Cited by 3Healthcare RegulationEthics in medical practiceNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership

Mandatory reporting of colleagues to regulators: an overview of requirements for registered nurses in 12 Canadian jurisdictions

Leslie, Kathleen, Dunk, Meaghan, Staempfli, Sabina, Cook, Karen·2021·Journal of Nursing Regulation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2155-8256(21)00118-6

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 30 (37.5%) of the included empirical studies situated Canadian nursing regulation as the main area of inquiry.

    “Only 30 (37.5%) of the included empirical studies situated Canadian nursing regulation as the main area of inquiry [16,105,108,115,116,123,128,133,136–139,141–143,145,151–153,155,157,160,161,163–165,168,174–176].”

    From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [108]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leslie, K., Dunk, M., Staempfli, S., & Cook, K.
Venue
Journal of Nursing Regulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
68-77
ISSN
2155-8256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208892927
Cited by
3
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Nursing Regulation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Keywords
mandatory reporting, registered nurses, professional regulation, regulatory agencies, sexual misconduct, sexual abuse, interjurisdictional variation, Canadian legislation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review