Speaking up behaviours (safety voices) of healthcare workers: A metasynthesis of qualitative research studies
Abstract
Background A critical characteristic of effective teams in any setting is when each member is willing to speak up to share thoughts and ideas to improve processes. In spite of attempts by healthcare systems to encourage employees to speak up, employee silence remains a common cause of communication breakdowns, contributing to errors and suboptimal care delivery. Nurses in particular have reported low confidence in their communication abilities, and cite the belief that speaking up will not make a difference. Objective To develop an understanding of how nurses and other healthcare workers relate to safety voice behaviors and how this might influence clinical practice. Data sources A search of the PubMed, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier databases was conducted using keywords employee, nurse, qualitative, speak up, silence, safety, voice, and safety voice identified 372 articles with 11 retained after a review of the abstracts. Studies took place in Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Hong Kong, East Africa, Ireland, Korea, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States representing 504 healthcare workers including 354 nurses. Methods This interpretive meta-synthesis of 11 qualitative articles published from 2005 to 2015 was conducted using a social constructivist approach with thematic analysis. Results The four themes identified are: 1) hierarchies and power dynamics negatively affect safety voice, 2) open communication is unsafe and ineffective, 3) embedded expectations of nurse behavior affect safety voice, and 4) nurse managers have a powerful positive or negative affect on safety voice. Conclusions Healthcare workers worldwide report multiple social and hierarchy related fears surrounding the utilization of safety voice behaviors. Hesitance to speak up is pervasive among nurses, as is low self-efficacy related to safety voice. The presence of caring leaders, peer support, and an organizational commitment to safe, open cultures, may improve safety voice utilization among nurses and other healthcare workers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Open and supportive leadership can foster the speaking-up behaviors of health-care workers by creating an environment where it is safe to speak up.
“For example, a review of 11 qualitative studies found that open and supportive leadership could foster the speaking‐up behaviors of health‐care workers by creating an environment where it is safe to speak up (Morrow, Gustavson, & Jones, 2016).”
From Psychological Safety as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Inclusive Leadership and Nurse Voice Behaviors and Error Reporting (2021) · cites this paper as Morrow, Gustavson, & Jones, 2016
Cites
Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 · Cited by 2,250 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, S. E., & Dahinten, V. S. (2021) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12689 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Speaking up to prevent harm: A systematic review of the safety voice literature
Noort, M. C., Reader, T. W., & Gillespie, A. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.039 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Leslie, K., Dunk, M., Staempfli, S., & Cook, K. (2021) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(21)00118-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morrow, K. J., Gustavson, A. M., & Jones, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morrow, Kelly J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 42-51
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2522341739
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- safety voice, speaking up, employee silence, nurses, healthcare workers, organizational hierarchy, power relations, open communication, nurse managers, self-efficacy, organizational culture, peer support, patient safety, communication breakdown
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Health Personnel, Nurse Administrators, Nurses, Safety Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review