominantly positive. Further evaluation of the long‐term impact of these programmes on nurses, patients, and organizations is warranted. Impact: Optimal delivery of compassionate care can be achieved by building organizational infrastructures that support nurses from all levels to attend education programmes and lead on compassionate care delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.14088

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compassionate care programmes had a positive effect on clinical leadership and confidence to lead change in practice.

    “Compassionate care programmes had a positive effect on clinical leadership and confidence to lead change in practice”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Coffey et al. (2019)

    The Conclusion (p. 24) makes the same point about clinical leadership and confidence to lead change, but says the review evidence “suggests” this positive effect. The claim omits that qualification and states the effect as fact. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Compassionate care education led to improved job satisfaction, heightened sense of well-being, and increased pride in the nursing profession.

    “compassionate care education led to improved job satisfaction, heightened sense of well‐being, and increased pride in the nursing profession”

    From Whither compassionate leadership? A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Coffey et al. (2019)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (Eds.) (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from www.cochrane-h andbook.org on 19 December 2018.
  2. The Cochrane Collaboration (2017). Covidence. Retrieved from http://community.cochrane.org/tools/review-production-tools/covidence on 28 March 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coffey, A., Saab, M. M., Landers, M., Cornally, N., Hegarty, J., Drennan, J., Lunn, C., & Savage, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Limerick (IE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • University Hospital Limerick (IE)
Corresponding author
Coffey, Alice
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-20
Volume
75
Issue
11
Pages
2340-2351
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2948475136
Cited by
63
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
compassionate care, nursing education, nursing students, nurses, reflective practice, implementation barriers and facilitators, organizational support, patient care delivery
MeSH terms
Education, Nursing, Empathy, Humans, Students, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review