The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influenza vaccine uptake, COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine hesitancy among nurses: A survey
Open accessAbstract
Background A healthy healthcare system requires healthy healthcare workers. Protecting healthcare workers including nurses against COVID-19 is crucial, and vaccination could be a viable future option. However, vaccine hesitancy remains a global challenge. Nurses, as a trustworthy and creditable source of vaccine-related information, may build public confidence in vaccination. Hence, research on vaccine hesitancy among nurses is warranted. Objectives This study estimated nurses’ influenza vaccination behaviors and intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine when available, and examined their corresponding 5C psychological antecedents (confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility). To investigate the impact of COVID-19-related work demands, the mediation effects of work stress on the association between work demands and COVID-19 vaccination intention were also examined. Design Cross-sectional online survey Settings Nurses were invited to participate via the promotion of a professional nursing organization and by personal referrals during the COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong between mid-March and late April 2020. Participants 1,205 eligible nurses (mean age = 40.79, SD = 10.47; 90% being female) were included in the analyses. Methods Demographics, influenza vaccination, intention to have COVID-19 vaccine, the 5C vaccine hesitancy components, work stress and COVID-19-related work demands (insufficient supply of personal protective equipment, involvement in isolation rooms, and unfavorable attitudes towards workplace infection control policies) were reported in the survey. Results The influenza vaccine uptake rate and the proportion intending to take COVID-19 vaccine were 49% and 63%, respectively. Influenza vaccination was associated with working in public hospitals and all 5C constructs (more confidence, more collective responsibility and less complacency, constraints, and calculation), whereas stronger COVID-19 vaccination intention was associated with younger age, more confidence, less complacency and more collective responsibility. COVID-19-related demands were associated with greater work stress, and hence stronger COVID-19 vaccination intention. Conclusion The potential uptake rate of COVID-19 vaccine among nurses was suboptimal to achieve herd immunity. The 5C constructs were useful in predicting influenza vaccination and, to a lesser extent, the intention to take COVID-19 vaccine. The uncertain attributes such as effectiveness, side effects, and effective duration of the COVID-19 vaccine may contribute to this discrepancy. With less work stress among nurses in the post-pandemic period, the intention to take COVID-19 vaccine will likely drop. The 5C constructs should be infused in vaccination campaigns. While a COVID-19 vaccine could be ready soon, the nursing profession may not be ready to accept it. More research work is needed to boost the uptake rate. Tweetable abstract Less than two-third of nurses intended to take COVID-19 vaccine when available. While a COVID-19 vaccine could be ready soon, nursing profession is not ready to accept it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M. D., & Paterson, P. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081 · Cited by 2,254
Ranney, M. L., Griffeth, V., & Jha, A. K. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2006141 · Cited by 2,018
Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Osterholm, M. T., Kelley, N. S., Sommer, A., & Belongia, E. A. (2012) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70295-x · Cited by 1,789
The benefits and costs of using social distancing to flatten the curve for COVID-19
Thunström, L., Newbold, S. C., Finnoff, D., Ashworth, M., & Shogren, J. F. (2020) · Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis · doi:10.1017/bca.2020.12 · Cited by 439
Death from COVID-19 of 23 Health Care Workers in China
Zhan, M., Qin, Y., Xue, X., & Zhu, S. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2005696 · Cited by 313
Health Communication and Vaccine Hesitancy
Goldstein, S., MacDonald, N. E., & Guirguis, S. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.042 · Cited by 265
Kwok, K. O., Leung, G. M., Lam, W. Y., & Riley, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0026 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Cited by
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates
Sallam, M. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9020160 · Cited by 2,128
Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Machida, M., Nakamura, I., Kojima, T., Saito, R., Nakaya, T., Hanibuchi, T., Takamiya, T., Odagiri, Y., Fukushima, N., Kikuchi, H., et al. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9030210 · Cited by 281
Dzieciolowska, S., Hamel, D., Gadio, S., Dionne, M., Gagnon, D., Robitaille, L., Cook, E., Caron, I., Talib, A., Parkes, L., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.079 · Cited by 268
Benham, J. L., Atabati, O., Oxoby, R. J., Mourali, M., Shaffer, B., Sheikh, H., Boucher, J.-C., Constantinescu, C., Parsons Leigh, J., Ivers, N. M., et al. (2021) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/30424 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwok, K. O., Li, K.-K., WEI, W. I., Tang, A., Wong, S. Y. S., & Lee, S. S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 103854
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3111674506
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 72.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influenza vaccine uptake, COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine hesitancy among nurses: A survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103854
- The paper
- Kwok, K. O., Li, K.-K., WEI, W. I., Tang, A., Wong, S. Y. S., & Lee, S. S. (2021). Influenza vaccine uptake, COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine hesitancy among nurses: A survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.