Cited by 167Nursing Roles and PracticesNursing education and managementHealthcare Quality and Satisfaction

Impact of community based nurse-led clinics on patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, patient access and cost effectiveness: A systematic review

Randall, Sue, Crawford, Tonia, Currie, Jane, River, Jo, Betihavas, Vasiliki·2017·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background The role and scope of nursing practice has evolved in response to the dynamic needs of individuals, communities, and healthcare services. Health services are now focused on maintaining people in their communities, and keeping them out of hospital where possible. Community based nurse-led clinics are ideally placed to work towards this goal. The initial impetus for these services was to increase patient access to care, to provide a cost-effective and high quality streamlined service.Objectives This systematic review aimed to identify the impact of nurse-led clinics in relation to patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, impact on patient access to services, and cost effectiveness.Methods A review of community based nurse-led clinic research in Medline, CINAHL and Embase was undertaken using MeSH terms: Nurse-managed centres, Practice, Patterns, Nurse, Ambulatory Care, keywords: nurse-led clinic, nurse led clinic, community and phrases primary health care and primary care. Papers were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Appraisal criteria.Results The final review comprised 15 studies with 3965 participants. Most studies explored patient satisfaction which was largely positive towards nurse-led clinics. Patient outcomes reported were typically from self-report, although some papers addressed objective clinical measures; again positive. Access was reported as being increased. Cost-effectiveness was the least reported impact measure with mixed results.Conclusions Nurse-led clinics have largely shown positive impact on patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, access to care and mixed results on cost-effectiveness. Future research evaluating NLCs needs to adopt a standardised structure to provide rigorous evaluations that can rationalise further efforts to set up community based nurse-led clinical services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.05.008

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The economic impact of nurse-led primary care remains less documented than its clinical quality.

    “Nevertheless, the economic impact of nurse-led primary care remains less documented than its clinical quality.9,20,23,26,42-44”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randall, S., Crawford, T., Currie, J., River, J., & Betihavas, V.
Corresponding author
Randall, Sue
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
73
Pages
24-33
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613256203
Cited by
167
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Keywords
nurse-led clinics, community-based care, patient satisfaction, patient outcomes, health care access, cost-effectiveness, primary care, outpatient care
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Patient Satisfaction, Practice Patterns, Nurses'

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review