Cited by 334Health Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Sciences Research and Education

Increasing value and reducing waste by optimizing the development of complex interventions: enriching the development phase of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework.

Open access
Bleijenberg, Nienke, de Man-van Ginkel, Janneke M., Trappenburg, Jaap C.A., Ettema, Roelof G.A., Sino, Carolien G., Heim, Noor, Hafsteindóttir, Thóra B., Richards, David A. +1 more·2018·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years there has been much emphasis on 'research waste' caused by poor question selection, insufficient attention to previous research results, and avoidable weakness in research design, conduct and analysis. Little attention has been paid to the effect of inadequate development of interventions before proceeding to a full clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: We therefore propose to enrich the development phase of the MRC Framework by adding crucial elements to improve the likelihood of success and enhance the fit with clinical practice METHODS: Based on existing intervention development guidance and synthesis, a comprehensive iterative intervention development approach is proposed. Examples from published reports are presented to illustrate the methodology that can be applied within each element to enhance the intervention design. RESULTS: A comprehensive iterative approach is presented by combining the elements of the MRC Framework development phase with essential elements from existing guidance including: problem identification, the systematic identification of evidence, identification or development of theory, determination of needs, the examination of current practice and context, modelling the process and expected outcomes leading to final element: the intervention design. All elements are drawn from existing models to provide intervention developers with a greater chance of producing an intervention that is well adopted, effective and fitted to the context. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive approach of developing interventions will strengthen the internal and external validity, minimize research waste and add value to health care research. In complex interventions in health care research, flaws in the development process immediately impact the chances of success. Knowledge regarding the causal mechanisms and interactions within the intended clinical context is needed to develop interventions that fit daily practice and are beneficial for the end-user.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.001

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bleijenberg et al. suggest using structured methodological frameworks such as Intervention Mapping that fulfills MRC quality criteria on intervention development.

    “In order to overcome these shortcomings, Bleijenberg et al. (31) suggest using structured methodological frameworks such as the Intervention Mapping (IM) that fulfills the Medical Research Council’s (MRC) quality criteria on intervention development (31, 32).”

    From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Background and §2.3 propose a systematic approach that combines the MRC development phase with elements of existing intervention-development guidance. The paper cites a book on Intervention Mapping, but our copy does not specifically recommend Intervention Mapping as the framework to use or say that it fulfills MRC quality criteria. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The PRECEDE-model allowed the synthetization of multi-level data and an in-depth understanding of the situation necessary for identifying evidence-based change mechanisms.

    “The PRECEDE-model allowed us the synthetization of multi-level data and an in-depth understanding of our situation necessary for identifying evidence-based change mechanisms (31).”

    From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [31]

    Section 2.3.6 (page unavailable) says modelling can synthesize evidence to identify modifiable determinants and intervention points. The cited paper does not identify the PRECEDE model or show that it enabled the citing authors’ synthesis of multi-level data and understanding of their situation; a search for “PRECEDE” found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An intervention black box makes it difficult to understand why specific therapy components did not work in a clinical trial.

    “An “intervention black box” then makes it difficult to understand why specific therapy components didn’t work in a clinical trial (31).”
  • Neglecting the development phase can lead to inefficient treatments because of poor problem definition, insufficient attention to evidence and context needs, missing model, and unsound selection of change mechanisms.

    “Neglecting the actual development phase can be problematic, as a poor problem definition, insufficient attention to existing evidence and context needs, a missing model underlying the intervention, and an unsound selection of hypothesized change mechanisms can lead to inefficient treatments (30–32).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Conn, V.S., Rantz, M.J., Wipke-Tevis, D.D., Maas, M.L., 2001a. Designing effective nur- sing interventions. Res. Nurs. Health 24 (5), 433-442.
  2. Conn, V.S., Rantz, M.J., Wipke-Tevis, D.D., Maas, M.L., 2001b. Designing effective nur- sing interventions. Res. Nurs. Health 24 (5), 433-442.
  3. Glasziou, P., Chalmers, I., Altman, D.G., et al., 2010b. Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ 341, c3852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3852. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Richards, D.A., Hallberg, I.R., 2015b. Complex Interventions in Health: An Overview of Research Methods. Routledge.
  5. WHO, 2001. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization, geneva, pp. 1-303.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bleijenberg, N., de Man-van Ginkel, J. M., Trappenburg, J. C. A., Ettema, R. G. A., Sino, C. G., Heim, N., Hafsteindóttir, T. B., Richards, D. A., & Schuurmans, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Bleijenberg, Nienke
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
79
Pages
86-93
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771761888
Cited by
334
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 4
FWCI
26.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10037, NF-SI-0611-10203)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
intervention development, complex interventions, MRC framework, research waste, intervention design, needs assessment, contextual analysis, causal mechanisms, research validity, health care research
MeSH terms
Waste Management, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review