Cited by 216Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsNursing education and managementWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Speaking up behaviours (safety voices) of healthcare workers: A metasynthesis of qualitative research studies

Morrow, Kelly J., Gustavson, Allison M., Jones, Jacqueline·2016·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background A critical characteristic of effective teams in any setting is when each member is willing to speak up to share thoughts and ideas to improve processes. In spite of attempts by healthcare systems to encourage employees to speak up, employee silence remains a common cause of communication breakdowns, contributing to errors and suboptimal care delivery. Nurses in particular have reported low confidence in their communication abilities, and cite the belief that speaking up will not make a difference. Objective To develop an understanding of how nurses and other healthcare workers relate to safety voice behaviors and how this might influence clinical practice. Data sources A search of the PubMed, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier databases was conducted using keywords employee, nurse, qualitative, speak up, silence, safety, voice, and safety voice identified 372 articles with 11 retained after a review of the abstracts. Studies took place in Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Hong Kong, East Africa, Ireland, Korea, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States representing 504 healthcare workers including 354 nurses. Methods This interpretive meta-synthesis of 11 qualitative articles published from 2005 to 2015 was conducted using a social constructivist approach with thematic analysis. Results The four themes identified are: 1) hierarchies and power dynamics negatively affect safety voice, 2) open communication is unsafe and ineffective, 3) embedded expectations of nurse behavior affect safety voice, and 4) nurse managers have a powerful positive or negative affect on safety voice. Conclusions Healthcare workers worldwide report multiple social and hierarchy related fears surrounding the utilization of safety voice behaviors. Hesitance to speak up is pervasive among nurses, as is low self-efficacy related to safety voice. The presence of caring leaders, peer support, and an organizational commitment to safe, open cultures, may improve safety voice utilization among nurses and other healthcare workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrow, K. J., Gustavson, A. M., & Jones, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Morrow, Kelly J.
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
64
Pages
42-51
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522341739
Cited by
216
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
safety voice, speaking up, employee silence, nurses, healthcare workers, organizational hierarchy, power relations, open communication, nurse managers, self-efficacy, organizational culture, peer support, patient safety, communication breakdown
MeSH terms
Communication, Health Personnel, Nurse Administrators, Nurses, Safety Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review