Cited by 3Nursing Roles and PracticesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Pre–post analysis of the impact of British Columbia nurse practitioner primary care clinics on patient health and care experience

Open access
Contandriopoulos, Damien, Bertoni, Katherine, Duhoux, Arnaud, Randhawa, Gurprit K·2023·BMJ Open

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of a primary care nurse practitioner (NP)-led clinic model piloted in British Columbia (Canada) on patients’ health and care experience. Design: The study relies on a quasi-experimental longitudinal design based on a pre-and-post survey of patients receiving care in NP-led clinics. The prerostering survey (T0) was focused on patients’ health status and care experiences preceding being rostered to the NP clinic. One year later, patients were asked to complete a similar survey (T1) focused on the care experiences with the NP clinic. Setting: To solve recurring problems related to poor primary care accessibility, British Columbia opened four pilot NP-led clinics in 2020. Each clinic has the equivalent of approximately six full-time NPs, four other clinicians plus support staff. Clinics are located in four cities ranging from urban to suburban. Participants: Recruitment was conducted by the clinic’s clerical staff or by their care provider. A total of 437 usable T0 surveys and 254 matched and usable T1 surveys were collected. Primary outcome measures: The survey instrument was focused on five core dimensions of patients’ primary care experience (accessibility, continuity, comprehensiveness, responsiveness and outcomes of care) as well as on the SF-12 Short-form Health Survey. Results: Scores for all dimensions of patients’ primary care experience increased significantly: accessibility (T0=5.9, T1=7.9, p<0.001), continuity (T0=5.5, T1=8.8, p<0.001), comprehensiveness (T0=5.6, T1=8.4, p<0.001), responsiveness (T0=7.2, T1=9.5, p<0.001), outcomes of care (T0=5.0, T1=8.3, p<0.001). SF-12 Physical health T-scores also rose significantly (T0=44.8, T1=47.6, p<0.001) but no changes we found in the mental health T scores (T0=45.8, T1=46.3 p=0.709). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the NP-led primary care model studied here likely constitutes an effective approach to improve primary care accessibility and quality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072812

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parallel research on patients' socio-demographic profile and care experience before joining NP-PCCs, and research on patients' health and care experience in NP-PCCs, suggest that the NP-PCC model also constitutes an effective way to address current problems in accessing good quality longitudinal care in BC.

    “Further, parallel research focused on the socio-demographic profile of patients and their care experience before joining the NP-PCCs 60 as well as research on patients’ health and care experience in NP-PCCs 59 suggest that the NP-PCC model also constitutes an effective way to address current problems in accessing good quality longitudinal care in BC.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Christensen C, Grossman J, Hwang J. The Innovator’s Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care. New-York: McGraw Hill, 2016.
  2. [36]Contandriopoulos D, Bertoni K, Horne B, et al. A descriptive analysis of the previous care experiences of patients being Rostered in BC’s new nurse-practitioner primary care clinics. Nurse Practitioner Open Journal 2023.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Contandriopoulos, D., Bertoni, K., Duhoux, A., & Randhawa, G. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Contandriopoulos, Damien
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
e072812
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387784590
Cited by
3
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nurses and Nurse Practitioners of British Columbia (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
nurse practitioner-led clinic, primary care, patient experience, primary care access, continuity of care, comprehensiveness of care, health care outcomes, physical health, mental health, health status, British Columbia
MeSH terms
British Columbia, Humans, Nurse Practitioners, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review